The US's 7-day average number of tests as of yesterday (per @COVID19Tracking) was ~846K. The week before? ~688K. Of course, this is expected with increased testing as schools open up.
The 7-day average percent testing positive hit 4.74% yesterday—the lowest since mid-June.
2/x
Turning to state-level data, "more than half" of US states certainly did not show an increase in percent testing positive.
21 of them did. But even that number is misleading. It includes CT, NH, NJ, VT, and NM, all of which are below 3% positive (VT is 0.59%, up from 0.54%)
3/x
It also includes 4 additional states with a percent testing positive increase of less than 1%, which is such a small fluctuation that the week-over-week number could change after today's numbers drop.
So, now we're down to 12 states with >1% increases.
4/x
This doesn't mean all is well, of course. A couple states actually decreased this past week still have high percentages, and had just increased the week before (ID & ND).
The Midwest/Heartland states are primarily the ones currently seeing the large %s and increases.
5/x
Of course, the raw case count in many of these states is quite low, so there is more % volatility. For example, Montana is on the increase list, but 47 fewer reported cases per day this past week would've meant a decrease. Reporting fluctuations can thus cause larger moves.
6/x
Of course we were going to see "rising cases" as colleges and schools started in-person and hybrid models. Testing has risen even faster than the recent growth in cases though.
I was actually surprised we didn't start to see the test/case rise a couple weeks sooner.
7/x
We've gone from a virus that showed the greatest spread primarily in the large coastal cities, especially the Northeast, moved to the southern US, still mostly in the larger cities, and now seems to have gotten to the tertiary cities in lower population states.
8/x
40K reported cases on 1M tests is a hell of a lot better than 35K on 700K tests. Neither is the *actual* number of cases, but the former almost certainly represents a smaller number (notwithstanding the issues with Ct and PCR testing...which is a whole other can of worms).
9/x
So please don't just regurgitate what I'm sure will soon rise to a cacophony of articles and tweets with some kind of "Covid Case Alert!" headline.
Stay safe & informed. You can start by following me for my daily updates, which look like this:
A few days ago, I stumbled upon an exchange between @michaelsfuhrer, @greg_travis, @karencutter4, @PienaarJm.
The crux is Greg’s claim of a sharp increase from 2022 to 2023 in 18-44yo deaths from disease in the US (his graphic below).
Greg is wrong.
Join me on a 12-pack 🧵
2/ It quickly became apparent that the main point of contention was whether including R99-coded deaths (“Other ill-defined and unspecified causes of mortality”) in Greg's definition of deaths from disease, as they are later re-coded to non-disease deaths.
3/ Oh, but not to worry. Greg states that "R99 itself is a tiny portion of overall deaths and generally resolves to <2,000 deaths a month overall (out of 300K deaths a month)."
Weekly #Covid19 update in my Substack newsletter, The Issue. Just click the link below.
I'll excerpt a few portions below, but the upshot is: steady rise in cases/% positive, lower rise in Hosps, even lower for ICUs, and continued decline in deaths. thelawyercraig.substack.com/p/covid-19-wee…
"Despite the rise in other metrics, deaths late last week dropped below 300 (7-day-average) for the first time since June/July 2021. ICU census is still well below pre-Omicron pandemic lows."
"Perhaps the best news right now is global Covid deaths. According to Our World in Data, global daily confirmed Covid-19 deaths (7DA) have dropped to 1,772. For comparison, . . . our lowest ever number globally was 4,436 before Omicron entered the picture."
I cannot overstate the absolute idiocy of touting this study purporting to show Omicron is just as likely to send someone to the hospital or the morgue as Delta.
There are 2 enormous issues with this study (among others, I'm sure).
2/ ISSUE #1: The authors use PCR positives as the case denominator and just assume that the "case-to-infection" ratio was similar between all 4 periods. Unbelievable.
The fact that a study can look at the data and just say this boggles my mind. Just read that green highlighting!
3/ Here were Massachusetts' peak positive testing percentages for the 4 different periods in the study (data = @CDCgov)
8.69% - Winter 20-21
2.62% - Spring 21 (sub-1% for 38 days!)
4.47% - "Delta" (per the study)
23.36% - "Omicron"
#Covid19 in South Africa...5th wave? Well, that depends on what metric you use to define wave.
Thread 🧵🧵🧵
2/ If you look at 7DA cases, it's a clear increase. It's a long way off from the OG Omicron peak (and not quite as vertical), but they're still up ~4x in barely over 2 weeks.
3/ But everywhere is testing a bit less these days, so what about % positive? Yep, even more vertical, and more closely resembles the prior waves.
Of course, these are all just tests/infections. Let's look at outcomes...
Down 91.5% from peak. Seeing a rise nationally from recent low of 2.13%. During the entire pandemic, was only lower in June 2021 than our recent numbers.