This woman launches a smear against group of men for publishing a paper, asserting they are a "patriarchy" because they are all men.
It's a drive by smear that doesn't even engage with the work. She just attacks them.
2/ This project is open to anyone, *ANYONE* to submit code. It's open to thd public and anybody who wants to work on the project may do so.
Here is the link to their contribution guidelines. It is a VERY open amd welcoming group
3/ Why do I care? Because of her hypocrisy. She has ZERO popblem leveraging her looks to get 16k followers, and letting you know she's pretty via humble-brags and flexes dressed up as oppression: "you guys, I got told I'm pretty again. Being hot is so very hard. I am oppressed"
4/ She's using "social justice" politics to attack men, while at the same time leveraging her looks to get clout from the same men she attacks.
Then, she plays the victim card to avoid being called on any of it.
This is a cynical power game she's playing for clout.
5/ iN cAsE yA'Ll FoRgOt
Post those selfits Clara. Tell everyone your bi to get more of that victimhood clout.
6/ According to social Justice theory Clara has white privilidge, thin privilidge, and beauty privilidge.
I wonder why @ramencult doesn't call her self a "white woman" in STEM🤔🤔🤔
Oh wait, I know why: Clara only is interested in social justice concepts that give her clout.
7/ This is an amazing tweet and I wish I had thought of it
1/ The ex-CEO of wikimedia, said a free and open internet is a "White Male westernized construct." Now She's CEO of NPR and is paid with your tax dollars to decide what information people see on NPR.
Woke activists hijacked every government institution.
2/ The first thing to realize is that this is not a isolated case. Let's look at some examples:
Kelisa Wing was a Pentagon official in charge of DEIn for the Defense Department’s schools. She gets paid to brainwash people with DEI while taking sarcastic shots at white people.
3/ The Center for Disease Control decided to make *Health Equity* core to its mission, they say that means advocating for:
-Free internet access
-Free access to bikes
-Policy changes in housing
They're advocating for woke policy using taxpayer funded government institutions
The incentive structure of the online attention economy is optimized for conflict. As such, there is no way for a purely online movement to obtain the stability required for long term political success.
1/ I have seen the New York piece about the @hubermanlab and I want to briefly comment.
I speak here as a Christian FWIW.
The correct way to deal with interpersonal moral failings is not to publish the sin of a man in public as a form of humiliation. That isn't right.
2/ IF someone sins against you then, if it is possible to do so safely, you should go to that person directly. IF they repent, apologize, and change, then you have won the person over and addressed the matter. IF this works, you have won them over, and brought repentance...
3/
As Paul says "If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over."
This is the goal. It is our job to seek repentance and reconciliation...not revenge and humiliation.
The key word to understand when it comes to wokeness is **SUBVERT**
Woke activists destroy what they don't like (truth, facts, the constitution, etc) by SUBVERTING them.
That is, the woke undercut the power and authority of institutions and concepts they don't like.
The goal is never to show that a thing is bad, and idea is wrong, or an institution is not doing it's job. Rather, the goal is to try to obliterate the social and moral authority of the idea, goal concept, etc in order to delegitimize that idea, goal, concept, etc.
What the woke do, and what the dialectical left (including Marxists, neo-Marxists, Critical Theorists, communists, etc) do is to try to win social and political fights by subverting the validity, legitimacy, and authority of any idea they don't like.
1/ I never want to hear another word from this @kkdumez about saving democracy, or cynicism in politics.
The people that she has joined with here, particularly Rick Wilson are the most utterly nihilistic, dishonest, self-interest and Cynical people in all of politics: right or left.
Let's demonstrate this with a few words directly from Rick Wilson
🧵
2/ Rick Wilson says, we're in a culture war, and the way to win is not dialogue or discussion: it's through the use of emotion and spectacle.
he says that when someone says they worry about CRT, you don't discuss facts, you say "they're using the N-word"
That's a direct quote👇
3/ Rick Wilson was trained by Lee Atwater (video 1) And it was Lee Atwater who was responsible for the infamous "Willie Horton" ad (video2)
That's who trained Rick Wilson.
And You can see the jaded cynicism of Atwater was absorbed by Rick Wilson in the next video....
1/ "The very people in charge of disseminating education and challenging young minds have completely abandoned that task and are now wholesale focused on promoting this ideology."
@joerogan is right: woke activists hijacked education so they could indoctrinate kids.
A thread🧵
2/ In his book "The Critical Turn in Education" education professor Isaac Gottesman explains how leftist activists brought Marxism into universities and radicalized the field of education in the 70's. They wanted to put Marxism into the foundation of American education.
3/ In his book "Teachers as intellectuals" education professor Henry Giroux said his goal was to use Neo-marxism as his framework for how to do education, and that his goal was to use education as a vehicle for leftists social transformation.