(Q1) Are there any new changes apart from the one notified in 1 July, 2020 and effective now?
Not much, but SEBI has given few clarifications where RIA has raised doubts. Good news is there are no further burden. The new guidelines are almost similar to the consultation paper.
(Q2) So, segregation for clients with respect to advisory and distribution remains?
Yes. Client has to choose one at the time of onboarding itself. Existing clients also need to choose one if they were doing both with same RIA.
Existing investments can continue to hold.
(Q3) Can i get advisory in my name and distribution in the name of my wife, papa, mummy(!) from same RIA?
No. Client level segregation is done at PAN level and the family and dependents will be counted as one client.
Family - Self, dependent parents, dependent child, Spouse
(Q4) How will SEBI know that two clients are related to each in family?
Client has to given annual declaration to RIA which need to give same to SEBI.
The definition of dependents is IT Act definition. Where the income gets clubbed they are dependent. Otherwise independent.
(Q5) How will the fees be decided now to RIA?
ONLY two modes:
(a) 2.5% of the AUA per client per annum or
(b) Max 1.25L per client per annum
Indirectly, it means RIA cannot charge performance fees.
Different clients can be charged with any of option (a) or (b)
(Q6) Any changes to the client agreement?
For new clients, agreement need to be done BEFORE transfer of any fees or giving advice. SEBI has given sample T&C to avoid any confusion.
IMHO, this means agreement with digital signature will work but 'tickbox' for T&C will not work.
(Q7) How frequent can RIA charges the fees?
Max 2 qtrs in one go as advance if going with option (a) or (b) as mentioned above
Not applicable to one time services like Portfolio review or making a financial plan.
No fee change before 12months.
(Q8) How will AUA be decided?
As per new norms, RIA need to have demat and unit statements of the client to show AUA.
AUA before 30 Sept, 2020 will not be counted under new norms.
(Q9). Any changes to qualification criterion?
3yr for fulfilling new criterion for existing RIAs
All existing RIAs above age of 50 exempted from enhanced qualification
Anyone applying fresh need to fulfil all criterion at the time of applying
(Q10) What about the limit for 150 clients for individual RIAs?
The limit stays but family of client will be considered as one client only.
After 150, compulsory change to non-individual RIA.
During the application process to NI RA, one cannot onboard clients beyond 150
(Q11) Apart from this, any other requirements.
The audit, record keeping, risk profiling, website details are now clearly laid out.
(Q12) What will be the impact on the business?
(a) Compliant RIAs have better survival chance
(b) Robo-advisors and tip providers will get killed
(c) RIAs will merge to form NRIAs
(d) NRIAs will absorb RIAs
End of thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Markets had an extremely smooth run-time in last 5 months, much ahead of everyone's expectations.
Older and wiser investors are unduly cautious while newer and bold investors with YOLO approach wants more.
Time for some investment lessons learned from past cycles 🧵
(1) Define your investment objectives and goals clearly.
Success in investment depends largely on clarity in investment O&G. Factors like growth, yield, income, risk, are dynamic & will keep on changing every year.
Investors must periodically re-evaluate objectives.
(2) Forming a solid investment team is critical to successful investment strategy.
Carefully assess the honesty, competence, and objective of those giving you investment advice & services.
DIY investors need to make sure they have sufficient time and skill set to execute.
A thread of the 10 best podcast episodes (& series) I listened to this year #2022inreview
PS : I use @Spotify as my platform, so hyperlinks are from there. In the case of the series, I have shared a link to the first episode.
This is across genres. RT for wider benefit.
(1) For over ~4hrs, @amitvarma and @BShrayana discuss the complexities of being a woman in India. Context is the latter's wonderfully written - "Desperately Seeking Shah Rukh" which is a cleverly disguised economics book talking about movies.
(2) Summarizing gist of the business is a forte of @bizbreakdowns and this one chronicling GE's dominance and decline is a treat, specially inputs coming from Josh Aguilar, @MorningstarInc analyst who has tracked the company closely for many yrs.
Certain business channels allowing ONLY SEBI registered analysts & advisors to come on their shows from NOW ON after all this brouhaha is just hogwash.
This should have been done always in the past but that's not how money is made on channels.
Eventually all business channels need to survive which means more hits and clicks across various social media platforms. So called finfluencers provided that on a platter, regulation be damned.
So now following the RA (2016) or RIA (2013) regulations smells of hypocricy.
Every finfluencer has been blantantly disregarding RA/RIA regulations for years in the name of 'only for educational purposes'.
Regulations are clear, if you want to talk about stocks across ANY platform, get a license from SEBI. But this has been rarely practiced.
Quite a lot of investors are worried about the FPIs dumping Indian equities and concluding that this is the prime reason for the ongoing correction in stock prices.
A 🧵 to understand details about FPIs buying and selling in financial markets before jumping to conclusions
(1) FPIs are NOT a uniform class of investors.
Some examples:
Pension funds - very long term horizon (multi-decades)
Hedge funds & AIF - very short term horizon (3-6m)
EM funds - buy/sell as basket including India
ETFs - MSCI, iShare EM, iShare Asia, FTSE
(1a) All these investors differ in Investment:
- Horizon
- Objectives
- Strategies
They rarely act in unison as the universe of investible stocks is also different.
To assume that all FPIs are selling at the same time violating the mandate & exiting India is bit overdramatic.
A good article on the challenges of working as SEBI registered Investment advisor (RIA). The new norms have come from Oct-20 and it has caused more harm than good.
(1) The 2yr PG in "relevant stream" clause is filled with roadblocks (Earlier it was only PG). Forcing RIAs to do a PG degree that too of 2 yrs is bizzare. Many professional certifications like CS were removed from the equivalent PG category overnight.
(2) Foreign PG degrees of 2 yrs require equivalent certificate from Indian authorities which is a pain specially if considerable time has passed for PG. Its like running from pillar to post. Proving "relevant stream" again has been an uphill task.