Sean Casten Profile picture
Sep 21, 2020 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Supreme Court right now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

Jan 30
I’ve been meaning to do this for a while, but today’s events make it more urgent: why Trump’s attacks on DEI are founded in racism (of course) but also unconstitutional. Thread:
1. On that second point, I want to take an intentionally “originalist” perspective here, because the plain text of the Constitution matters to the question.
2. Recall our history. In the aftermath of the Civil War, we passed the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments (the “Reconstruction Amendments”. The first were passed before re-unification and southern states were required to ratify as a pre-condition to rejoining the Union
Read 23 tweets
Jan 20
On this MLK day, take a moment to re-read his “mountaintop” speech, delivered the day before his assassination. It is full of humanity, and hope and a reminder that our work is most necessary when it is hardest to believe we will succeed. americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkiv…
1. Read this knowing that King was trying to expand his mission and message and getting pushback from his friends, some of whom were arguing his time had passed.
2. Read this in light of the other, less patriotic, less hopeful, less constructive things happening on this day. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 16
Another day, another horrible, mistitled GOP bill passes on the floor that needs explanation. I wish I could tell you this is the last of the threads I'll have to do. Anyway, today's travesty was HR 30, the "Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act". Read on:
1. The bill on paper seems reasonable enough. If you are convicted or admit to having committed a sex offense, domestic violence, stalking, child abuse or violation of a protective order and are undocumented you will be deported. Text here: congress.gov/bill/119th-con…
2. And yet the bill has been opposed by over 200 religious and DV groups. It's important to understand why the people who ACTUALLY understand this issue and aren't just trying to score cheap political points are so vocal on this.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 15
Sitting here watching the Chris Wright nomination hearings and getting ever more frustrated by the failure - intentional by him and some Senators, inadvertent by others - to differentiate between produced and useful energy. Thread:
1. Suppose that there was a hearing for agriculture secretary and a Senator said "what will you doing to ensure food access for American people" and the nominee said "American farmers produce more calories than any other country." We'd agree that's a dodge. And yet...
2. When Senators ask an Energy Sec'y nominee what they'll do to ensure access to affordable energy and the nominee talks about oil and gas production they are dodging the question. Our economy depends on delivered energy, just as our bellies depend on food on the plate.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 8
It seems a discussion is in order of the Laken Riley Act that I happily voted against on the House floor today. It is a bill that served no purpose than to stir up anger. But let’s quickly review why:
1. First, undocumented people in the US who are convicted of felonies are already subject to deportation. If that is your concern you should be happy with existing law. As I am.
2. Second, the majority of undocumented folks in the US are visa overstays and farm workers, many are in mixed families and they have a VERY low propensity to commit crime. The stereotype is not representative of the population at hand. See this thread:
Read 11 tweets
Jan 2
Some thoughts on Roberts' year end report. It is - par for the course for him - totally tone deaf. But we are all, to varying degrees complicit in spreading the fiction that the judicial branch isn't just as political as any other part of government. nytimes.com/2024/12/31/us/…
1. He is of course right to fear a country that chooses not to follow the rulings of the court. But any official in a democratically-elected government knows that they serve subject to the consent of the governed.
2. One need not condone mob violence to acknowledge that respect for public will and preservation of trust in democratic institutions keeps us from passing dumb laws. That awareness of public sentiment is - in the purest sense - political calculus.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(