Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "FOR YEARS RUTH BADER GINSBURG SPOKE OF HOW MUCH SHE DEPLORED THE WAY POLITICS WAS BECOMING SOMETHING SO DEPENDENT ON LOTS OF MONEY
Bernie Sanders yelled a lot about Billionaires buying elections.
1)
Even Joe Biden, when a Senator, made speeches against the rich buying elections and distorting the system.
2)
BUT TODAY, MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, TOM STEYER, THE KOCH BROTHERS, THE PEOPLE AT GOOGLE (When not working with the Chinese), Bezos and other Billionaires, are trying to buy the election for Joe Biden, and that's OK with Joe and Kamala.
3)
Consider something: There are campaign finance laws in effect. Why are these not being applied to these Billionaires who are giving hundreds of millions to candidates both directly and indirectly...
4)
(so as to avoid the rules), and when it comes down to it, the campaign finance laws are being materially thwarted?
5)
Bloomberg just said he would use $100 million just in Florida for Biden. Where is that Election Commission limit? Is it suspended for Bloomberg? Here's an idea: These Billionaires should be penalized for an amount at least equal to, their contributions as a penalty...
6)
for evasiveness, the fines to be paid into a fund to fix the destruction done by their Antifa and Black Lives Matter stooges.
7)
So Bloomberg wants to spend $100 million in Florida. Then how about a penalty for that or twice that, for daring to try to buy an election, which is a 3rd degree Felony in Florida with legislated financial and prison penalties."
8)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "REGARDING THE NEWS OF PRO-TERRORIST AND ANTISEMITIC ACTIVITY ON US UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES, WHAT DISTURBS ME MOST ARE THE REACTIONS OF THE JEWISH STUDENTS AND OF OTHER STUDENTS THAT ARE NEITHER JEWISH NOR PRO-TERRORIST.
1)
First of all, where are the responses of the General Student body at Harvard or Yale or Columbia. They are silent. Not a word from Student Governments. Not a word from other student organizations.
2)
Are they condoning the pro-terrorists or is it they just don’t want to look and don’t want to think about how this may affect how the reputation of their school and of their own degrees may suffer.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "THERE HAS BEEN A NUMBER OF ARTICLES ABOUT THE ISSUE THAT THOSE THAT LEFT EGYPT WITH MOSES, WERE A MINORITY OF THE SLAVES.
1)
There is a bit of confusion on this issue, because the Rabbis claimed that a minority of those who were slaves followed Moshe out of Egypt.
2)
The fact is that there was, what our Sages called, a "mixed multitude", made up not only of the descendants of Ya'acov, but also the descendants of other groups from Hyksos Sea Peoples who settled in Egypt, multiplied and became non-Egyptian slaves as well.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "US Secretary of State BLINKEN IS IN CHINA TO BEG FOR HELP.
Yes, my comment may sound harsh, but it is realistic.
Blinken is there to ask the Chinese State to:
1)
1. Try to help calm things in the Middle East by using its influence on Iran. 2. To try to limit exit visas to Chinese citizens who then head to the USA as illegal migrants 3. To moderate their naval activities in the Western Pacific.
2)
All to help Biden and the Democrats with votes in November.
He will warn them that if Trump gets elected, China may not have the kind of cooperation for the USA that it does under Biden, that Trump might demand an end to China taking advantage of the USA.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "WHAT POLITICAL CANDIDATE DOES NOT TRY TO INFLUENCE HIS (OR HER). ELECTION TO OFFICE?
1)
This probably sounds like a silly question — but in the Trump New York Case, this was the core of the prosecution’s case, that somehow Trump colluded to give him advantage in an election.
2)
In short, they claim he did something criminal - that every politician does, that all the Democrats have done.
So far, by the way, no matter what happens in this case, there are already lots of causes for appeal.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "HOW THE MEDIA LIES TO THE PUBLIC IN THE USA.
Yahoo news yesterday published this:
The headline implied that David Pecker's testimony was damaging to Trump
1)
'Trump trial updates: Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker details efforts to help Trump's 2016 campaign'
What was unsaid is that every TV Network in the USA & the NYT & the Washington Post, in the same way, colluded with the Democrats to slant news against Trump.
2)