Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 92 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Delhi HC begins hearing Mehul Choksi's appeal against the dismissal of his writ petition seeking pre-screening of Bad Boy Billionaires.

#BadBoyBillionaires

@NetflixIndia

#Netflix #MehulChoksi
Appeal listed before Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan.
Netflix India has filed it's reply. UOI has filed a short reply. There's no response from Netflix Inc: Adv Namit Joshi for Choksi.

@NetflixIndia
You don't want to file anything else?: Court asks Adv Vijay Aggarwal, counsel for Choksi

No, matter is ripe for hearing : Aggarwal
My prayer is that the matter remanded back. I'm on the question of maintainability of my writ petition. I want a re-match before the Single Judge: Aggarwal
Has your client joined any investigation?: Court

Yes, through video conferencing. He has been chargesheeted in some. Investigation in some: Aggarwal
There a High Court order staying summons issued to him in four cases: Aggarwal
For Art 226, your conduct is important. You are not a citizen anymore. Your basic case is that there has to be a fair trial. But for that there has to be trial. You are sitting in Antigua: Court
Why not pursue civil remedies as per the Single Judge's order: Court
I will show.. it takes away a right of mine : Aggarwal
I would like a determination by the Single Judge. The Single Judge's order is non-speaking : Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads the order passed by the Single Judge.
This order should go for being a non- speaking order. It is the duty of a sovereign to regulate content. Third, courts must interfere in case of infringement of fundamental rights : Aggarwal
What happened to the serial? : Court

There are others like me. Two of them filed petitions.. as of today, it has not been released: Aggarwal
Subrato Roy got an ex parte stay from a Bihar Court. Supreme Court asked me to go to HC. R Raju also got an ex parte stay. Matter is coming before Hyderabad HC tomorrow. Not releasing the series is a commerical decision. Plea in transfer Petition has been issued by SC: NK Kaul
Senior Adv Neeraj Kishan Kaul appears for Netflix.
Transfer Petition does not cover this proceeding: Kaul
Long and short of it is that the series has not been released: Aggarwal
What is the issue with filing a civil suit?: Court

It will be a wrong precedent. It is my fundamental right. It is an important question of law: Aggarwal
I showed a no of judgements. They were binding judgements. Ld Single Judge said that I am not dealing with this: Aggarwal
Order has to be speaking otherwise the appellate court cannot perform its functions: Aggarwal
The judgements that you cited were on maintainability nor merits?: Court

Maintainability: Aggarwal
Reasons are flesh and blood of a judicial order: Aggarwal reads a judgement.
Discretion is a science and it must be spelled out : Aggarwal
On the first day before the Single Judge, I relied upon the order passed in Batla House case. The convict sought a preview: Aggarwal
My prayer was only for a preview. I showed the Batla House order. My writ petition was maintainable : Aggarwal
Were the modifications in Batla House by consent? : Court

I appeared in Batla House. It was by consent: Kaul

Consent will come after preview. I'm still on preview: Aggarwal
There was a clearance from CBFC in that case. That case was different. There was an order by a public authority: Court
I'm only showing that such indulgence is not foreign. Scope of Art 226 is wide.. : Aggarwal
A PIL on regulating OTT platforms was disposed of. Court had said IT Act covered the issue: Aggarwal
They talk of hacking, pornography, tempering, cyber terrorism etc. These don't relate to Choksi's case: Aggarwal
Suppose Netflix says that only a particular religion can subscribe to it or it starts showing Chinese propoganda.. will Courts not interfere? We can stop tik tok and other Chinese apps but Netflix is above all?: Aggarwal

#Netflix @NetflixIndia
Let's point out any section in IT Act where I have an alternate remedy. I'll go under the IT Act. When I'm being tried and investigated in India.. whether I join or not.. investigation is going on. It is the duty of the sovereign to protect me: Aggarwal
My prayer for regulation of content on Netflix cannot be granted by a civil court: Aggarwal
The Division Bench judgement which was relied upon by the Single Judhe pertained to regulation of content on OTT platforms and it was held that the mischief was covered by IT Act: Aggarwal
IT Act does not deal with fundamental rights: Aggarwal
I'm defending people under IT Act everyday: Aggarwal as he refers to various chapters under IT Act

Let us also read it. We have to catch up to your superior knowledge: Court
Sec 69 also deals with investigation for any offence: Court

Offences are in Chapter 11. I am not covered: Aggarwal
I like to give remedy in criminal law if possible: Aggarwal

But you have an allergy to civil suit: Court
Aggarwal reads IT Act provisions.
Can there be a preview ? : Aggarwal as he reads Section 69 IT Act
Section 69 gives power to facilitate investigate : Aggarwal
I'm not covered under provisions which can block access : Aggarwal
There is no provision under IT Act which can block content which infringes fundamental rights: Aggarwal
Till IT Act says Sec 69A will be applicable to breach of fundamental rights, I will come to the courts: Aggarwal
On one side you say IT Act is your remedy but section 61 IT Act bars jurisdiction of civil court. I'm left without a remedy: Aggarwal
When I knock the doors of a constitutional court, it will not show me the door. A right is guaranteed to be in the same book which gave birth to this court : Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads judgements in his favour.
In the past, in writ jurisdiction, orders have been against Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. I can give a list : Aggarwal
The world is dynamic. With changing times law and understanding must evolve. They are generating 400 crores of revenue from India: Aggarwal
There must be judicial control on fast expanding maze of entities which impact rights of persons .. technicalities should not come in the way of relief under Art 226: Aggarwal reads a judgement.
Aggarwal summarises his arguments.
I've not argued on merits and facts: Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads a judgment on fair trial.

They can call me (Mehul Choksi) anything. This is it : Aggarwal
Let the single Judge decide the case on merit.. otherwise one of us will lose our chance to appeal: Aggarwal

Civil remedy is available to you. In a writ petition, the conduct of the petitioner is relevant: Court
Art 226 does not say that it is only for some and not for others: Aggarwal

There's no trial against you today: Court

Let the State make a statement that I'm not under investigation: Aggarwal
Today someone who wants a a fair trial and investigation, is his conduct consistent with this desire? : Court
Disputed question is whether I'm entitled to indulgence under Art 226. Infringement of my right is not disputed. I left India before FIR was registered: Aggarwal

When did you leave India? When did you renounce your citizenship?: Court
India is contesting my citizenship before an Antiguan Court. I have a heart condition. I had to go to Miami which is at least 24 hours from India : Aggarwal
These COVID times. I anyway can't travel. I am seeking joining of investigation through video conferencing: Aggarwal
Lalit Modi was granted relief by this Court: Aggarwal
Whether your conduct is consistent with your claim to fair trial?: Court
Aggarwal reads Jessica Lal judgement to show the importance of fair trial.
I left India on 4.1.2018 for medical treatment. On 15 Jan, I took oath of allegiance in Antigua. Mumbai Police gave an NOC that there are no cases pending against me: Aggarwal
You moved to New York first? In 11 days you swore allegiance to Antigua? What happened ?: Court

Reality is stranger than fiction. My heart treatment was in New York. Antigua and New York are four hours away: Aggarwal
I am complete medical record. There was no prelim enquiry against me. 30.01.2018 was the first FIR by CBI. Complaint was on 29.01.2018: Aggarwal
Till that day I was a good citizen.. Indian law presumes me to be innocent...All communications to me were responded to. Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya can't challenge the Netflix show because they are declared fugitives: Aggarwal
Once you are declared a fugitive, all your civil rights are suspended. I have a stay order in my favour. I can't be declared a fugitive. I'm not a fugitive. My civil rights are there: Aggarwal
Single Judge did not go into such questions. Single Judge says that in view of Division Bench order, writ was not maintainable. Single Judge didn't even see my face. He didn't let me enter. So this court should also not see my face: Aggarwal
In Justice Swatantra Kumar case, this case stopped all reporting. It happened in Jindal case and then Shashi Tharoor case: Aggarwal
Those were defamation suits. HC granted relief for protection of Article 21: Aggarwal
Please see the conduct of Netflix also: Aggarwal

You are the person who approached the writ court: Court
Netflix is discharging public function. Their content is seen by millions of people : Aggarwal
Is this issue pending before Surpreme Court?: Court

I'm not aware. I plead ignorance: Aggarwal
Aggarwal concludes his arguments.
Senior Adv Kaul for Netflix begins.

@NetflixIndia

The entire writ petition was based on a trailer which did not even mention Mehul Choksi. It's on Nirav Modi. In the episode, he is shown for 2 mins: Kaul
It was a speculative writ which said that please regulate OTT content : Kaul
Writ is an extraordinary remedy. It cannot be issued is vacuum. Court asked him which trial was on. Not a single answer: Kaul
He has not joined investigation. His answer is that I've offered to join investigation through video conferencing. There is a red alert notice against him: Kaul
For all practical purposes, he is an absconder: Kaul
The Single Judge rightly held that it was bound by the Division Bench order which recorded the Govt's stand on OTT platforms not being regulated right now: Kaul
If there is an alternative remedy under IT Act, avail it. You also have civil suit remedy. Single Judge doens't direct him to to pursue IT Act remedy: Kaul
In Sahara case, media published details. Surpreme Court then laid down certain guidelines. The Supreme Court didn't say there should be pre publication injunction: Kaul
Surpreme Court said that an injunction may be granted in an appropriate case for a limited time. This is a case of possible trial: Kaul
What's his grievance based on? He doesn't say which trial is on. No judgement says that writ jurisdiction can be expanded to this level : Kaul
Batla House was a flim based on police diary. It had CBFC certification. The trial was on in that case. In that background the court said could you give more disclaimers: Kaul
Surpreme Court has said that injunction orders in sub judice matters should be far and few: Kaul
There is not right to privacy when it is already in public domain. These are not issues when you agitate right to privacy: Kaul
I've seen the episode . It is based on interviews, snippets, books etc. A source chart is there. We've taken his interview: Kaul
Court proceeds to adjourn hearing.
We will hear you at length: Court
Matter to be heard next on September 29.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 1
Supreme Court hears a plea related to Viktoriia Basu, a Russian mother who absconded with her 4-year-old son amid an ongoing custody battle with her Indian husband.

The Court had earlier directed the Centre to trace her after she reportedly went missing with the child.

Bench: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymala BagchiImage
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati informs the Court that the investigation has reached a stage where diplomatic channels are being engaged.

She submits that steps are being taken with Nepal, UAE, and Russia, as these appear to be the directions in which Viktoriia Basu has moved.
Justice Kant tells ASG Aishwarya Bhati that the child was not in the custody of either parent, but under the custody of the Supreme Court itself—hence, the matter is being taken very seriously as the child was taken from the Court’s custody.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 1
Supreme Court hears a Public Interest Litigation seeking ban on betting apps and stringent regulations for online gaming and fantasy sports.

Bench: Justice Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi Image
In may 2025, Supreme Court on sought response from a Union Government and observed that it will consider issuing notice to States at a later stage if it deems necessary.

Read full report here;barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Counsel: There is a same matter going on in court number 9 on the same matter.

Dr. KA Paul( petitioner is person): My prayer is specific.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 31
Supreme Court hears the plea by son of former parliamentarian Mohan Delkar and a complainant in the abetment to suicide case of his father, Abhinav Delkar assailing the Bombay High Court ruling to quash the FIR against nine accused including Praful Patel, administrator of Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Diu and Daman, and Lakshadweep 'to prevent abuse of law'

Sr Adv Meenakshi Arora appears for the petitionerImage
Arora: He says the deputy collector and the administrator misbehaved..

CJI: show us who.. where is it mentioned

Arora: I will show.. this is the humiliation.. it's there in his suicide note also
CJI: but can this humiliation be said to compel leading to suicide. If a lawyer is humiliated by judge saying your client has chosen an idiot person to represent him or that the lawyer is stupid and does not know anything..then after 3 days he commits suicide. Will the judge be held responsible under section 306 IPC. In Bombay HC I have quashed so many such cases.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 31
#Breaking Terrosim has no religion but conviction cannot be based on moral grounds, NIA Court acquitts all seven accused including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur in the 2008 Malegaon blast case.

An explosion that occured on September 29, 2009 at Malegaon, Nashik had killed six people and injured over 100.Image
Special Judge AK Lahoti while acquitting all 7 observed that the prosecution failed to bring any 'cogent evidence' and therfore requires court to extend the benefit of doubt to all accused.
Regarding charges against Sadhvi Pragya, the court observed that the prosecution failed to prove that the bike on which the bomb was allegedly strapped belonged to her.

Serial number of the chasis was not completely recovered by the forensic experts and therefore the prosecution failed to prove that the bike Infact belonged to her.

Moreover, Thakur had become a sanyasi and had left all material things two years before the blast.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 30
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai to shortly address the felicitation function organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA).

#SupremeCourt #CJI #felicitationceremony Image
SCBA President Vikas Singh addresses the ceremony
Vikas Singh: it’s a matter of privilege for me to do this for CJI Gavai. He was very reluctant to accept this function since he felt that a better occasion will be when he demits office and I speak about what he has done for the bar and for the institution rather than speak when he’s entering office.
Read 28 tweets
Jul 30
Delhi High Court is hearing the petition filed by accused Mohd Javed challenging the release of the movie Udaipur Files. Image
The matter is being heard by Chief Justice Devendra kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela
Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswamy for petitioner Javed- 160 witnesses remain to be examined. I am entitled to fair trial under Art 21. First proposition is my right to fair trial is jeopardised by the relase of this movie.
Read 55 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(