Friday question: For such a visionary project, why does the EU have so many cowardly, mediocre politicians? Sure, some talk a visionary game, but when it’s time to act or announce policy proposals - even before debate & compromises - it’s almost always a surrender of EU values.
They almost always cave in to the extremist xenophobes, in particular. Look at the depressing appeasement strategy behind vdl’s “Migration Pact” to take just one recent example. Or Weber’s (& Tusk’s) endless cowering towards, and empowerment of, Orbán.
If we had had weak leaders like this back in the day, there never would have been any European integration project. They would have said, oh dear, the Nazis & fascists don’t want it, so we can’t do it. Just pathetic.
Appeasement of autocrats...
Why do some European leaders think it will work this time?
✅ Condemned 7/10 killings by Palestinian armed groups;
✅ Questioned legality of some Israeli airstrikes;
✅ Condemned Israel's collective punishment of Palestinians & called for targeted sanctions on those responsible;
1/n
Belgium has also:
✅ Expressed support for the International Criminal Court’s role and its ongoing investigation on the situation in Palestine, which includes jurisdiction over the current hostilities between the Israeli government and Palestinian armed groups.
2/n
In addition, the Belgian federal parliament has introduced a bill to ban trade with settlements in occupied territories.
3/n
Convincing people that they have fundamental rights takes no effort at all.
Convincing them that others have fundamental rights is the hard part.
I want to write about these things in ways that might encourage new people to warm to the idea of universal human rights.
I don’t feel you can do that by using language and tropes that immediately spark “culture war” reactions - those cliché phrases that close minds instantly.
That’s been the purpose of my newsletter over the past year: to find language that brings people closer to understanding the fundamental rights that bind us together.
Dans l'après-midi du 2 octobre 2018, l'éminent journaliste #saoudien et chroniqueur du Washington Post Jamal Khashoggi s'est rendu au consulat saoudien d'Istanbul pour obtenir les documents nécessaires pour son mariage. C'est la dernière fois que sa fiancée l'a vu.
Des agents saoudiens l’ont assassiné à l'intérieur du consulat et ont découpé son corps en morceaux.
Il ne s'agissait pas simplement d'une opération véreuse. En 2019, une enquête de l'ONU a mis en évidence "une coordination, des ressources et des finances gouvernementales importantes" derrière l'assassinat.