India sticking to her guns. Interesting bit about the commitment not to bring more troops to the front. Is it possible that the Chinese got spooked by how quickly the IA brought in multiple divisions of infantry, and are looking for a face-saving exit?
Of course, "stop sending more troops" is just the kind of commitment that is easy to make but very difficult for the other side to verify. Note that at this point, no one really knows how many soldiers India has deployed in the theatre.😈
So what did China gain from this "adventure". Let's try to make a list shall we?
- It gained ground on the northern bank of Pangong. Which is terrible terrain to mount any sort of offensive that penetrates into Indian territory in depth.
- It lost the tactical advantage on the Southern bank, which *is* useful terrain for mechanised formations to operate in.
- At Galwan, if accounts from the ground are to be believed, the PLA got badly mauled, and had to pull back many kilometres into its own territory.
- Hot springs: stalemate.
- Depsang: Some tactical gains that were blunted by the Indian deployment of mechanised forces.
- At a strategic level, it brought upon itself what @somnath1978 rightly calls the "LoC-ization" of the LAC. For a military that is looking to make deep cuts in manpower and allocate an increasing share of its resources to oceanic warfare, this is a terrible outcome.
India has no territorial ambitions in Ladakh. It can afford to wait out the PLA. The PLA, meanwhile, has to focus on breaking past the first island chain in the Pacific. Which requires dozens of bases in the SCS, hundreds (thousands?) of aircraft, and scores of warships.
Japan, SoKo, Taiwan, Australia, and the US are already building up their own forces in response to the Chinese buildup. The former two are now building aircraft carriers capable of supporting F-35s, the US is reinforcing its own island bases while pouring $20 billion into PACOM.
At such a juncture, what does the Chinese leadership decide to do? Get itself into a quagmire 5,000 km away from its demographic centre of gravity, via tenuous supply lines.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Credible claims:
- 🇮🇳 executed strikes on terrorist infra in several locations in Pak.
- 🇮🇳 managed to destroy vital infra at nearly all PAF bases. These strikes were mostly symbolic.
- 🇵🇰 shot down at least two manned Indian aircraft.
Semi-credible claims:
- 🇮🇳 destroyed AWACS/fighters inside a hangar.
- 🇮🇳 targeted and damaged Pakistan nuke storage/command sites.
- 🇵🇰 shot down three or more manned Indian aircraft.
Thread on "Human Error" or "Pilot Error". These are widely misunderstood terms, and that lack of understanding is being used to float unhinged conspiracy theories. 🧵
People often see "human error" as an indictment of the pilot, an accusation that he or she made a mistake that could have been avoided. That is not so. It’s more about the limits of human interaction with fast-moving machines in high-pressure situations.
The human body has a natural sense of balance which ensures that people doing everyday activities don’t fall over. That sense hasn’t evolved to deal with high-speed flight in difficult conditions (say dense fog that blanks out all visual references). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_of_…
Patio furniture procured from Home Depot demonstrates how dependent the two countries are on the US for critical needs despite their professed independence.
Putin has his hands clasped tightly, while Modi's has cupped his palms together, demonstrating Russia's unwillingness/inability to provide what India wants despite Indian requests.
In short, the Russians treat indirect fires as the primary element, with maneuver forces only helping artillery get into position and seizing an objective after it has been devastated.
So the artillery footprint is very large, and the firepower is incredible, although imprecise.
Quick thread: Some I lessons learned, not from the Ukraine invasion in particular, but in following domestic/international crises and conflicts over the last few years, and from life in general. Nearly all arise out of my own failures/missteps/botch-ups.
1. Things aren't always what they seem at the start. Finding accurate information in a sea of propaganda is close to impossible. Wait for a situation to develop; don't celebrate/surrender prematurely.
2. Most real-time commentary (a.k.a OSINT) is garbage. The worst is often peddled by anonymous handles.