Mihir Shah Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
India sticking to her guns. Interesting bit about the commitment not to bring more troops to the front. Is it possible that the Chinese got spooked by how quickly the IA brought in multiple divisions of infantry, and are looking for a face-saving exit?
Of course, "stop sending more troops" is just the kind of commitment that is easy to make but very difficult for the other side to verify. Note that at this point, no one really knows how many soldiers India has deployed in the theatre.😈
So what did China gain from this "adventure". Let's try to make a list shall we?
- It gained ground on the northern bank of Pangong. Which is terrible terrain to mount any sort of offensive that penetrates into Indian territory in depth.
- It lost the tactical advantage on the Southern bank, which *is* useful terrain for mechanised formations to operate in.
- At Galwan, if accounts from the ground are to be believed, the PLA got badly mauled, and had to pull back many kilometres into its own territory.
- Hot springs: stalemate.
- Depsang: Some tactical gains that were blunted by the Indian deployment of mechanised forces.
- At a strategic level, it brought upon itself what @somnath1978 rightly calls the "LoC-ization" of the LAC. For a military that is looking to make deep cuts in manpower and allocate an increasing share of its resources to oceanic warfare, this is a terrible outcome.
India has no territorial ambitions in Ladakh. It can afford to wait out the PLA. The PLA, meanwhile, has to focus on breaking past the first island chain in the Pacific. Which requires dozens of bases in the SCS, hundreds (thousands?) of aircraft, and scores of warships. Image
Japan, SoKo, Taiwan, Australia, and the US are already building up their own forces in response to the Chinese buildup. The former two are now building aircraft carriers capable of supporting F-35s, the US is reinforcing its own island bases while pouring $20 billion into PACOM.
At such a juncture, what does the Chinese leadership decide to do? Get itself into a quagmire 5,000 km away from its demographic centre of gravity, via tenuous supply lines.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mihir Shah

Mihir Shah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @elmihiro

Apr 7, 2022
This is an interesting thread in that it illustrates how the Russian ground forces are set up very differently from US forces.
In short, the Russians treat indirect fires as the primary element, with maneuver forces only helping artillery get into position and seizing an objective after it has been devastated.
So the artillery footprint is very large, and the firepower is incredible, although imprecise.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 25, 2022
Practically every great power has developed their own unique doctrines for war, and their equipment designs have flowed from that. Strange that a son-of-the-soil type gets it, but our intelligent, highly educated scholars don’t.
Assault Breaker is a prime example, but history is littered with several examples.
Maybe that right there is the bane of India. It has been run by too many Srinath Raghavans for too long 😶
Read 4 tweets
Feb 17, 2022
I wish to make a few points with respect to Adm. Prakash and Maj. Gen Hukku's conclusion in this piece. Qiuck thread.
The authors state that in confronting China, "The last option would, obviously, be to maintain the status quo — with 50,000-60,000 troops deployed at high altitudes..."
I want to argue that forcing a standoff along the land border should be India's *first* option, as this is where India's strengths lie.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 15, 2022
1. Airlines have very stringent safety rules. Attendants can move people elsewhere from the exit row if they deem them unfit to carry out emergency duties in case of a crash. Individual passengers' convenience does not trump that.
2. Walking off the plane "all sprightly" is no sign of fitness to open the exit door in case of a crash landing.
3. Making up false stories because you think you were slighted, using your former rank and blue tick as a bully pulpit, getting your buddies in the media to publish a hit piece in record time—these are all signs of the same "VIP culture" that you claim to condemn.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 8, 2021
Why is HAL—a company with 50+ years in the aero industry—being denied the opportunity to take over and rebuild Air India? Why is the crown jewel of Indian hospitality being sold to a private company whose name literally translates to “bye-bye”?
Reached for comment, strategic expert Patanajali Varadarajan said, “This is a disturbing breakdown in India’s values-based governance system. It speaks to the moral fiber of the United States that it has not nationalized a single government-owned airline.”
Renowned professor Gaurav Sabnis tweeted, “This changes nothing. The Indian air travel system was always a Brahminical setup. A high-quality, imported system called “Air Force” for the ruling elites; and a poorly funded and managed “Air India” for everyone else.”
Read 8 tweets
May 17, 2021
The mayor of Mumbai had said, “They've to install their cold storage if needed … We'll not give any advance payment. We will fine companies if they fail to deliver vaccines on time.”

Do people still think that importing vaccines on short timelines is easy, or even feasible?
Meanwhile, this is what Israel *actually* did to get ahead of the line:
The Israeli PM initiated direct negotiations with Pfizer's CEO, with over 17 phone calls. Those calls were made possible by paying a $30 million advance just to negotiate. No guarantees.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(