I am reflecting on Newson's "Surface sociability, but lack of sense of identity, pride, or shame" trait. There are aspects of it which are problematic, infact I would argue are an RRBI, or should be removed from it.
Her logic also seems faulty.
My concerns centre around the inclusion of behaviours that seem to indicate distress. Which means if a person is displaying these behaviours due to distress, they would be highly aroused.
If so anyone (autistic or not), will not be concerned about pride/ social identity/ shame.
Newson also links these behaviours with demand avoidance, lacking sense from that. Yet the demand avoidance is meant to be obsessive.
So Newson is conflating features that are RRBI in nature with social communication issues.
Lets put this way, so demand avoidance in PDA is obsessive because person lacks pride/ shame/ social identity?
But demand avoidance is meant to be obsessive due to a need for control (to not conform to demands).
Some aspects, one could call social sociability. Others just seem to should go elsewhere, maybe lability of mood?
"All give an impression of sociability, but 84% show very inappropriate behaviour and social response OVER AND ABOVE their demand avoidance." adc.bmj.com/content/archdi…
"86% show no sense of pride, shame, responsibility, or identity in themselves, IN ADDITION to the lack of this sense which is implied by their demand avoidance."
I am just struggling to see the logic here. Especially if you are including distress behaviours linked to panic
"Sixty eight per cent show aggression to others, with no sex difference; 60% have extreme outbursts or panic attacks. Eighty"
It just seems that it seems in some respects Newson is pathologising the person twice. Once for lacking sense due to need for control and then for lacking pride/ shame/ social identity.
I am just unsure that these features in this trait are due to lacking "sense of social identity, pride, or shame".
I do not think it is due to ToM deficits or emapthy. I think there are other cognitive aspects that underpin these features.
I need to reflect on this more.
Something about this trait just feels wrong and I cannot put my finger on it.
@Andylowarousal@paullib1972@milton_damian@gdmorewood does this making sense to you. i.e. if a person is having panic attacks etc, they will be highly aroused. Thus, "pride/ shame/ sense of social identity" will not cross the person's mind?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This meme was first published by Sally Cat on facebook. It is not a "joke". Its bullying by its creator.
If I edited this meme to have Sally Cat's face on it, & saying "It is all makes sene of why she was such an incompetent, arrogant, under-qualified twat"; that edited meme would be viewed as bullying.
Sally Cat's views on me, since they created this meme, also show that this meme is an accurate reflection of their views on me; i.e., the meme is not meant to be taken as a "joke".
I would ask anyone who claims the meme is a "joke", how is claiming anyone is "incompetent, arrogant, under-qualified twat", is being nice towards the target of the "joke"? Would you be happy if someone called you "incompetent, arrogant, under-qualified twat"?
Title.
What are the predicted risks of the proposed autism subtypes of “Profound Autism” & “Pathological” Demand-Avoidance (PDA)?
Abstract.
Leo Kanner suggested autism as a subtype of Childhood Schizophrenia, as part of the historical broader attempts to categorise people expressing social communication via subtypes over the last nine decades. ..
...Other attempts to successfully divide Autistic persons into subtypes have consistently failed to produce stable subtypes which can be reliably identified, and which have been challenged for creating avoidable prejudice and stigma...
There is much to admire about someone's dedication to "PDA Profile of ASD".
Still, @milton_damian have you, or I ever intended Rational Demand Avoidance to say one's demand-avoidance is entirely rational reasons, or only "good reasons"?
The assumption that rational demand avoidance, means a person can only experience demands due to "good reasons"/ rational reasons to be used to justify the pretense of the claimed split between RDA & PDA.
There does not seem to much consideration that reasons why someone might express "rational" demand avoidance, or for "good reasons", might be irrational, or "random" reasons.
“There is a lot of idiosyncratic interpretation of autism, depending on how much each service adheres to the NHS’s diagnostic criteria and what each psychiatrist’s own interpretation of what autism is.” Prof Marios Adamou.
Would be interested in how "PDA Profile of ASD" is represented in those figures. Theoretically, if "PDA Profile of ASD" advocates are correct PDA is needed to expand definition of autism, PDA diagnoses should be over represented in areas higher positive dx rates!
Title.
Why is it premature to split “Rational” Demand-Avoidance from “Pathological” Demand-Avoidance?
Abstract.
Since 1983 “Pathological” Demand-Avoidance (PDA) has been a contentious term for a proposed psychiatric disorder partly representing intense responses to demands, rapid mood changes, and sometimes other characteristics....