Happy 124th birthday to Scott Fitzgerald, born #otd in 1896. The best decision of my professional life was to center it around his works and the interwar period he chronicled.
This year also marks the centenary of his literary career, which kicked off with the proverbial bang in 1920 - in honor of which I’ve done an essay for the latest issue of @nybooks ($) nybooks.com/articles/2020/…
I’ve written scores of essays about him and his work, but here’s one that isn’t paywalled, and includes my favorite photograph of him. newstatesman.com/culture/books/…
Also pleased to say that a newly revised edition of the Cambridge Companion to Scott Fitzgerald is in the works, & I've done the Gatsby essay for it, keeping company with the v best Fitzgerald scholars today, incl @KirkCurnutt@venetianblonde@eetempleton@pipmcgowan
Between now and the Gatsby centenary in 2025 we are all going to be veeery busy #Fitzing, and there will be lots of great stuff emerging. So happy #Fitzday!
Postscript on the 2015 Fitzgerald Conference (to which @ScottFilmCritic gave the immortal name “Fitzstock”) and featuring a fabulous illustration that I covet. ft.com/content/759c45…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This guy is in charge of Project 2025, aka Trump's Presidential Transition Project. He has just said their second revolution will be "bloodless if the left allows it to be."
This means they will bring serious violence if we resist them. Pay attention.
Today I published a new essay on a topic - the history of what was once known as "race suicide" - I've been researching for a while, and I thought some people might be interested in some of the back story and research context. 1🧵
The editors have headlined this essay a "secret history" of abortion debates in America. It's not really secret, but it's also certainly not part of the popular understanding of abortion in the US a century ago. 2 theguardian.com/books/2022/jul…
There have been passing references to "race suicide" in several responses I've seen to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, describing it (accurately) as an early iteration of Great Replacement Theory. Most of them attribute the phrase to a eugenicist sociologist, Edward A. Ross. 3
Actual announcement on actual British train: "Our card reader is not working so we can't take payments. Please do not come to the buffet car, there is no buffet service. If you're in standard, there will be an at-seat trolley service, but it won't be able to sell you anything."
Such a perfect metaphor for British life today.
I'm in First (weekend upgrade, don't @ me), where trolley service is 'complimentary.' Attendant just offered me a breakfast box, I asked what was in it. She snapped, 'I don't know, they change it every week you'll just have to take it and find out.'
🎉🎊 Today is publication day for my new book The Wrath to Come: Gone with the Wind and the Lies America Tells. 🥳
Publication day is always dramatic for any author. It represents the culmination of many months, and often, especially with heavily researched books, years of hard work. The Wrath to Come has taken me 3 years to write.
But the publication of The Wrath to Come has been more than usually dramatic, to say the least. 😳
Yesterday, my friend Prof Suzannah Lipscomb, whom many of you know as @sixteenthCgirl, was featured in a Sunday Times article, calling for a women's prize for nonfiction writing, akin to the @WomensPrize for fiction.
In the interview she calls out the "authority gap," as described by @MASieghart - that women are statistically and demonstrably less likely to be taken seriously when they speak and write than men.
In the piece, she is described as "Suzannah Lipscomb, the academic and author," and quoted saying, "People think women lack authority." The @ST_Newsroom then adds that Lipscomb is a professor emerita. Nowhere in the piece does it grant her the title "Professor."
So @BBCNews has decided that the expert witness they need on the Maxwell trial is Alan Dershowitz. Who has taken the opportunity to say that it shows how accusations against him and Prince Andrew are wrong.
I’d really like to understand how @BBCNews treats as an expert witness someone who literally admits without being asked that he is among the people implicated in the case. “The question is when will Giuffre be charged rather than her charging people like Prince Andrew and me.” 🤯
I am not a lawyer, so I can’t comment on the legality. But journalistically, he should not have been presented as an impartial expert witness only to say the verdict vindicates him, personally.