“Some of America's most experienced foreign policy leaders are sounding the alarm about disinformation. From disinformation, from a few fabricated facts to full-scale propaganda campaigns, it has gotten serious.”
“The power of disinformation has spread so fast and so far, that in only a few short years it now infects almost every aspect of our lives... We can't keep treating it as a distant danger. Disinformation now needs to be treated like other top global risks.”
“So, what does it mean for a company to take a strong stand against disinformation? First, it's about recognizing that the problem has become bigger than your brand.”
“Companies need to invest in marketing campaigns that do more than sell a product or service, they help inform the public. Include more educational elements into your advertising.”
“And it's about more than the marketing budget. Companies have a substantial self-interest in creating more tools and technology to track disinformation. They will be one of the major beneficiaries of making content more credible.”
I feel a little like those people who raise alarm about a looming danger no one take seriously. Disinfo is one of the biggest threats to democracy globally. LGE2021 is going to be rough. Disinfo tactics have changed. Most get this info on social media. 99% in SA have smartphones
But y’know, I’ll do my bit ✌🏾 You cannot deal with disinfo with a letter to the editor, a rebuttal or ad, Disinfo tactics are much more covert, sinister & sophisticated. Measures must be in place to prevent possibly irreparable damage to your brand be it public or private.
The internet matters. What is said on the internet about you or your brand matters. If it is disinformation it may stick. People are more likely to believe negative over positive information. Have a Good Friday y’all. Sorry for the making it so bleak with this info. 😬❤️😘
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starlink. Hard-headedness and a deep aversion to being strong-armed and bullied aside, I'll be rational and explore workarounds about it.
First of, Elon Musk is not without options. He is no sorry baby we all need to feel terribly sorry for. There are plenty of South African billionaires he could partner with: talk to Motsepe. Talk to Oppenheimer, talk to Rupert. Ask how they do it. Partner. Figure it out. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. International conglomerates have navigated South Africa’s regulatory landscape, ask how they did it. At the end of the day, do you want to make a profit or no? Do you want that bag or no? Adapt to the regulations of the markets you operate in, or stall, your move, grown man.
Not a single tech company would dare not meet the stringent regulatory requirements the EU has for tech companies. You don't? Here's a $10 billion fine, how's them apples? What are we? The ugly stepsister? Sorry I've started being hard-headed again, breathe. K, k, k. Hands up in defeat. We go the legislative amendment route. Have you met legislatures? That would take YEARS. Go back to 1.
I must say though, it would be kinda nice to have the kind of leverage Latin America and Canada have exercised, no? I am just saying from a strategic perspective. Shrug.
At the end of the day, this could work. It just needs will.
But the greater point is this: the government can't go above any legislative requirements, and the Constitutional Court would strike that executive action down before we can finish writing "constitutional delinquent." It is a VERY VERY slippery slope. That legislation contravened, which one next? You mos allowed it for the one? Is that power you want to give away? It is really that boring, cold and dry, I fear. There is the option to amend. Cool. But if that is the route: you're going to have to WAIT. This is the very likely scenario: Legislation drafted and tabled in Parliament (a few months) -> Committee discussions where there will likely be major resistance and (stall for another few months) -> passed with ANC + DA -> promulgated by the President (a few months) -> stalled because constitutional challenge by EFF + MK (months, years) -> Concourt says it contravenes requirement for redress -> back to Parliament (years). Repeat over and over. THAT is the reality. FIGURE it out, but ok'salayo, the government cannot go above its legislative requirements.
Just to add about a Constitutional challenge. If nothing, we are a very litigious bunch. Don't nobody like some political lawfare than a South African 😂 That would take YEARS. It has to go to a High Court. Wait for a ruling. Regardless of the outcome, either party will appeal. Go to the Supreme Court. More months waiting for a ruling. Appealed again. Go to Constitutional Court. Wait for a ruling. That will take years. We need to be realistic about this. Letting emotional reaction rule you thinking about this is a recipe for a dry and unseasoned plate of ✨disappointment✨washed down with a glass of lukewarm water on a hot day.
1. Why is there so much denial of the genocide in Palestine on social media, despite overwhelming evidence thereof? The answer lies not in a lack of proof, but in deeply entrenched cognitive biases that dehumanise the people of Palestine. Facts struggle against hate. A 🧵🪡
2. Facts alone cannot overcome cognitive biases, especially when they challenge deep ideologies or moral self-perceptions. Genocide denialism thrives not on ignorance but on the rejection of uncomfortable truths. Denial of the genocide in Palestine is no exception.
3. Cognitive dissonance fuels denial further. Supporting human rights while ignoring the genocide in Palestine creates discomfort. Instead of confronting complicity, many rationalise violence or cling to narratives that protect their worldview, even at the cost of truth.
Part 2: The Digital Xenophobia Movement and Foreign Influence Operations (FIO)
An EXTREMELY long thread. 🧵🪡
1. At the get, I must make this clear. There are people with legitimate concerns about illegal immigration. That is not the issue of contention here. The issue is with those who use those legitimate concerns to polarize, destabilize SA, spread hate speech & incite violence
2. That is my quibble: hate speech & incitement of violence – illegal conduct in the common law. And in a country founded on the protection of human rights for all within its borders, including immigrants, legal or not, it is abhorrent & must be condemned. Many have.
The Genesis of Xenophobia Social Media Influence Operation and its impact, a thread. The why, who, and how.🧵🪡
This will be an extremely long thread that might upset some parties and “movements.” I'm generally unphased by Twitter mob attacks. Go for it. The truth is the truth.
1. On an occasion such as this, we should, perhaps, start from the beginning. So, let me begin. I am an African, as Mbeki once said. The serious point of what has become "digital xenophobia," is that it is mostly against African foreign nationals. It is so saddening.
2. I could discuss the psychology behind this, but that’s opinion. I’m here for cold, hard facts—data and numbers. Before diving into the evidence, let me explain how the data around "digital xenophobia" is collected and analyzed - through SMA (Social Media Analytics)
I asked ChatGPT to describe your favorite politicians, except make it funny. The point was to see whether it could still “roast,” a prompt removed early on. Herewith, ChatGPT roasting your faves, but still nice.
A thread of kind (ish) roasts. 🪡🧵
1. Steenhuisen:
John Steenhuisen is like the perennial high school class president who just never left the student council. Picture this: a guy with the energy of a motivational speaker, the charisma of your overly enthusiastic uncle at a family reunion, and a passion for politics that makes him the designated driver of the Democratic Alliance (DA) in South Africa. He's the guy who probably color-codes his socks and has a detailed five-year plan for his houseplants. When he's not busy rallying for the DA, you can imagine him practicing his speeches in front of a mirror, with a fervor that could put a Shakespearean actor to shame. In the world of South African politics, John Steenhuisen is the organized, slightly nerdy hero we didn't know we needed, but definitely got.
2. Malema:
Julius Malema is like the rockstar of South African politics, complete with the charisma, controversy, and unpredictability of a headline act. Imagine a politician who wields his red beret like a magician's hat, pulling out fiery speeches and bold declarations with the flair of a stage performer. He's got the energy of a political dynamo and the audacity to match—kind of like if Che Guevara and Kanye West had a love child who decided to lead a revolution. Whether he's calling for radical change or stirring up a media storm, Julius is the master of keeping everyone on their toes. In the theater of South African politics, he's the lead actor in a drama that’s always one tweet away from trending.
I’m on a road trip and I’m trying not to fall asleep. I’m obvs a passenger.
Time for a ridiculously long thread again. This time we’re talking definitions of social media manipulation tactics often use by parties, companies, foreign influence ops etc.
A 🧵🪡
1. As a start, this is a constantly evolving field, and the terminology changes because tactics change. Sometimes, there isn’t agreement on definitions. For example, fun fact: there is no real agreement in academia on what AI is and should be. But we move.
2. Disinformation: false information that is deliberately created or disseminated with the express purpose to cause harm. Producers of disinformation typically have political, financial, psychological or social motivations.