"Anarchist endorsements" for president are fun:
the photo lets you identify the height of the person doing the tagging - and the initial hesitation almost certainly means they got it on their fingers.
[ p.s. you don't burn down your own signs 😂]
the photo lets you identify the height of the person doing the tagging - and the initial hesitation almost certainly means they got it on their fingers.
[ p.s. you don't burn down your own signs 😂]
https://twitter.com/WCCO/status/1308838289152110592
TFW when - I'm thinking - either :
a) insurance fraud (but that would be dumb to leave your truck with the gass pointing towards the flames.)
a) insurance fraud (but that would be dumb to leave your truck with the gass pointing towards the flames.)
b) those who support your favorite candidate are cool with targeting your property when you have a sign out front so they can use it to point fingers at the other side...
but if your fave candidate profits from the crime, would profiting 2x mean claims were insurance fraud?
but if your fave candidate profits from the crime, would profiting 2x mean claims were insurance fraud?
( implying, of course, that one may choose to not vigorously pursue a legitimate investigation that would help avoid bad press for the campaign and submit the claim anyway ).
Nothing specifically implied about the residents of this property.
Nothing specifically implied about the residents of this property.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
