On 9/12/1960, JFK told the Greater Houston Ministerial Association: "I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish;...and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all…." (1/8)
“…For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew—or a Quaker or a Unitarian or a Baptist….Today I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you….” (2/8)
"...Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end; where all men and all churches are treated as equal;...where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind;..." (3/8)
"...and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood…." (4/8)
"...This is the kind of America I believe in, and this is the kind I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died for in Europe. No one suggested then that we may have a 'divided loyalty,' that we did 'not believe in liberty,'....” (5/8)
“…And in fact, this is the kind of America for which our forefathers died, when they fled here to escape religious test oaths...; when they fought for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom….” (6/8)
"...[C]ontrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me." (7/8)
An ugly undercurrent of religious bigotry required our first Catholic president to make this appeal when he was running.
60 years later, I would hope we’re in a better place that leaves no room for allowing a nominee’s religious beliefs to influence #SCOTUS nominations. (8/8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Notre Dame Law School’s @DerektMuller conducted a comprehensive survey of the ideological leanings of the biggest law firms’ pro bono work at the Supreme Court as a way of gaining insight into the firms’ own ideological leanings.
The findings published expose just how deep the left-wing bias really is inside prestigious law firms.
Muller looked at pro bono amicus briefs submitted in Supreme Court merits docket cases.
Over the four years between October 2018 and June 2022, Muller counted 851 amicus briefs (of the 3,280 filed in total) that were likely submitted pro bono by firms among the top 100 measured by gross revenue (the “Am Law 100”).
Overall, 64% of those briefs were aligned with the liberal position versus 31% with the conservative position, while the balance were in support of neither party.
Chief Justice John Roberts will soon appoint a new director of the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts—the chief administrative officer of the federal courts (AO).
Recently the AO has inappropriately engaged in the Left's DEI practices so it’s imperative the next person chosen for the role refocuses on doing the actual job.
The AO came under fire last year when it was reported by @DailyCaller that it launched several DEI-focused initiatives in recent years, including launching its “Model Intern Diversity Program” in 2018 and even hiring a DEI officer in 2020.
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
Senator @LindseyGrahamSC on how the Democrats’ unhinged rhetoric attacking the Supreme Court helped lead to an assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh:
@LindseyGrahamSC “This is about an ongoing effort to destroy this Court, to destroy Clarence Thomas’s reputation, to pack the Court, to get your way, to make sure the Supreme Court as it exists today can’t function.” - Senator @LindseyGrahamSC 🎯
Today's unanimous ruling in Groff v. DeJoy further extends the Court's string of religious liberty victories. 🧵/1
For decades, the Court’s decision in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison contained language that set an unfortunate standard for review of Title VII employment discrimination claims based on religion. Lower courts would overwhelmingly side with employers whenever a religious… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
With its opinion today, the Court turned that tide by ruling against the postal service, which failed to accommodate a strict Sabbatarian Christian who observes as a sacred obligation keeping the Sabbath day holy and avoiding work on Sundays. /3
Senator Graham is already making the connection between today’s hearing and intimidation of the justices.
He reminds that Sen. Schumer promised the justices would “reap the whirlwind,” and here we are.
/1
Flashback:
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” - Senator Chuck Schumer
. @GovRonDeSantis just signed a law permitting the death penalty for individuals convicted of raping children under the of age 12 — which would likely be challenged before the Supreme Court.
I was clerking for Justice Thomas at the Court when the underlying case (Kennedy vs. Louisiana) was decided in 2008.
Patrick Kennedy was found guilty of brutally raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter. She actually needed surgery to repair the physical damage he inflicted.