Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 92 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Delhi HC begins hearing Mehul Choksi's appeal against the dismissal of his writ petition seeking pre-screening of Bad Boy Billionaires.

#BadBoyBillionaires

@NetflixIndia

#Netflix #MehulChoksi
Appeal listed before Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan.
Netflix India has filed it's reply. UOI has filed a short reply. There's no response from Netflix Inc: Adv Namit Joshi for Choksi.

@NetflixIndia
You don't want to file anything else?: Court asks Adv Vijay Aggarwal, counsel for Choksi

No, matter is ripe for hearing : Aggarwal
My prayer is that the matter remanded back. I'm on the question of maintainability of my writ petition. I want a re-match before the Single Judge: Aggarwal
Has your client joined any investigation?: Court

Yes, through video conferencing. He has been chargesheeted in some. Investigation in some: Aggarwal
There a High Court order staying summons issued to him in four cases: Aggarwal
For Art 226, your conduct is important. You are not a citizen anymore. Your basic case is that there has to be a fair trial. But for that there has to be trial. You are sitting in Antigua: Court
Why not pursue civil remedies as per the Single Judge's order: Court
I will show.. it takes away a right of mine : Aggarwal
I would like a determination by the Single Judge. The Single Judge's order is non-speaking : Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads the order passed by the Single Judge.
This order should go for being a non- speaking order. It is the duty of a sovereign to regulate content. Third, courts must interfere in case of infringement of fundamental rights : Aggarwal
What happened to the serial? : Court

There are others like me. Two of them filed petitions.. as of today, it has not been released: Aggarwal
Subrato Roy got an ex parte stay from a Bihar Court. Supreme Court asked me to go to HC. R Raju also got an ex parte stay. Matter is coming before Hyderabad HC tomorrow. Not releasing the series is a commerical decision. Plea in transfer Petition has been issued by SC: NK Kaul
Senior Adv Neeraj Kishan Kaul appears for Netflix.
Transfer Petition does not cover this proceeding: Kaul
Long and short of it is that the series has not been released: Aggarwal
What is the issue with filing a civil suit?: Court

It will be a wrong precedent. It is my fundamental right. It is an important question of law: Aggarwal
I showed a no of judgements. They were binding judgements. Ld Single Judge said that I am not dealing with this: Aggarwal
Order has to be speaking otherwise the appellate court cannot perform its functions: Aggarwal
The judgements that you cited were on maintainability nor merits?: Court

Maintainability: Aggarwal
Reasons are flesh and blood of a judicial order: Aggarwal reads a judgement.
Discretion is a science and it must be spelled out : Aggarwal
On the first day before the Single Judge, I relied upon the order passed in Batla House case. The convict sought a preview: Aggarwal
My prayer was only for a preview. I showed the Batla House order. My writ petition was maintainable : Aggarwal
Were the modifications in Batla House by consent? : Court

I appeared in Batla House. It was by consent: Kaul

Consent will come after preview. I'm still on preview: Aggarwal
There was a clearance from CBFC in that case. That case was different. There was an order by a public authority: Court
I'm only showing that such indulgence is not foreign. Scope of Art 226 is wide.. : Aggarwal
A PIL on regulating OTT platforms was disposed of. Court had said IT Act covered the issue: Aggarwal
They talk of hacking, pornography, tempering, cyber terrorism etc. These don't relate to Choksi's case: Aggarwal
Suppose Netflix says that only a particular religion can subscribe to it or it starts showing Chinese propoganda.. will Courts not interfere? We can stop tik tok and other Chinese apps but Netflix is above all?: Aggarwal

#Netflix @NetflixIndia
Let's point out any section in IT Act where I have an alternate remedy. I'll go under the IT Act. When I'm being tried and investigated in India.. whether I join or not.. investigation is going on. It is the duty of the sovereign to protect me: Aggarwal
My prayer for regulation of content on Netflix cannot be granted by a civil court: Aggarwal
The Division Bench judgement which was relied upon by the Single Judhe pertained to regulation of content on OTT platforms and it was held that the mischief was covered by IT Act: Aggarwal
IT Act does not deal with fundamental rights: Aggarwal
I'm defending people under IT Act everyday: Aggarwal as he refers to various chapters under IT Act

Let us also read it. We have to catch up to your superior knowledge: Court
Sec 69 also deals with investigation for any offence: Court

Offences are in Chapter 11. I am not covered: Aggarwal
I like to give remedy in criminal law if possible: Aggarwal

But you have an allergy to civil suit: Court
Aggarwal reads IT Act provisions.
Can there be a preview ? : Aggarwal as he reads Section 69 IT Act
Section 69 gives power to facilitate investigate : Aggarwal
I'm not covered under provisions which can block access : Aggarwal
There is no provision under IT Act which can block content which infringes fundamental rights: Aggarwal
Till IT Act says Sec 69A will be applicable to breach of fundamental rights, I will come to the courts: Aggarwal
On one side you say IT Act is your remedy but section 61 IT Act bars jurisdiction of civil court. I'm left without a remedy: Aggarwal
When I knock the doors of a constitutional court, it will not show me the door. A right is guaranteed to be in the same book which gave birth to this court : Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads judgements in his favour.
In the past, in writ jurisdiction, orders have been against Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. I can give a list : Aggarwal
The world is dynamic. With changing times law and understanding must evolve. They are generating 400 crores of revenue from India: Aggarwal
There must be judicial control on fast expanding maze of entities which impact rights of persons .. technicalities should not come in the way of relief under Art 226: Aggarwal reads a judgement.
Aggarwal summarises his arguments.
I've not argued on merits and facts: Aggarwal
Aggarwal reads a judgment on fair trial.

They can call me (Mehul Choksi) anything. This is it : Aggarwal
Let the single Judge decide the case on merit.. otherwise one of us will lose our chance to appeal: Aggarwal

Civil remedy is available to you. In a writ petition, the conduct of the petitioner is relevant: Court
Art 226 does not say that it is only for some and not for others: Aggarwal

There's no trial against you today: Court

Let the State make a statement that I'm not under investigation: Aggarwal
Today someone who wants a a fair trial and investigation, is his conduct consistent with this desire? : Court
Disputed question is whether I'm entitled to indulgence under Art 226. Infringement of my right is not disputed. I left India before FIR was registered: Aggarwal

When did you leave India? When did you renounce your citizenship?: Court
India is contesting my citizenship before an Antiguan Court. I have a heart condition. I had to go to Miami which is at least 24 hours from India : Aggarwal
These COVID times. I anyway can't travel. I am seeking joining of investigation through video conferencing: Aggarwal
Lalit Modi was granted relief by this Court: Aggarwal
Whether your conduct is consistent with your claim to fair trial?: Court
Aggarwal reads Jessica Lal judgement to show the importance of fair trial.
I left India on 4.1.2018 for medical treatment. On 15 Jan, I took oath of allegiance in Antigua. Mumbai Police gave an NOC that there are no cases pending against me: Aggarwal
You moved to New York first? In 11 days you swore allegiance to Antigua? What happened ?: Court

Reality is stranger than fiction. My heart treatment was in New York. Antigua and New York are four hours away: Aggarwal
I am complete medical record. There was no prelim enquiry against me. 30.01.2018 was the first FIR by CBI. Complaint was on 29.01.2018: Aggarwal
Till that day I was a good citizen.. Indian law presumes me to be innocent...All communications to me were responded to. Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya can't challenge the Netflix show because they are declared fugitives: Aggarwal
Once you are declared a fugitive, all your civil rights are suspended. I have a stay order in my favour. I can't be declared a fugitive. I'm not a fugitive. My civil rights are there: Aggarwal
Single Judge did not go into such questions. Single Judge says that in view of Division Bench order, writ was not maintainable. Single Judge didn't even see my face. He didn't let me enter. So this court should also not see my face: Aggarwal
In Justice Swatantra Kumar case, this case stopped all reporting. It happened in Jindal case and then Shashi Tharoor case: Aggarwal
Those were defamation suits. HC granted relief for protection of Article 21: Aggarwal
Please see the conduct of Netflix also: Aggarwal

You are the person who approached the writ court: Court
Netflix is discharging public function. Their content is seen by millions of people : Aggarwal
Is this issue pending before Surpreme Court?: Court

I'm not aware. I plead ignorance: Aggarwal
Aggarwal concludes his arguments.
Senior Adv Kaul for Netflix begins.

@NetflixIndia

The entire writ petition was based on a trailer which did not even mention Mehul Choksi. It's on Nirav Modi. In the episode, he is shown for 2 mins: Kaul
It was a speculative writ which said that please regulate OTT content : Kaul
Writ is an extraordinary remedy. It cannot be issued is vacuum. Court asked him which trial was on. Not a single answer: Kaul
He has not joined investigation. His answer is that I've offered to join investigation through video conferencing. There is a red alert notice against him: Kaul
For all practical purposes, he is an absconder: Kaul
The Single Judge rightly held that it was bound by the Division Bench order which recorded the Govt's stand on OTT platforms not being regulated right now: Kaul
If there is an alternative remedy under IT Act, avail it. You also have civil suit remedy. Single Judge doens't direct him to to pursue IT Act remedy: Kaul
In Sahara case, media published details. Surpreme Court then laid down certain guidelines. The Supreme Court didn't say there should be pre publication injunction: Kaul
Surpreme Court said that an injunction may be granted in an appropriate case for a limited time. This is a case of possible trial: Kaul
What's his grievance based on? He doesn't say which trial is on. No judgement says that writ jurisdiction can be expanded to this level : Kaul
Batla House was a flim based on police diary. It had CBFC certification. The trial was on in that case. In that background the court said could you give more disclaimers: Kaul
Surpreme Court has said that injunction orders in sub judice matters should be far and few: Kaul
There is not right to privacy when it is already in public domain. These are not issues when you agitate right to privacy: Kaul
I've seen the episode . It is based on interviews, snippets, books etc. A source chart is there. We've taken his interview: Kaul
Court proceeds to adjourn hearing.
We will hear you at length: Court
Matter to be heard next on September 29.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 22
Supreme Court hears appeal against Allahabad HC order upholding the trial court’s order permitting a court-monitored survey of the Sambhal Masjid

Justice PS Narasimha: It is being argued that this case has to be seen from the lens of Places of Worship Act, 1991

Adv Vishnu Shankar Jain: Just by saying that the act is attracted does not attract the 1991 act.Image
SC: Question is survey arising out of 1991 act or the ASI act..

Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi: They say 1991 act does not apply..HC says there is no bar..I am in appeal and in meanwhile all surveys were stated.

Jain: On the face of it

Justice Narasimha: Yes you have a point that it is not concerned with 1991 act.. and HC gave finding against the Muslim side.. so we need to hear this.. the challenge is pending here...
SC: Mr Jain appearing for Respondent 3 to 8 takes notice of the SLP. It is surprising as to how two appeals have been filed by the same parties.

Jain: In court 4 item 10 has been dismissed.

Ahmadi: it is the mathura case...

SC: we were about to issue notice.

Justice Narasimha: Let us take a look at court 4 item 10 order.. we do not want to pass inconsistent orders. Let it be listed on Monday.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 22
Supreme Court to resume hearing the Bihar SIR case today

Earlier the top court had asked the Election Commission of India @ECISVEEP to upload online the list of 65 lakh voters proposed to be deleted during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025 Image
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi for the Election Commission of India: We have complied with it letter and spirit. Apart from BLA and panchayat we have also pasted this outside police stations.

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025
Dwivedi: Anyone wrongly excluded can file form with supporting documents.

Adv Prashant Bhushan: they have complied with the direction but the problem which has arisen

Dwivedi: Please see para 3.
Read 22 tweets
Aug 22
Supreme Court to shortly pronounce judgment on petitions seeking stay on suo motu directions passed Justice JB Pardiwala led bench to remove the stray dogs in Delhi NCR #StrayDogs #SupremeCourt Image
Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan had observed that the menace of dog bites directly infringes the fundamental rights of citizens under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21 of the Constitution.

The Court had noted that over 25,000 dog bite cases were reported in Delhi in 2024, with over 3,000 in January 2025 alone, and that sterilisation rules had failed to control the problem over the past two
Thereafter a three-judge Bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria heard pleas seeking stay on the order passed by Justice Pardiwala led bench.

Judgment at 10:30 am

#StrayDogs Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 20
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant to shortly speak at the inaugural lecture series organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA).

The lecture is titled “Justice for all- Legal Aid and Mediation: The collaborative role of Bar and the Bench”

#SupremeCourt #SCBAImage
Sr. Adv. Vikas Singh (President, SCBA): Justice for all and mediation go hand in hand. It is only in the mediation process that there are no losers. In litigation there is one side which feels that it has not got justice. In mediation both sides feel like they have got justice. Justice for all is embedded in the concept of mediation.
Singh: the bar and bench should always to first think of settlement when it comes to any litigation. As litigation goes further, bitterness increases. If bar and bench both play a role in mediation and legal aid process, it will be a big opening in this subject. Today we have 5.36cr pending cases in the country. If mediation succeeds in this country it will drastically and overnight reduce the pendency of cases in this country. It can unclog the system. And ensure people in this country get justice.
Read 31 tweets
Aug 19
Supreme Court hears a plea seeking to prevent the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) from demolishing historical monuments and Sufi saints’ graves in Delhi’s Mehrauli.

Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan Image
J Nagarathna: Why do you want to demolish it?

Counsel for DDA: It is a forest area.....we are against ancillary construction that come with Dargah.

J R Mahadevan: There is an express order there shall be no construction
Advocate Nizam Pasha referred to the Court’s previous order, contending that since the ASI has established the Dargah as a 12th-century monument, the opinion of the religious committee holds no relevance.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 18
Delhi High Court is hearing on behalf of Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA) seeking intervention in the copyright infringement suit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against Open AI. Image
The matter is being heard by Justice Amit Bansal.
Senior Rajshekhar Rao appearing for DNPA - It reduces my inventive to create. If ChatGPT is 'ChaatGPT' then..At some point a large chunk of my population will die. The distinguishing feature in US law is that it does not recognise storage.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(