Last night we learned, unequivocally, that the FBI acted deliberately to undermine @realDonaldTrump.
Think we’ll get any follow up from all the outlets who made the face of bad FBI behavior, Peter Strzok (@petestrzok), into some kind of hero?
The worst offender had to be @MSNBC. It would be an understatement to say that they made a martyr out of him.
They also helped push his new book, and covered for a theory (that has aged poorly) that people were quitting the FBI because of “unacceptable politicization.”
It won’t surprise you that @maddow was leading the charge on this one.
She made Strzok out to be a wrongly defamed hero who had done nothing but try to defend the country.
And here’s @MaddowBlog parroting these terrible talking points back.
I’m not sure it’s still fair to say that “Republicans may not realize what they’re in for as they try to make a public stunt of vilifying Peter Strzok.”
MSNBC wasn’t alone, of course. Here’s @nytimes pushing Strzok’s new book.
I feel like reporting from @seanmdav and @MZHemingway at @FDRLST shines a lot more light on “the bureau’s internal debate over investigating President Trump.”
I’m not sure I would agree that Strzok has gotten “complete vindication” in all this. Nor do I think I would have had him on to hawk his book if I were them.
And they also got their big names involved. These takes from @brianstelter have aged...imperfectly.
Still thinking it’s a different reality to suggest that Strzok was part of “the single biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in American history,” Brian?
A similar perspective here from @oliverdarcy. I think by now it should be obvious why Strzok/Page was a massive story in ‘right-wing’ media.
My question now is: why has “Russian collusion” ceased to be a story in left-wing media?
There were a lot of outlets that pushed this one and space is getting tight. Here’s @NPR and @ABC.
@washingtonpost reminds us yet again that “news analysis” should not be an activity that any reputable news outlet engages in.
Perhaps the outlet that comes out of all of this looking the worst is @BuzzFeedNews.
This one is a hall of fame take.
But I’ll admit that @Newsweek is right behind them.
And it wasn’t just the media that got this wrong.
Here’s everyone’s favorite member of Congress, @RepSwalwell, brought to you courtesy of @MSNBC.
In retrospect, I think @tedlieu may have been the most irresponsible member of Congress not named Schiff throughout this whole process.
I don’t think @realDonaldTrump or anyone else is going to be rushing to thank Strzok any time soon.
@RepBonnie definitely gets the award for weirdest response for suggesting FBI agents should be “kissing” Strzok (that was actually part of the problem).
Oh, and @RepCohen suggested Strzok should have a Purple Heart. (He’s since walked that suggestion back).
Of course, the galaxy brain blue checks also got involved.
I know I’ve said this before, but this first one might truly be the worst @JRubinBlogger take of all time.
Also a long list, but I think this may be my favorite @SethAbramson take of all time.
From behind the block, @deanobeidallah has some perspectives that haven’t aged well.
Of course, the NeverTrump gang got involved on this one. Also a second entry from behind the block, here’s twitter’s worst prognosticator, @therickwilson.
Hard for me to imagine that this is “not a scandal.”
What this boils down to, in my eyes, is that the Dems & the media have made it an art form lately to take a shady character - Strzok, Avenatti, Michael Cohen, etc. - and make them a hero because they oppose Trump.
I know it’s been a few days, but the entire legacy media ran with the claim that Don Lemon was arrested for doing journalism, when he was actually indicted because a grand jury found he violated worshippers’ freedom of expression.
Quick live🧵thread🧵, starting with @nytimes. ⤵️
Same thing at @NBCNews.
Omitted from the headline is what the actual charges are: interfering with these churchgoers rights.
Predictably, @CNN has gone to bat for Lemon.
What’s at issue isn’t “reporting” of a “protest,” and claiming to the contrary is pretty obviously misleading.
There’s another media hoax from Minnesota. Legacy outlets churned out headlines about a 5-year-old child used as “bait” by ICE.
The reality? The kid’s father, an illegal immigrant, abandoned him when he saw the agents. As even these outlets later concede.
Look ⤵️
Here’s how these hoaxes start. @washingtonpost alleges ICE used a 5-year-old kid as “bait” to arrest his father.
Not until five paragraphs into the piece do they acknowledge what really happened: the child’s father, an illegal immigrant, abandoned him when he saw ICE.
But this allegation was everywhere. We saw the same thing from @AP.
Explosive claim in the headline: “used as ‘bait’” (from the school, no less)
Reality: six paragraphs down, father abandoned child.
Do you remember, all of four weeks ago, when democracy was imperiled by CBS News, under new management, delaying a 60 Minutes segment about a prison in El Salvador?
The segment aired last weekend.
Democracy survived. The takes haven’t.
Just look. Screenshots ⤵️
I usually start with the media but I’ve gotta flip that here, because the dumbest voices came from the halls of Congress.
@ChrisMurphyCT, as someone “warning about democracy’s potential disintegration” (his words) called it proof that the media has been “coopted by the regime.”
For @SenMarkey, delaying a segment was “what government censorship looks like.”
With an ambitious new health care plan proposed by the Trump administration, you should read some of the recent pieces on the subject at @commonplc. Quick 🧵👇
And out this week is @Chris_Griz on why market concentration looms over the health care industry, undercutting more a more hands-off approach: commonplace.org/p/chris-griswo…
For a real and much-needed alternative to Obamacare, dive into @ChrisEmper’s explanation of community health centers, and why they could unlock better outcomes for patients: commonplace.org/p/chris-emper-…
With the news that Walz’s reelection campaign won’t survive the spiraling child care center fraud scandal in his state, I wanted to reup some of the worst legacy media efforts to put lipstick on this particular pig.
Follow along: ⤵️
I have to start with @nytimes, who seemed positively incensed that a video from @nickshirleyy caught fire, accusing him of being “in search of politically charged footage,” while burying whether there were any kids at these child care centers in the first place.
This from the same @nytimes who a few weeks ago wrote an extensive piece about “how fraud swamped Minnesota’s social services system on Tim Walz’s watch.”