I’ve heard some on the left worry @JoeBiden won’t be progressive enough, won’t fight back against #GOP perfidy, etc., because he’s always been a moderate. Hey. Who a President was, politically, before he becomes President, and what he “stood for”, is historically irrelevant.
Lincoln wasn’t in favor of abolition when he ran for President; he ran as a “moderate” against slavery’s expansion, not its elimination. He fought against emancipation for months until he finally came around. His opponents in the South forced him to change.
FDR ran as a fiscal, social *conservative* in 1932, promising a balanced budget and no deficits. His political party had other ideas— most New Deal legislation was a result of FDR watering down those ideas, not pushing them forward. He took bold action because he *had* to.
Liberal icon JFK was a social and fiscal conservative. Period. His big economic idea going into the 1963 election cycle was a top rate TAX CUT. If he’d lived it’s doubtful he would have pushed or successfully enacted *any* of the civil rights and social legislation LBJ did.
Nixon was the most liberal and progressive President of the last fifty years. Period. No President since has enacted as much social and economic justice and ecological justice legislation as Nixon. None.
George H.W. Bush was a moderate liberal in conservative clothing.
Clinton was a moderate conservative in liberal clothing.
George W. Bush intended to be a moderate conservative in conservative clothing but 9/11 happened and, well, f**k. If Al Gore had been elected he would have been a moderate conservative in liberal clothing till 9/11 happened, and, well, f**k.
Presidents don’t lead, they reflect. The best Presidents rise to the occasion history presents them with— they don’t create history, they channel it. Good Presidents read the national mood and manage to provide what the people need, not what they want.
You simply cannot predict how a President will behave in office. Even Trump has defied prediction— mostly by being less cunning and savvy than even our worst imaginings. He’s a failure because he’s an outlier, not because of his actions or policy or behavior.
If/when he comes into office in 2021, President Joe Biden will be the President the country needs precisely *because* he doesn’t have a passionate progressive policy position— which will allow him to channel history the way Lincoln, FDR, and even Nixon (none ideological) did.
Biden is a good man with good instincts— one of which is a highly tuned sense of empathy that makes him the perfect man to channel history and the national mood. He may not initiate progressive policy but he will enable and empower it, as FDR did throughout the 1930s.
So, to my fellow progressives: Relax.
To quote another old man from Biden’s generation,
“You can't always get what you want
But if you try sometime you find
You get what you need”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sunday political 🧵: Federalism is the hope and the scourge of progressivism in America. The U.S. has a federal system of political power division; conservatives understand this on a practical political leverage level, progressives don’t.
Up until recently, every school kid learned about the federal system (I don’t know if they still do; schooling has changed a lot since I went), but mostly in our daily lives we ignore it and think we live in a unified nation governed by a single set of laws. We actually don’t.
We I say “federal” you probably think “the Government” and you think of Washington as the seat of government. But that isn’t what federal means at all. Its basis is “federation”— and if you’re a Star Trek fan, maybe the penny is dropping.
A question I’m often asked at conventions is “How do you break into comics?” I have no idea— the last time I tried it was 1967. But a better question might be: “How do you write a ‘good’ comic?” For that, I have a few ideas.
First, foremost: Read. Read a lot. Don’t just read comics, read books. Lots and lots of books. Always have a book with you and read at every opportunity. Read at lunch, be that weirdo. Read on the bus. On planes. On trains. Don’t read while driving.
Second, vital: Keep reading. Read fiction, read non-fiction, read history, science, economics, more fiction, “literature,” mysteries, science fiction, westerns. Stuff yourself with words. Ideas. Odd facts and bits of legend. Poetry, Shakespeare, e.e. cummings, doggerel.
People often asked me this past year*— “Gerry, how do you maintain a mostly cheerful attitude in your daily life, despite daily news accounts of misery, death, and human stupidity?”
“Well,” I tell them, “I practice the patented DDD Sanity Preservation Self-Protection System™!”
*nobody asks me.
What is this patented system of DDD Sanity Preservation™, you may ask? I shall be happy to explain. Thusly.
I have very loud neighbors. Just putting that here.
It’s like living next to a sports bar.
To put this in perspective, this is a quiet suburban neighborhood. The folks who own the house and live in it are 30-40-something with kids. Like the Dunphys in Modern Family. They’re now singing drunkenly, loudly, out of tune.
Spoiler free reaction to Zack Snyder's JL: I wish the man who made this movie had made "Man of Steel" and "BvS". Maybe Snyder took to heart some of the criticism of those two movies, because tonally this is a different piece-- a paean to the power of hope and healing.
I also understand why Ray Fisher was so upset by the "restructuring" of the film (aside from his reports of abusive behavior): The major human emotional arc of this film belongs to Victor Stone, and its loss in the theatrical JL cuts the heart out of the story.
I don't know whether it was because of WB's demand for a much shorter film, and the necessity that created for reshoots to elipsize chunks of plot, which in turn rushed the CGI work, but, boy, does this "rebuilt" cut kick ass visually.
Comic book thread. Talking with @johnwordballoon on YouTube live yesterday, we had a “what I would do if I ran the world” conversation about the future of comic book publishing that I think is worthy of expansion. So here we go.
Background: To state the obvious, comic book publishing is in serious trouble, with a business model that almost literally has no future. Yet comic books are a source of intellectual property for exploitation in all sorts of popular media and have never have greater potential.
So, why is this? Why do comics as a storytelling form (superhero and otherwise) have such an enormous impact on popular culture but comic book publishers are struggling to survive? Why are publishers almost universally failing to succeed at actual publishing?