1/11
Some further notes on the upcoming Eskom BESS Project.
Annual Report 2019 page 27;
"focused on the African market" hence why the Eskom project, easily the biggest in the world to date, first in Africa to be grid connected and right on #BMN doorstep, is firmly in BMN sights.
2/11
And;
"the country’s characteristic demand profile, which lasts for six hours a day and peaks twice a day, makes the
economics especially favourable for long-duration, nearly limitless recycling technologies such as VRFBs."
3/11
from a company that is partnered with the IDC of South Africa (see below) and the words 'strong competitive advantage' come to mind.
But of course, BMN now knows it needs a big VRFB partner to meet the JV requirements or its got to buy the VRFBs as a project developer.
4/11
To be the project developer, BMN are still going to need partners, if they are to mount an assault on the first 80MW tender because i still fear proven experience is lacking.
If they go down the Rongke Power route, then the following is of interest.
5/11
For several years BMN have talked about future local assembly and manufacture of VRFBs in South Africa.
On page 46 of the Annual Report, that they talk about "during the year BMN communicated its approach to VRFB manufacturing, including how it will work with VRFB OEMs."
6/11
What that does is set out the idea that manufacturing will be OEM led because BMN have been very clear, that they will retain a "minority stake" in these companies only.
So perhaps this is all about delivering sufficient project wins in Africa, to justify OEM set up there.
6/11
They then go on to state ;
"Bushveld Energy takes a holistic approach to the full value chain, from vanadium material and electrolyte sales
through to energy storage and project development in Africa, where we deploy VRFBs."
That indicates that in Africa, the role will be..
7/11
. .one of project developer and VRFB deployment, where possible.
I posted recently the @CruxInvestor interview from 11th Nov 2019 and the clear message that "if it is in Africa, then its (Bushveld Energy ) extremely active."
Well the Eskom BESS project isn't just in Africa, it is where all BMN mines operate and their influence is greatest. So how active does that make BMN/BE?
In the 11th Nov interview Mikhail Nikomarov also went on to say ;
9/11
"So this integration allows us to capture value, sometimes from 4 or 6 activities on just one single project."
What he was talking about there was the value chain that BMN have spent these last few years piecing together, coupled with Bushveld Energy's management/inputs.
10/11
Meaning there are multiple ways that BMN can attack the Eskom Project, depending on the demands of tender.
What's key for me, is that for a VRFB to win this tender, it has to have BMN behind it, in some shape or form because they hold the competitive advantage, for many
11/11
reasons, some of which are highlighted above.
Meaning any BMN/BE backed VRFB tender, will highly likely be the best VRFB tender by some distance.
So it'll be about BMN/BE's vanadium JV vs lithium-ion and again, for reasons stated above, I really fancy their chances.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/16
I've been doing some detailed research on #STX and found something important.
With scrips growth now back on track and net pricing expanding the 2 biggest risks I could find were working capital to breakeven and a covenant breach on the SWK financing.
2/ The $5.7m AOP Milestone Monetisation + the $10m Sallyport invoice factoring facility are stated by the broker as delivering them to +cash flows by H2 2025.
The same message is coming from the company although I could imagine a small amount of additional equity in 2025.
3/ The numbers say this would be small (c. $5m) and could well be in the form of a further expansion to the Sallport facility as expanding revenues allow it.
That then leaves the SWK finance covenants.
They are based on quarterly rolling group revenues up until Q2 2025.
1/16
It's difficult to call this market but my view is that assuming no more operational glitches #TGR now steadily re-rates as the operations sign off the various stages to 30ktpa.
2/ Front-end valuations should depend on where graphite prices go but as Syrah demonstrated yesterday (graphite fines not large flake) orders are buoyant.
Forward orders there running at 90,000 tons which are 50% of their current yearly output. So substantial.
3/ Note also Syrah cannot produce for less than FOB C1 $543/t even at 15,000 tons per month output and that's fines.
It is clear after last night's presentation that TGR C1 costs have also risen but this is to be expected in this current market.
1/12
Here are Verde Agritech's expected sales targets for 2022 which were revised in May and offer a significant read across to #HMI and what it can achieve this year and also.
1/9 In a previous #HMI thread, I highlighted that the $600k write-down in the FY2021 accounts meant that trade debtors (so effectively trade receivables) almost doubled between YE 2020 and YE 2021.
1/18
I've been running an extensive exercise on Verde Agritech also a relatively new but expanding fertiliser producer based just c. 70km from #HMI in Minas Gervais in Brazil. The results to date are rather fascinating and certainly worthy of review.
2/ Verde is a TSX-listed producer with a current plant capacity nearly double the size of HMI (0.6Mtpy) but with a phase 2 expansion due to come online in 2023 which would take output to 2.4Mtpy.
So a much bigger operation to come and soon.
3/ Those that remember my 5th July numbers on #HMI sales prices will perhaps remember that they demonstrated a $53.20/t average sale price for 2021.
At the average achieved AUD/BRL for 2021 of 4.054, this equated to an average price of BRL216.