- Number of tests in pillar 1 ⬆️by 21%, pillar 2 ⬇️by 7%
- Number of cases in pillar 1 ⬆️123% from 1,589 to 3,550
- Number cases in pillar 2 ⬇️8% from 17,181 to 15,728
Means positivity for pillar 2 remains 4.1%
And pillar 1 ⬆️to 1.8% from 1.0%
Ongoing ⬆️pillar 1 cases may be due to more cases in care homes and hospitals (some PHE data supports this).
May also be due to prioritising tests among symptomatic.
And @PHE_UK data to 13th Sept show this cases still largely driven by younger adults, but rises in positivity rates across all age gps (next PHE surveillance report is tomorrow)
A massive 21,268 people transferred to Test & Trace. About 2,000 more than the number of weekly cases meaning the system may have largely caught up on any backlog.
A disappointing 78% of cases reached down from 83% the past week.
Highest yet (84%) provided details of at least one contact. Again, suggesting good engagement once contacted.
*Again* would like to know contribution of local authority contact tracing systems – how has their introduction improved overall T&T performance for contacting cases and identifying contacts?
Number of contacts identified has increased, but contacts per case largely the same.
It’s 4.7 contacts per non-complex case (5.2 last week), and 30.7 contacts per complex case (34.2 last week).
These difference from last week may just be natural variations but equally, might reflect a change in social behaviours/local lockdowns. Need to analyse local level data to pick that apart.
Percentage of non-complex contacts reached remains 64%.
This means only 50%-60% of possible contacts are reached (78% cases reached, 84% give details of contacts, and 75% of contacts reached)
There are few things changing .
The NHS App has launched. Really don’t know what that’ll do here. It may identify more contacts and do so in a more timely way, but we don’t haven’t seen the trial data.
Plus T&T still relies on people manually inputting contacts (app is anonymous) and might it mean people choose not to enter contacts as they think the app will do it automatically?
Test times still awful. Whilst has improved a little for home test kits, this offset by worsening performance for local/mobile test sites.
Once in the system, time performance largely similar to past weeks
And a new metric, median distance to a test site
Unlike an average, not skewed by some huge distances. But this is still only people who take up a test that's miles away, so doesn't reflect what people are offered. Not to mention inequals of people who don't have car etc.
And after all this, it looks as though more money might be going to T&T - now £12bn(!) up from £10bn earlier in the year.
Cases continue to rise, please take care and access support when you need to. Do try to get tested if you have symptoms, and isolate if required. It will make a huge difference to what happens in the coming weeks.
Finally - we've just published a big explainer on T&T, please do take a look.
There's tonnes in there and it really tries to unpick what's happened plus looks at what might be done to address ongoing challenges.
Gov data shows how price promos are more likely to be applied to unhealthy junk food rather than healthier foods.
And rather than saving people ££, they can lead to around 22% *more* purchases than would otherwise happen, with *more* money spent and *more* consumption.
That's why companies use these promotions.
That's also why the policy was in the obesity strategy in the first place. The irony being that it is more likely to help than hinder the impact of the cost of living crisis on individuals and families.
In today's @Telegraph, Sally O'Brien & I discuss @HealthFdn / @IpsosUK polling results on public attitudes to gov policy on alcohol, tobacco, & unhealthy food (no £-wall🔓)
🧵Tl,dr: While gov has a preference for individual responsibility, the public still think gov should act.
Gains in healthy life-expectancy have stalled, childhood obesity continues to rise, alcohol-related hospital admissions are up, and tobacco still causes over 500,000 admissions a year.
And there are huge inequalities with more deprived areas disproportionately impacted.
Yet the recent trend of unwinding public health policy continues.
The tobacco control plan is unpublished, junk food ad bans have been delayed, plans for a national approach to health inequalities have gone & there's been nothing on alcohol since 2012.
First the good news. COVID cases in hospital clearly falling, in all ages, regions (except perhaps still plateauing in Yorkshire and Humber).
There's still a lag on cases in intensive care and on deaths, but they'll drop soon as well.
Flu, however, seems to be on the rise.
Overall case & admission rates are relatively low, but trending up.
And with a higher % of lab respiratory samples (sent in by dr from people with chest symptoms) testing for flu than at the same time in the past 5 yrs. i.e., it's early
This is a really helpful and timely piece of work by @davidfinchthf.
Along with last week's @TheIFS report on how government ££ are spent, it's clear that we need to do more to align public health funding with local needs. 🧵
Over the last decade, gains in life expectancy in England have stalled.
And it will be no surprise that the impact has not been felt evenly by everyone.
While life expectancy continues to increase for people living in the least deprived parts of the country, people from the most deprived communities are dying earlier.
This type of shortsighted policy review has reared its head again.
Health is an *asset* & the types of obesity policies being looked at here are exactly the ones that are both most effective AND most likely to narrow inequalities. 🧵