Thread by @soychicka

Solicitation cases against Robert Kraft et al have been dropped because an appellate court ruled video of 'table showers' at Orchids of Asia in Jupiter FL was improperly obtained -> inadmissible.

Licenses should be required by LAW that all private 'massage' sessions are recorded

https://twitter.com/AaronKatersky/status/1309201807877562370

I don't necessarily mean top-down video recording where the participants are visible on-screen - it would be possible to monitor multiple aspects of sessions in other ways - participant positions + motion sensor arrays - think along the lines of anonymized kinect footage...

If someone visits a known trafficking establishment, saliva / volatile chem assays could be used to show presence and concentration of the relative proportion of biochemical markers that appear post-orgasm.

Hell, get some orgasm-sniffing dogs and park them outside the front door

At minimum, that should give enough probable cause to request access to monitoring data to help ensure those who frequent massage parlors for the "table showers" will be forced to testify under oath.

Yes - this is shorthand summary and I don't address nuance. It's big picture.

If an industry has problems, it's up to that industry to fulfill the conditions to mitigate or obviate those problems.

The cost of compliance is low; R&D could be funded by government research funds, and equipment/compliance could be provided as part of the licensure process.

But there is no reason why legitimate massage parlors and spas should be unwilling to follow a set of standards to clean up their industry, so long as they maintain the privacy of clients (at least the ones who aren't committing crimes.)

And - random fact - just because I have come across lots of weird shit in the past hour of research into post-orgasm biochemistry:

The science coming out of the Cow Pavilion is some of the weirdest shit you'll ever read.
eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/…