Maya Forstater Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Lets talk about single sex services

As @trussliz said today the Equality Act permits the provision of services to one sex or the other
This is allowed by "exceptions" in the Equality Act 2010.

They are called exceptions because normally you shouldn't discriminate based on a protected characteristic

This is lawful age discrimination for example (allowed by an exception)
This is unlawful race discrimination (not allowed by an exception)
This is lawful sex discrimination (allowed by an exception)
This is lawful sex discrimination
This was unlawful sex discrimination
And in work: This is unlawful sex discrimination (there is no justification for wait staff to be female)
This is lawful sex discrimination (there can be justification for care staff to be one sex or the other)
There are lots of exceptions that relate to sex in the Equality Act (schools, sports, communal accommodation, employment etc..) but key ones can be found in Schedule 3 Part 7 paragraphs 26 and 27

They set out general reasons why single or separate sex service can be provided
Paragraph 26 applies to when services are provided separately for each sex.

It says you can provide services separately if this is more effective than providing them jointly (i.e. mixed/unisex)
Paragraph 27 covers single sex services. There are lots of everyday reasons, including for efficiency, where there is also a joint (unisex) option, bodily privacy, hospitals, care and services only needed by one sex.
One of the most common myths about about the single sex exceptions is that they are rarely used, or that you have to do something special to use them.

In fact they are used whenever a single sex service is lawfully provided

a-question-of-consent.net/2020/05/05/the…
Single sex services need clear and unambiguous rules.

These do not need to be negotiated by every user or every staff member.

That would lead to conflict, uncertainty, humiliation and the potential for sexual harassment and abuse
It is widely misstated that people who identify as transgender have a legal right to access single sex spaces "in line with the gender they identify with" (i.e. for the opposite sex)

This is not true.
People with the protected characteristic "gender reassignment" have the right not to be discriminated against in general.

Single and separate sex services indirectly discriminate against people who don't feel comfortable sharing with members of the same sex as them.
So it is a less discriminatory solution to also provide a joint (unisex) option where possible.

That way everyone's privacy is protected, all are provided for, and it is clear who can use which facilities.

There is no room for conflict, humiliation, or abuse of ambiguity
Sch 3 para 28 also sets out that if providing a single or separate sex service means that people with the protected characteristic gender reassignment are discriminated against this may be justified if the single sex service is a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim.
Approaches like this (this sign is said to be from Etsy's corporate HQ in the US) are not advisable.

If you policy is "The law says this, but we are going to do something else" .... consult your lawyers.
The problem for service providers in the UK is that the government @GEOgovuk and the @EHRC have for a long time given guidance which is incoherent and unworkable and not in line with the law.

a-question-of-consent.net/2020/05/25/the…
Continuing to try to muddle through with this is a bad idea.

It does no favours to transgender people - suggesting that they cannot be expected to follow rules and respect other people's privacy when it comes to sex.
It is time for clear guidance for employers and services providers, and for transgender people, which makes clear the law.

a-question-of-consent.net/2020/08/16/cro…
Obviously, this does not just apply to everyday services, but also and importantly to specialist services for women at their most vulnerable.

They are covered by the same part of the Equality Act.

The same principles apply #sexmatters

wrc.org.uk/Handlers/Downl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

Apr 10
Stonewall are reverse ferreting saying they agree with the Cass Review Image
Remember what they said before:

- hormone blockers pay a vital role in healthcare for "trans children"

web.archive.org/web/2024032909…
Image
Children should be given hormone blockers on the basis they are "reversible" without having to understand the impact of the whole course of treatment Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 3
Here we are.

Stonewall recognizes that "misgendering" is something like "criticising religion"

Is it criminal to criticise religion ? ❌

Is it harassment to criticize religion? ❌

Would it be lawful for an employer to require staff never to criticize religion? ❌
This is the same Stonewall which has trained the police forces that think "misgendering" is criminal.

The same Stonewall that never stepped in to say it wasn't, as people were arrested. Image
The same Stonewall that reported Allison Bailey to her chambers for misgendering. Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 1
On March 13 2024 I made a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office about Master McCloud, a serving judge who has been engaging publicly and inappropriately in debates on sex and gender.

forstater.com/the-judge-to-w…
The judge (who remains in post) had been posting on Linked in as "Judge in the High Court" ... The Judicial Conduct Standards say don't do this. Image
Demonstrating hostility towards people with gender critical beliefs... The Judicial Conduct Standards say don't do this. Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 20
This is just wow 🤯 Image
They conducted a survey which asked their members if the expression of gender critical beliefs creates a hostile environment for them Image
Their members compared recognizing that being a woman and being a trans-identifying man are different with apartheid Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 19
Chair of a civil service SEEN sued! This case will be big & important. Let's get it funded.

SEENs are gender-critical employee networks.

Her employer is being sued for harassment for allowing the SEEN to exist!

Elspeth is being sued for harassment.

crowdjustice.com/case/seen-chai…
What are the claims of harassment?

- She said ‘only women menstruate’.

- She posted a list of the 9 protected characteristics from the Equality Act and highlighting that gender expression, gender identity and gender are not PCs. Image
She shared a link to "my body is me" by @RooneyRach

transgendertrend.com/product/my-bod…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 19
I went to this yesterday, with my pal @charlesworth102

Professor Cooper was presenting on the findings of the £0.75m @ESRC funding research project.

We were underwhelmed. Image
As @_JVigo wrote at the start of the project in 2019 it did not define what it meant by gender or sex and consistently demonstrated a lack of understanding of bodies.

In 2024 that hadn't changed. Prof Cooper slipped between "gender" and "sex" throughout

medium.com/@julian.vigo/h…
She sounded a bit deflated.

The project hadn't delivered on its ambitious goals of offering policy and regulatory recommendations and influencing govt departments and shadow ministers.

Instead she talked of envisioning "utopias"

gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=E…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(