Post

@LightspeedIndia

@Rephrase_AI

@Rephrase_AI

@Rephrase_AI

More from @MohapatraHemant

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Nov 25

One of the things we hear often about AI is how it’ll bring a productivity surge to society and have a deflationary impact on GDP. Technical revolutions, over a long enough horizon, do tend to make societies better off economically but we wanted to go deeper into what is the nature of productivity today, where does it come from, what do the productivity curves for large tech & non-tech categories look like, and then understand exactly where, and how will AI have the most impact on these productivity curves. @AbhiramTarimala and I dug into some of these core concepts in today's piece and a lot of python code & charting later, we present to you "AI - the last employee, How bigtech AI CAPEX spending will reshape future corporate cost structures" - link at the end of the 🧵:

Productivity = Automation + Specialization. Nations grow GDP/capita by automating (do more with the same people) or specializing (create higher-margin products). AI supercharges both. Taiwan going from an agrarian economy with a GDP/capita of ~150$ in the 1950s to a semiconductor powerhouse with a GDP/capita of $7000 by the 1980s is an example. Also worth noting that without automation, it’s hard to free up enough resources to move up the specialization curve. We’ll see later in the article that the same logic would apply to businesses — improving specialization & automation is directly related to productivity.

Our starting hypothesis was that as most orgs scale, fixed costs (FC) go up, and marginal productivity (MP) goes down. We want to be on the "genius savant" lines on FC and MP curves; instead most cos are the orange lines. A genius savant company will scale infinitely with very few people, and will maintain high productivity forever.

Read 10 tweets

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Jul 13

~12yrs ago, I got a job @Google. Those were still early days of cloud. I joined GCP @<150M ARR & left @~4B (excld GSuite). Learned from some of the smartest ppl in tech. But we also got a LOT wrong that took yrs to fix. Much of it now public, but here’s my ring-side view👇

By 2008, Google had everything going for it w.r.t. Cloud and we should’ve been the market leaders, but we were either too early to market or too late. What did we do wrong? (1) bad timing (2) worse productization & (3) worst GTM.

We were 1st to “containers” (lxc) & container management (Borg) - since '03/04. But Docker took LXC, added cluster management, & launched 1st. Mesosphere launched DCOS. A lot of chairs were thrown around re: google losing this early battle, though K8 kinda won the war, eventually 👏

Read 14 tweets

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Jul 5

So now that Nvidia has far outstripped the market cap of AMD and Intel, I thought this would be a fun story to tell. I spent 6+yrs @ AMD engg in mid to late 2000s helping design the CPU/APU/GPUs that we see today. Back then it was unimaginable for AMD to beat Intel in market-cap (we did in 2020!) and for Nvidia to beat both! In fact, AMD almost bought Nvidia but Jensen wasn’t ready to sell unless he replace Hector Ruiz of AMD as the CEO of the joint company. The world would have looked very different had that happened. Here’s the inside scoop of how & why AMD saw the GPU oppty, lost it, and then won it back in the backdrop of Nvidia’s far more insane trajectory, & lessons I still carry from those heady days:

After my MS, I had an offer from Intel & AMD. I chose AMD at 20% lower pay. Growing up in India, AMD was always the hacker’s choice - they allowed overclocking, were cheaper, noisier, grungier and somehow just felt like the underdog david to back against the Intel goliath!

Through the 90s, AMD was nipping @ Intel’s heels but ~2003 we were 1st to mkt w/ a 64-bit chip &, for the FIRST time, had a far superior core architecture. Oh boy, those were exciting times! Outside of SV, I haven’t seen a place where hardcore engg was so revered. Maybe NASA.

Read 18 tweets

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Jul 2

Speed of execution is the moat inside which live all other moats. Speed is your best strategy. Speed is your strongest weapon. Speed has THE highest correlation to mammoth outcomes. Those who conflate speed w/ 'thoughtlessness' haven't seen world class execution @ speed. E.g.:

Many confuse speed w/ impatience. Impatience is your boss pinging you @ 9pm then calling @ 6am to check if a task is done. Speed is strategic. It is a permeated sense of urgency built w/ a shared belief that what you are doing is important & if you don’t do it, someone else will.

AMZN defines speed. Their 2015 SEC filing () is a must-read: (1) deliberate irreversible decisions (~10%?) (2) expedite all else. Founding teams need to learn how to apply judgment w/ <70% of data (<50% for early stage cos). Move fast, “disagree & commit”. shorturl.at/xDEU1

Read 10 tweets

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Jun 8

For those of you following anything SaaS, you'll note there have been a lot of calls around 'saas is dead' lately. If you are wondering why, I wrote about this last yr here👇. This isn't just about saas but rather a 50yr macro CAPEX/OPEX cycle at play under the hood. : shorturl.at/sJ4IZ

Over the last 20yrs, both the cost of building and distributing software has COMPLETELY crashed. 20 years ago, it’d take a 4yr CS degree to write software, today thanks to internet anyone who wants to work hard can learn to code. In 20yrs world has gone from 5-6M software developers to 60M+ today. Second, the cost of distribution has gone to zero thanks to SaaS. I remember the days MSFT used to ship us a new MSDN CD monthly; imagine if you had to burn 60M CDs monthly as MSFT today? Software is shipped hourly, globally, all at once to everyone now.

Result? A Cambrian explosion in SaaS Globally. Every revenue pool is fragmented across lots of players now. This is also why even at $200-300M ARR scale, network effects of brand/WOM are becoming harder to see -- there are very few to none of "no one gets fired for buying IBM" type businesses today. Public markets can't foresee a 300M ARR business going to 1B ARR as easily as they would in the past. Ergo, multiples compression across the board.

Read 9 tweets

Hemant Mohapatra

@MohapatraHemant

Feb 10, 2023

This is for SaaS & esp India-SaaS but applies more broadly as well. I’ve been investing in India-SaaS since '18 & harping abt this endlessly to anyone who’d listen. I’ll say it again: the age of “business model innovation” in SaaS is over. It’s done. What does this mean? 🧵1/20

If you don’t have a fundamental product or tech innovation at the heart of your company, you are looking at a 10yr slog ending in a $5-10M ARR plateau → a [10-20]% CAGR lifestyle biz; a sub-$50M M&A by the category leader; or a slow death to $0. What changed, you may ask? 2/20

10yrs ago, “GTM as product” still had a shot. Building a basic SaaS product was *hard*. Cloud was in relative infancy. At GCP, the 1st thing customers would ask us was ‘why should we entrust our mission critical software, infra, data to a 3rd party?” Today we laugh @ this Q. 3/20

Read 20 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Hemant Mohapatra

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @MohapatraHemant

Hemant Mohapatra

Hemant Mohapatra

Hemant Mohapatra

Hemant Mohapatra

Hemant Mohapatra

Hemant Mohapatra

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!