DAY 12 of #JulianAssange's extradition hearing is about to start. Our live tweets are on this thread.
Join us at 5pm BST for Joe Lauria @unjoe's daily report on #CNLive!
Today's witnesses are expected to be Dr Quinton Deeley, an honorary consultant psychiatrist in the National Autism Unit, Adult ADHD Service, and Behavioural Genetics and Autism Assessment Clinic & Paul Mullen, Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at Monash Uni, Melbourne.
Court in session. Evidence of alarming prison incident is handed to Judge Baraitser. It concerned a razor blade found in #Assange's cell. lewis was trying to imply yesterday this never happened, but there was a report & charges associated w/ this incident.
Dr Quinton Deeley is being sworn & his credentials verified. He stands by the contents of a report he submitted to court. He conducted a 2-hour autism test on #Assange + a 6 hour interview.
#Assange told Dr Deeley about what he feared if sent to the US, citing what happened to Joshua Schulte (arrested for Vault 7 leak). You noted 3Assange's symptoms, loss of appetite, sleeplessness, anxiety, disturbing memories, experiences & bodily sensations.
Edward Fitzgerald for the defence: We see "No suicidal intent". What does that indicate?
QD: That can be a default report if the inmate does not volunteer the information that they are about to suicide.
In my opinion Mr Assange satisfies the criteria for Aspberger's syndrome.
EF: Assange's symptoms, according to your observations, those of his mother @MrsC_Assange & his friend @SueletteD, are indicative of him being on the autistic spectrum
Dr Deely has also diagnosed Mr #Assange as suffering from severe depression, ongoing anxiety on top of his Asperger's.
He says the likelihood of suicide if extradited is high. #Assange has told him this would be an unbearable ordeal
EF: Would he be able to manage conditions?
No
EF: What do you think of the Prevention of Suicide service?
QD: Cites Kuper report. People still suicide in the UK & US especially in solitary confinement. Half of suicides are people in solitary.
#Assange reluctant to speak of his condition to Belmarsh staff, fearing isolation.
QD: Mr #Assange's condition fluctuates between moderate & severe depressions. Events either ameliorate or exacerbate his conditions. Access to family helps. Whatever increases his hopefulness helps.
EF: But if extradited, you believe there is a high risk of suicide?
QD: I do.
James Lewis X-exam
Inquiring about Deeley's training & qualifications.has dealt with a lot of prison inmates.
JL: How often do you go to prison?
QD: 4-5 times a year, once in last year, in January, to visit #Assange.
JL: You found #Assange moderately depressed in July?
QD: You know other doctors who see him?
JL is enquiring if @Assange's condition dates from early childhood.
QD Circumstances can trigger symptoms. Assumption is they were always there.
QD speaking about various tests that diagnose autism.
JL JA didn't want to answer 2 questions in a test?
QD Yes, he found it demeaning to be asked to carry out brushing his teeth & talk about his daily routine in self care.
JL: There must be 6 symptoms present?
QD: Not always
JL Let's look at your diagnosis. You outline a number of criteria. Only 2 symptoms are marked, others are mild.
QD Isn't it possible that Mr #Assange's situation could have been responsible for his manner.
JL No. The diagnosis is not based on one single interview.
Lewis asks for a video to be played of #Assange participating in a Q&A at the Frontline Club. We are looking at an instruction manual on how to plug a USB drive into a computer...
Moving on, Lewis asks QD if he has seen #Assange's TV series 'The World Tomorrow'.
QD No
Lewis suggests that #Assange's behaviour in interviews is highly incompatible w/ QD's diagnosis.
QD says that when there is a rehearsed routine & conversation about the subject's area of expertise, they usually open up.
Watching Assange in Q&A at Frontline Club
#Assange saying that no one has come to harm in Afghanistan from release of War Logs & that the Pentagon is refusing to help redact the material. He says we are trying to bring events into the public record & get some justice for civilian deaths.
Strange prosecution playing this
#Assange talking about responsibility towards informants.
QD says #Assange's behaviour in interview is a good example of what he was talking about, when high-functioning subject is talking about their area of expertise.
JL: Are you trying to help this court or advocate a cause?
Defence objects to Lewis's question being inappropriate.
It's clear his perception of Assange's behaviour wildly different to the psychiatrist's. Baraitser allows it.
QD My duty is to the court.
Lewis goes through QD's daily reports about #Assange's behaviour. Says he seems OK
QD is trying to explain to Lewis the specifics of his testing and mental health clusters of symptoms.
Lewis challenging @SueletteD's opinion. Is she a medical expert?
QD That is not required.
I have gathered sufficient qualitative evidence over many years to make my diagnosis.
JL Reads family's description of Julian as witty & great father. Is that compatible w/ your diagnosis?
QD People w/ #Assange's condition can be dutiful.
JL How can someone like that host a chat show?
QD I repeat that they can have a lot to say about their area of expertise.
JL You are not making much eye contact w/ me. Is that a trait? QD I am attending to other people in court.
Talking about another trait, reported by Dr Woodhouse. Lewis reading.
JL On one observation by Ms Woodhouse, you have said this trait is satisfied?
QD I took information from @SueletteD
Lewis continues to challenge Deeley's assessment.
QD asked about risk of suicide.
JL Given his situation would the risk not be the same for any person of his age?
QD No, his condition greatly heightens the risk.
End of X-exam
Court breaks for lunch. Defence lawyer Edward Fitzgerald will take instruction from his client. Dr Quintin Deeley is back in the afternoon for re-examination.
It appears that Professor Paul Mullen will not be able to attend so the defence are trying to contact another witness.
Re-Exam of QD
EF: You conducted a long interview to make one assessment
QD: Yes, 6 hours. In brief the diagnosis was based on the ADOS system, collateral reports and my own observation.
EF: Assange at Frontline Club was a set piece performance?
QD: Yes, on his area of expertise
Dr Quinton Deeley: Listing unusual behaviour of #Assange, as recounted by @SueletteD and others. Some it quite funny. He didn't like small talk...
EF What about #Assange's noted sense of humour? Someone w/ his condition can have an unusual perspective on thinks which might give rise to laughter at the unexpected.
#Assange's language was described as "Edwardian", unusual. This is typical of his condition.
Dr Deeley confirms the similarities in other doctors' observations of #Assange's behaviour. He cites his own experience in this field. The threshold for diagnosis of Assange's condition is high.
No doubt in my mind about Assange's condition. He is intelligent & has coped w/ it
Baraitser is talking about social distancing in the courtroom. It is not good on her right (among family & close associate observers). She wants some to go to the overflow court.
Baraitser also wants a definitive list of witnesses and times. Wants to finish by end of next week.
Edward Fitzgerald says it's impossible to finish by the end of next week. Getting through all the witnesses by then is already pushing it but there would be no time for closing submissions. Baraitser says they should have thought of that & used the court's time more wisely.
EF to Baraitser: We have been doing our best to re-schedule things [since Covid care]. Lewis is now saying he has a problem with witness availability. Fitzgerald says Dr Sondra Crosby could give evidence early tomorrow morning.
Baraitser agrees but she is not happy w/ the chaos.
"Have a seat Mr Assange", says Judge Baraitser. She finds the social distancing in the court "much better".
Witness Professor Fazel is called for the prosecution. He produced a report on July 30. He is forensic psychiatrist. Visits prisons once a fortnight, speciality suicide.
Fazel has published a lot on suicide in prisons & with psychiatric patients. Has notable credentials. He dissents with Dr Deeley's assessment of "high risk". This means it's elevated above the normal population. Suicide is not common in the population so high risk is about 1%.
Fazel says risk of suicide fluctuates over time, so any assessment must be done at the time in question. One cannot rely on past assessments, since life changes.
Fazel thinks Assange is self-managing his risk, by ringing the Samaritans and would be likely to resist suicide.
Fazel I'm not much aware of US prisons but it is my understanding there are assessments & treatments (medications).
Defence cross-examines Prof Fazel
You didn't see Assange when he was most severely disturbed and you fairly said that both Kopelman and Deeley had registered severe depression in Nov-Dec 2019. So you agree that the depression is episodic, depending on circumstances?
Fazel Yes
EF You say #Assange had fewer suicidal thoughts when he saw his family?
Fazel Yes
So he will survive if he can see his family, ring the Samaritans, be given the right meds, but would you say extradition would increase the risk?
Fazel Yes
EF to Fazel You said solitary confinement exacerbates mental health problems. Do you think 22 hours a day in a cell would increase depression?
Fazel: Yes, although some people don't react badly too solitary.
EF You agreed Assange was more depressed in solitary
Fazel Yes
EF Do you know what Special Administrative Measures are?
Fazel I've heard the term
EF Explains and asks if there is a risk of there is a risk of worsening of Assange's symptoms with total isolation.
EF shows Fazel stats for suicide in US prisons. Rate is high & 50% in isolation.
Fazel does not agree that segregation in itself leads to suicide. Suicides have not increased with lockdown measures. In Assange's case it's long terms. There is an increased risk. He would bleak prospects. There would be a hopelessness. That is a trigger. Maybe there are meds.
EF You are aware that high security prisoners on Special Administrative Measures have no access to therapy?
Fazel I don't know about US prisons. I don't want to comment
EF But if that were the case there would be increased risk
Fazel Yes
EF We need to ask US experts?
Fazel Yes
EF We should ask US experts, a warden for example who described SAMS in US prisons as "not fit for human habitation"? Have you heard that?
F: No, I had not heard that.
EF If Assange was severely depressed & in isolation his mental condition would further increase risk?
F: Yes
EF asks Fazel about Assange's symptoms. Lists quite a few. Says he's not an expert but Dr Deeley is.
EF Isolation increases suicidal ideation by 9 times. You are aware of the cases of Lauri Love & Garry McKinnon. They were not extradited for this reason & their conditions.
Fazel confirms nothing about Federal prisons, ADX prison in Virginia, about @xychelea's attempted suicide?
On re-exam, Fazel thinks if Assange were given a shorter sentence, there would be less risk. He agrees different inmates react differently. Re SAMS, Lewis reads Kromberg...
Lewis: Assange will be placed in a holding cell where it is decided where he is placed in Alexandria ADC. There is no solitary in ADC. Prisoners are locked in their cells a max of 22 hours/day. They can talk to others through the bars. They can speak w/ lawyers. Is that so risky?
Lewis (reading Kromberg) They have televisions, can play bingo & ball, learn a variety of things etc
EF: My learned friend has not mentioned H Block where Assange is likely to go
Fazel: It depends a lot on the quality of service & possibility of social interaction.
Lewis: On the spectrum, where is Assange?
Fazel: On the mild end
Edward Fitzgerald reads from Dr Katherine Humphrey's report. Assange was performing well below his optimal cognitive level.
Some witnesses have been culled. Tomorrow's witnesses will be Dr Sondra Crosby and Dr Blackwood.
Edward Fitzgerald has asked for 1 month before final submissions, to respond to the very recent 2nd superseding indictment. Baraitser offers no extra time. Wants them in the fifth week. Fitzgerald says this would do no justice to #Assange's case. Lewis wants written submissions
Correction: Dr Deeley said #Assange understands systems (our typo)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are in the Supreme Court in Canberra, Australia, waiting for David McBride @MurdochCadell's appeal to begin. Our live updates will be on this thread.
McBride's appeal will be in front of a full bench of three female judges: Justice Baker, Justice Taylor and Justice Abraham. Senior counsel for McBride is Bill Neild. Junior counsel Kieran Ginges. His solicitor is Edwina Lloyd @worldzonfire.
@worldzonfire We have been informed that proceedings will be late in starting because @MurdochCadell was still at the prison. No reason was given why he was not already in court.
Day Two of the closing arguments for Antoinette Lattouf v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation will begin at 9.45am AEDT / 5.45pm EST today. We will be providing live updates on this thread.
Proceedings may be viewed on this link for the duration of today's session.
We heard from Lattouf's lawyers yesterday. Today will be the closing arguments for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Justice Darryl Rangiah presides, and Ian Neil SC (IN) will speak for the ABC.
Court in session. Lattouf lawyer Oshie Fagir (OF) tenders 3 documents. Number one is a medical opinion concerning the definition of disability, saying there is no difference between the underlying condition and its manifestation. Other documents concern the testimony of the decision-makers and their reasons for the actions they took.
Day One of the closing arguments for Antoinette Lattouf v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation will begin at 10.15am AEDT / 6.15pm EST today. We will be providing live updates on this thread.
Proceedings may be viewed on this link for the duration of today's session.
Our reporting on days one to seven of witness testimonies of Lattouf v. ABC are on these threads.
Last day of witness testimony for Lattouf v. ABC will begin in about 30 minutes. Live updates will be on this thread and the proceedings will be live-streamed from the Federal Court of Australia on this link:
Yesterday ended with the former ABC Chair Ita Buttrose claiming she had nothing to do with @antoinette_news' sacking, despite evidence of a number of emails she sent to subordinates that appeared to apply pressure for this outcome.
She stated in court: "I'm not happy and I wasn't happy. I didn't wish her to be removed. I didn't put pressure on anybody. It's a fantasy of your own imagination. I have nothing to do with her dismissal".
Court in session.
Judge: A media organisation has published information that was subject to a suppression order. I ask that this organisation consider their position & avoid further action.
Announcement of document that has arrived.
Next witness with be Elizabeth Green (direct manager of Lattouf). There is an objection to a part of her affidavit, starting with "this is because...". Judge reads & Lattouf lawyer objects on relevance. What is revenant is what she said or intended to say in a meeting.
Judge: Isn't that favourable for you
LL: Potentially but what is relevant is what preceded her characterisation of what she said.
Judge: I will provisionally let that evidence be led & we can deal with the matter in closing submissions.
Green takes the stand. Confirms her name & position as producer of Sydney 'Drive' show.
LL refers Green to her affidavit.
EG: It's details of a Teams meeting + screenshot I took.
Barrister Philip Boncardo for Lattouf: Did you see complaints about AL?
EG: Yes
PB: Were you told they were from lobby groups?
EG: No, not that I recall.
PB: Re conversations with Ahern. he asked you to look at AL's post. Did you know they about Israel-Palestine?
EG: Yes
PB asks about specifics of what EG said to Lattouf about social media posting & about communication to Ms McBean, legal council.
EG: I said she should be mindful, avoid posting anything about Israel-Palestine.
PB: AL had asked if she had done anything wrong
EG: I told her she was doing a good job, but keep a low profile on social media.
PB: Did you tell Lattouf she should not post anything that might appear unbalanced or not impartial.
EG: Yes
PB: Nothing about Israel-Palestine?
EG: yes I believe so
PB: You said it was OK to post anything factual and from a verified organisation?
EG: Yes
PB: Nothing controversial?
EG: Yes
PB: You got an email from AL outlining what was OK to post & you forwarded this to Ahern. And you both OKd this?
EG: Yes
PB: You gave Lattouf good feedback on her show?
EG: Yes
PB: You were copied in on an email sent by Ahern detailing why AL was on the show.
EG: Yes
PB: When you learned of an intention to dismiss AL you raised an objection that there was nothing wrong with her post?
EG: yes
PB: You were at the dismissal meeting with Ahern & Lattouf where it was explained she had breached the social media policy. Did AL say she had discussed what was OK with you?
EG: Yes
PB: Al was crying & you spent time with here. You said you were sorry & had tried to stop this, but it was coming from higher up?
EG: yes
PB: AL asked if it was about the @hrw post & you said it was about it not being balanced.
EG: Yes
PB: And she said: "How can you balance starvation (as a 'weapon of war')?
EG: I don't recall that.
PB: You said you would love AL to work at the ABC again.
EG: Yes
PB: You made notes, saying you had heard the decision came from Mr Anderson. Heard from whom?
Lattouf v. ABC will resume in the Federal Court of Australia in about 20 minutes time & we'll hear from five witnesses over the two days. Updates are on this thread & the proceedings can be viewed on this link.
@antoinette_news Day Six of Lattouf v. ABC in session. Judge makes announcement about violations of the confidentiality of complainants' names & addresses - and the uploading of unredacted material to the publicly available online files. ABC lawyer apologises for the human error.
@antoinette_news Today we will hear from Ahern, Buttrose & Green. Statement from ABC: does not deny the existence of the Lebanese race or ethnic extraction & that Ms Lattouf is Lebanese. Does deny this has anything to do with her dismissal.
Our DAY FIVE reporting on the Lattouf v. ABC case will be on this thread and starting at 9.30am AEDT, the proceedings can be viewed via this link ⬇️
We arrived at a point yesterday where David Anderson, the Managing Director of the ABC (Australia's national broadcaster) testified that @antoinette_news' mention of "Illegally occupied territories" of #Gaza could be interpreted as anti-semitic hate speech.
The Australian journalists' union @withMEAA has since issued a statement about outside interference that may have influenced such views within the ABC.
Court in session. Calling Christopher Nicolas Oliver-Taylor (O-T), Chief Content Officer (COT) for ABC.
Changes since affidavit - resigned from ABC.
Screenshot shown from Teams meeting
Oshie Fagir: You took a religious oath
O-T: Yes, I'm Catholic
OF: Do you know what a managed exit is?
O-T: No
OF: Do you use Signal & did you communicate about Ms Lattouf over Signal
O-T: Yes & yes, with Mr Latimer
OF reads O-T's job description - ensures compliance for editorial policies (EdPols) - - formerly over 1K people
OF - Do you understand EdPols govern on air content, and then there are Guidelines for personal use of social media & ABC distinguishes the two?
O-T Yes, but it depends on the circumstances?
OF- So personal social media activity is not ABC content & not subject to EdPols. Agree?
O-T Yes, but impartiality can come into play
OF: You were also bound by EdPols?
O-T: Yes
OF draws O-T's attention to the subject of misconduct = where employee disobeys a reasonable and lawful direction.
OF You understand the difference between direction, request and suggestion?
O-T: Yes
OF: The way Ms Lattouf (AL) was dealt with was highly abnormal. Agree?
O-T: No
OF: Ms Green was AL's line manager. Wasn't it unusual for you & ABC's MD to be involved in scrutinising the conduct of a 5-day casual employee? You disagreed.
O-T: Nods
OF: Social media misconduct should have nothing to do with EdPols or the COT, but be managed by line manager.
O-T: Not unless the MD refers it to COT. It was managed by line manager but others involved to.
OF: When did you consult with people in Culture?
O-T: I did not
OF: You understood that Lattouf was not a high profile personality?
O-T: Yes
OF: You were aware of her race & national extraction?
O-T: No
OF: You see this email you wrote, where you say she is a Lebanese Christian?
O-T: I copy/pasted this content from Mr Ahern...
OF: Of course you knew. Were you confused by this? You understand that there is a race called Lebanese Christian?
ABC lawyer: Objection
Judge asks O-T to leave the room
OF reminds judge that Fair Work Act permits use of race as a national or ethnic category
OF to O-T: You understand Lattouf was Lebanese?
O-T: I wasn't really aware of all the content of my email send to MD Anderson.
OF: You just copy/paste content to email and send?
O-T: In some cases. The criteria. for Lattouf's selection were put together by someone else.
OF: You understood Lattouf's position on the Israel-Gaza war before she was hired?
O-T: More as the week continued. I don't know if I understood her position but I knew there were published comments relating to question of partiality as a host of a live radio show.
OF: You understood when you caused her to be removed from the air that Lattouf held a view that media orgs should report ethically on Israel-Palestine?
O-T: I didn't know she held that view
OF refers to O-T sent to Ahern & Latimer, questioning her suitability for the job because of her position on Israel-Palestine & because she signed a petition.
OF: You knew her political stance when you fired her, that she was critical of the State of Israel?
O-T: No
OF: You knew she had signed a petition calling for ethical reporting on the war?
O-T: It wasn't about that, She wasn't supposed to post anything during her period of employment
OF: He dismissal was precipitated by a social media post? When did you become aware of that?
O-T: Yes. during a Teams meeting,. It was a slide shared by Mr Latimer
OF: You gave evidence at the Fair Work Commission that you had never seen that post. O-T says his memory is not clear.
OF moves on to the week of Lattouf's dismissal. O-T says he was looking at ways she could be kept on air.
OF refers to correspondence about Lattouf. There is no indication here that you saw her posts relating to diversity of voices and Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war. Correct?
O-T: I can't recall. I believe I was told by Mr Latimer
OF reads from O-T affidavit, questions the use of language defining partiality. Asks if those are lawyer's words or his.
O-T: I don't know how to answer that
OF : You understand there is an obligation for ABC employees to be impartial. On what issues?
O-T: That's a broad question but if you're a live radio host you should be impartial, there are some topics where it becomes difficult to hold personal view.
OF: The obligation applies at all times or only at work
O-T: It depends on the circumstances
OF: And if you are radio host, it applies to all subject matter? Did you understand that when Lattouf was employed by ABC she should be impartial on all subject matter at all times?
O-T: No? (O-T speaking very quietly)
OF: Lattouf was hosting the 'Mornings' show and it was a (politically) light show. That her work was not related to the Israel-Gaza war?
O-T: Yes, but there were news breaks & that was the hottest news story at the time.
OF: You wrote "her work is not related to the Israel-Gaza war. You knew the content of 'Mornings' was significantly watered down coming up to Christmas.
OF: You knew Lattouf did not present the news. That was a completely different person & different department. Correct?
O-T: Yes
OF: Was Lattouf sacked for breaching a direction?
O-T: Yes, and was not impartial - and this could have affected perception of her impartiality on air.
OF: Who gave the direction not to pst on social media
O-T: I believe it was Mr Ahern
OF: Because she was known to have certain opinions about the Israel-Gaza War?
O-T: I was told that
OF: What was her view?
O-T: I'm not sure
OF: You took a decision without knowing anything about her views?
O-T: I'm not an expert on the issues. I was told there was a problem related to impartiality.
OF: You knew complaints were made by a pro-Israel lobby?
O-T: I knew there had been a number of complaints. I don't believe I knew it was a lobby. It was by people who held a different view to Ms Lattouf. That was clear.
OF: You understood that the complaints were about her position on the Israel-Gaza war.
O-T: Yes
OF: You have been instructed not to acknowledge Ms Lattouf's position & just use the catch-phrase "impartiality", right?
O-T: I don't agree with that statement.
OF On Dec 18, did you know who Lattouf was?
O-T: I don't think so
OF: Did Anderson know her?
O-T: I don't know sir
OF: You knew complaints were about her position on the war?
O-T: Yes, Mr Anderson told me
OF: And you told Mr Ahern to seek advice Latimer & Saska?
O-T: Yes they were the experts on subject matter
OF: On what basis has the ABC authority to forbid Lattouf from expressing her views?
O-T: Our concern about impartiality
OF You note Latimer's advice that the ABC could not expect a casual presenter's view to be consistent with ABC policy at all times? You agree with that?
O-T: Yes
OF: And you note Melkman's comments about her Crikey article, that it was clearly journalistic work?
OF: Yes
O-T: You agreed with Melkman's view (as acting editorial director)?
O-T: Yes
OF You then get an email from Ahern & see mention of Lattouf's views on the Israel-Gaza war. Did you read it?
O-T: Briefly
OF: You had a lot of emails about this. Was it a priority issue?
O-T: Yes but it wasn't about something I knew much about.
OF: Your affidavit speaks of what was in your mind the week of the dismissal.
O-T: There were lots of things going on. I was running 9 radio stations & 4 RV channels
OF: But there's a lot about this matter in you affidavit.
O-T: I remember different things at different times.
OF: You have no reason to doubt what was in Ahern's email? Your view when you wrote to the MD was that Lattouf had expressed views that would be problematic?
O-T: During her period of employment
OF You understood there would be no coverage of Israel-Gaza that week?
O-T: Yes
OF: Did you think AL's signing a petition was relevant?
O-T: No but others were concerned
OF: You recall a series of texts the MD sent you that evening of Dec 18?
O-T: Yes
OF, referring to the one saying MD thought "we have an Antoinette problem. Her socials are full of anti-semitic hatred" and doubting ABC could have someone like that on air. Did you think he was right?
O-T: I did know much about the issue. I was concerned that she was on live radio.
OF: You had no idea what she was posting?
O-T: I agreed with Anderson that we had a problem because she was live.
OF: You were sent a screenshot about Crikey reporting by Lattouf & Cameron Wilson. What's problematic about her contributing to a Crikey article?
O-T: My concern was that she was live.
OF: ABC journalists publish articles every day where they express their opinions. Should this disqualify them from working at the ABC.
O-T: I'm not a journalist. When an MD uses words like "ant-semitic hatred" I become concerned.
OF: Didn't you say you didn't know anything about Lattouf's views, but were aware on the evening of Dec 18 that she was critical of the State of Israel?
O-T: MD told me that and supplied a screenshot.
Judge asks O-T to leave court. Discussion about line of questioning. OF says O-T was a decision-maker. The allegation was that Lattouf was sacked because of her political views. He wants to educe evidence that O-T was ate of those views. Judge suggests he take question in two steps. O-T returns.