😂 The Pink News comedy show keeps getting funnier. Here’s @benjamincohen responding to the govt’s announcement it has rejected gender Self-ID, which he championed for 5 years. He starts with a trademark bizarre accusation, this time about genital inspections. Click here to see👇
2./ Then he tries to suck up to @trussliz claiming her rejection of Self-ID is....”sensible”. It is indeed which is why that’s been the central demand of @ALLIANCELGB since we were founded; despite furious accusations of “hatefulness” from Pink News and yep Benjamin himself.
3./ Here’s a reminder of just a few of the stories his demented rag has run demanding Self-ID in the last few months. The most recent was yesterday. 👇 In the world of Pink News no one just asks ....they plead. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🤦♂️
4/ Here’s Pink News preparing its pleady needy readers for the worst news possible ever - Literally- complete with its usual mad exaggeration. Apparently there’s an “overwhelming number” in favour of Self-ID. Yeah in the Pink News gender neutral loos maybe. 👇
5./ Here’s Pink News bewailing the PM’s lack of interest in Self ID despite more “overwhelming support”. They must be referring to a legion of copycat responses to the govt’s consultation PN urged readers to send in. The public were on a different page as they soon discovered.
6./ When Pink News asked @YouGov to poll the actual public it had to treat the results like a Japanese cook handling a deadly fugu fish: with great care. There was a small majority in favour of Self-ID among women. But what happened to overwhelming?
7./ If you wonder why misogynist PN suddenly took such an interest in women’s views it’s because there wasn’t a majority of blokes who supported Self ID and so only 50% of the entire British public were in support. Overwhelming majority? I don’t think so.👇pinknews.co.uk/2020/07/09/tra…
8./ This didn’t stop @benjamincohen giving quotes to other news outlets that were in danger of misrepresenting the results. Here he is saying the majority of the public supported Self ID👇 independent.co.uk/life-style/tra…
9./ I know denying the reality of biology may make your grasp of facts unstable but this is just weird. Maybe it was why @YouGov felt the need a week later to publish its own polling in more detail. This revealed a much more nuanced picture. 👇yougov.co.uk/topics/politic…
10./ One crucial finding was that while a majority supported transwomen being able to enter women’s single sex spaces a much larger majority was against pre-op transwomen being able to do so. It’s thought most transwomen choose to retain their male genitals.
11./ Another revealing finding was that despite an eagerness to be as kind as possible and go along with some trans demands the public were pretty evenly split as to whether they really believed trans people were the gender they said they were. 36% of the public didn’t. 👇
12./ This led to a raging article in Pink News which denounced the same company -You Gov- for daring to ask the public questions about trans people that Pink News had just paid to ask the public questions about trans people. 👇
13./ This was all of a piece with Pink News’s bias, its insane vitriol, its refusal to report factually, its pile-ons, the personal attacks,misrepresentations and witch hunts that have been such a feature of its campaign for Self ID
14/. The killer finding in You Gov’s poll was the VAST majority of the public actually support the CURRENT gender recognition process. By 63 to 16% they favoured medical diagnosis for example as well as proof of a 2 year process of transition. That’s what I call overwhelming.👇
15./ This is what makes the refusal of the govt to be bullied into compliance so uplifting for our side. They and we are in line with the public view not the ragged cadre at Pink News that increasingly resembles the strange, wide-eyed cult of the Sparrows from ‘Game of Thrones’.
16./ It’ll be fun to see whether the little Sparrows back at Pink News will now back Benjamin’s description of the govt’s approach as “sensible”. Maybe the little ones don’t appreciate how dependent their rag now is on govt adverti$ing. Kerching.👇
17./ Maybe Benjamin will soon sing the same song as @stonewalluk that calls the govt’s decision “a shocking failure of leadership”. Nancy Kelley will know all about that. We hear reports her staff are in open rebellion.👇
18./ Since Stonewall became obsessed with trans rights to the detriment of LGB people its gone from a healthy financial surplus to last year a loss of £1M. It’s said to be living off reserves. Acceptance without exceptions ....🤦♂️
19./ However they spin it the govt’s decision is a huge blow to both Pink News and Stonewall, and a solid win for our side. But it’s just a start. There’s so much work to do to roll back the capture of our institutions by the nonsense of ‘gender identity’ theory. Up and at them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵What's the Truth About Trans Surgery? 2 months ago I wrote about a surgeon who conspired with body mutilating fetishists to have his healthy legs amputated. The aptly named Neil Hopper has now been jailed. Let me tell you how his story shines a light on the trans agenda.👉
2./ It's not that Hopper claims he always wanted to be a girl. Nor that he took advice about his amputations from a cult led by Marius Gustavson, an LGBTQ+ activist who cut his penis off and kept it in a drawer. As opposed to his drawers. There's more.👉 cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-…
3./ Gustavson's two compulsions- the desire for castration and that for limb amputation- were recognised as fellow sexual paraphilias by the man who first popularised the term "gender identity" and helped set up the world's first gender clinic: Professor John Money. Who he? 👉
1. 🧵Well done to @spikedonline for criticising Stephen Fry's lazy virtue-signalling. But there is a more important fault with Fry our mainstream media overlook. "SIR" Stephen Fry consistently minimises the sexual abuse of under-age boys. It's an interest that started early. 👉
2./ Fry's first play appears to celebrate a teacher's sexual abuse of a 13 year old boy. His first novel was full of breathless descriptions of sexual acts between adults and a 15 year old boy. The adults believed the "sex" had magical curative powers.🤔
3./ Even more disturbing was a letter Fry chose to write to his younger self in 2009. The letter claimed as a 16 year old he was inspired by a rosta of obscure writers most of whom were the most vicious child-abusers imaginable. theguardian.com/media/2009/apr…
1./ There are so many brilliant insights in this analysis by @WingsScotland of Nicoliar's memoir. My favourite is Stuart's response to Sturgeon's argument, "men have never needed a GRC to access our [women's] spaces. An old trope of the trans lobby. 👉
2./ His response: "By the same logic, burglars don’t need a key to break into your house so you may as well leave all your doors and windows unlocked all the time.."😂 Stuart demolishes Sturgeon's defence of Self-ID. But there's one point she makes he should have made more of.👇
3./ Sturgeon argues all the parties were on board with Self-ID by citing a hustings "arranged by the LGBTQ+ campaign organisation Stonewall". There's something Sturgeon...a lesbian too ashamed to admit to being one until she was out of office... fails to tell her readers. 👉
1./ 🧵Solidarity with @ThePosieParker and @StandingforXX after they were banned from Glasgow University Union. I know how that feels. Many years ago the GUU banned the University's Gay Society of which I was the Chair from its premises. When we picketed the GUU we were attacked.
2./ We were spat on and buckets of urine were thrown over us from the roof. When, as a protest, I stood as a candidate to be GUU President I was physically attacked. Blubbery misogynist and then member of the GUU board John Nicolson said nothing. Of course he didn't.
3./ The GUU used to show porn every Friday to prove it was anti-feminist. It hosted debates like 'Is Rape a Female Fantasy?'. It may identify as woke now but when it bans women defending their right to speak it's reverting to its misogynistic origins. youtube.com/live/jX7c_GN8y…
🧵1./ What's the connection between puberty blockers and paedophilia? My latest article -the most important I've written- explores how pro-paedophile intellectuals in the 1990s laid the groundwork for puberty blockers. You won't believe how blatantly pro-paedophile they were.
2./ The decade began with the publication in 1990 of 'Sexual Personae' by Camille Paglia. She opposes puberty blockers but her book helped foster a pro-paedophile culture which assumed children were able to consent to radical decisions about their sexual development.
3./ Paglia argued, "male pedophilia is intricately intertwined with the cardinal moments of Western civilization". She said sexologist John Money was her biggest inspiration. He gave an interview in 1991 to paedophile magazine 'Paidika' defending child sexual abuse as harmless.
1./ 🧵HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT.
It's been an honour to work with @Women_of_Surrey on their campaign to close down @PrideInSurrey because it refuses to take child safeguarding seriously. Here's a clip from the new video @MrMennoTweets and made for @Women_of_Surrey. Please RT.
2./ Our video highights how institutions who have a duty to protect children were so desperate to virtue-signal about "LGBTQ+ rights" they effectively enabled the predation of Stephen Ireland, founder and CEO of @PrideInSurrey. He was jailed for drugging and rxping a 12 year old.
3./ While organisations like @SurreyPolice, Surrey County Council, schools (including for the disabled) the local Fire Brigade and even @THORPEPARK rushed to associate themselves with Ireland he was sending texts fantasising about abducting and even mutilxting them.