Craig Profile picture
Sep 26, 2020 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Hey @ianbremmer--you're using incorrect data as the denominator. To be fair, FL puts it out on the dashboard, but using the difference in the daily "Total People Tested" number is flawed, and pretty obviously so. Here's why...
First, here's your tweet and graphic. The graphic is clearly using the day-over-day difference in the Total People Tested metric, which is what @COVID19Tracking uses (last I checked), and which is wildly inaccurate when seeking out current testing.
That number measures only the number of people tested *for the first time ever*. So anyone ever tested--in April, May, June, whenever--will not show up here if they test again tomorrow. This excludes tens of thousands of tests every single day.
In fact, here are pics of today's dashboard numbers for Florida. If you just take the difference in the "Total" from yesterday to today (5,213,142 - 5,186,646), you get 26,496. Yet the total number of residents tested from the previous day was 66,708.

No wonder the % is so high.
Think of what it means to remove everyone ever tested. Anyone tested tomorrow who was one of the 5.2M people ever tested before will not be included in the denominator. This removes tens of thousands of people every day, and makes the % positive skyrocket.
For a simple example of what this does, take a quick read of the email I sent to @COVID19Tracking about the discrepancy above (and requesting they use the other reported data in the state daily report). I provide a scenario of how this would look in the first half.

Here it is:
To their credit, @COVID19Tracking responded and agreed that this number will *not* capture any repeat tester--no matter when their first test was.

As far as I'm aware, no other state's positive percentage denominator (total tested) does this.
The worst thing about this is that it gets *worse* as time goes on, because more people continue to get excluded from the day's test count.

How many of the tens of thousands of people getting tested tomorrow will be excluded? A lot, when a quarter of the state won't count.
Florida puts out other data though in their daily state report--and its very easy to capture better data, which is why I switched to that a while back once I realized how crazy it is to use the difference in unique people tested. Here's the link:
ww11.doh.state.fl.us/comm/_partners…
You're at 1K likes and 257 retweets as I type this, but it'd be nice to get a clarification based on the above.

Folks can still disagree with @GovRonDeSantis decisions, of course (and no doubt many will), but they ought to do it with clear eyes in terms of the data.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Craig

Craig Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLawyerCraig

Jan 24
A few days ago, I stumbled upon an exchange between @michaelsfuhrer, @greg_travis, @karencutter4, @PienaarJm.

The crux is Greg’s claim of a sharp increase from 2022 to 2023 in 18-44yo deaths from disease in the US (his graphic below).

Greg is wrong.

Join me on a 12-pack 🧵 Image
2/ It quickly became apparent that the main point of contention was whether including R99-coded deaths (“Other ill-defined and unspecified causes of mortality”) in Greg's definition of deaths from disease, as they are later re-coded to non-disease deaths. Image
3/ Oh, but not to worry. Greg states that "R99 itself is a tiny portion of overall deaths and generally resolves to <2,000 deaths a month overall (out of 300K deaths a month)."

True, Greg—but how long do they take to resolve

Quite a while, it seems... Image
Read 14 tweets
May 16, 2022
Weekly #Covid19 update in my Substack newsletter, The Issue. Just click the link below.

I'll excerpt a few portions below, but the upshot is: steady rise in cases/% positive, lower rise in Hosps, even lower for ICUs, and continued decline in deaths.
thelawyercraig.substack.com/p/covid-19-wee…
"Despite the rise in other metrics, deaths late last week dropped below 300 (7-day-average) for the first time since June/July 2021. ICU census is still well below pre-Omicron pandemic lows."
"Perhaps the best news right now is global Covid deaths. According to Our World in Data, global daily confirmed Covid-19 deaths (7DA) have dropped to 1,772. For comparison, . . . our lowest ever number globally was 4,436 before Omicron entered the picture."
Read 6 tweets
May 7, 2022
I cannot overstate the absolute idiocy of touting this study purporting to show Omicron is just as likely to send someone to the hospital or the morgue as Delta.

There are 2 enormous issues with this study (among others, I'm sure).

Thread 🧵
2/ ISSUE #1: The authors use PCR positives as the case denominator and just assume that the "case-to-infection" ratio was similar between all 4 periods. Unbelievable.

The fact that a study can look at the data and just say this boggles my mind. Just read that green highlighting!
3/ Here were Massachusetts' peak positive testing percentages for the 4 different periods in the study (data = @CDCgov)

8.69% - Winter 20-21
2.62% - Spring 21 (sub-1% for 38 days!)
4.47% - "Delta" (per the study)
23.36% - "Omicron"

One of these things is not like the others.
Read 10 tweets
May 6, 2022
#Covid19 in South Africa...5th wave? Well, that depends on what metric you use to define wave.

Thread 🧵🧵🧵
2/ If you look at 7DA cases, it's a clear increase. It's a long way off from the OG Omicron peak (and not quite as vertical), but they're still up ~4x in barely over 2 weeks.
3/ But everywhere is testing a bit less these days, so what about % positive? Yep, even more vertical, and more closely resembles the prior waves.

Of course, these are all just tests/infections. Let's look at outcomes...
Read 9 tweets
Apr 28, 2022
Heading your way, Music City.
Just realized this will be my first maskless flight since Covid hit.
In the airport generally, we’re probably at ~20% in masks. Seems a bit lower at my gate.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 2, 2022
Guess it's time for a #Covid19 data update, seeing as how tweets like Taylor Lorenz's below can somehow still exist as of this morning.

Thread 🧵🧵🧵
2/ CASES (7-day-average, @CDCgov data)

Current: 25,980 as of 3/31
Peak: 806,571 on 1/15/22

Down 96.8% from peak. Currently in a plateau-ish trough nationally, but rising in the Northeast right now (as many of us predicted).
3/ % POSITIVE (7-day-average, @CDCgov data)

Current: 2.5% as of 3/29
Peak: 29.49% on 1/7/22

Down 91.5% from peak. Seeing a rise nationally from recent low of 2.13%. During the entire pandemic, was only lower in June 2021 than our recent numbers.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(