De mortuis nil nisi bonum. But, may be, we should use the word Banyan Tree his sister used for #SPBalasubramanyam in a different context. Simply put, he didn't allow anyone to grow. Neither his siter Sailaja nor his son Charan got any support from him.
One can understand not promoting those without talent. But, shouldn't he have supported them after they proved their worth? Literally, no one knew that those great songs from Varsham or Manasantha Nuvve or Murari are sing by him. What went wrong?
Ultimately, his son wasn't able to compete with his father and left Telugu industry. Both Sailaja and Charan could have achieved more. Look at Krishna or ANR or NTR. Yes. It's nepotism. But, that's how life works. Charan's personal life was a disaster.
That's where you would guage the success of SPB as a person. The affection between father and son wasn't missing either, even in public. That makes one wonder if SPB understood what he is doing. Either he is too busy or he is too naive to understand the damage he did.
A close relative of mine was telling a while ago - when he went to his office one day, there was a man in his 50ssitting, waiting for him. Pithapuram Nageswara Rao it was. He introduced himself(his name is known and people didn't recognise him in person).
He was there in the office to get a loan. Madhavapeddi Satyam came as his surety. He was saying, When Ghantasala was alive, he used to leave some songs for us. Event Satyam used to leave some songs for us so that everyone can survive in the industry.
With tears in eyes he continued, all changed now - SPB sings all and leaves none for anyone. We are almost out of industry. I am here for this loan to create some sort of living. How can you console such a person - a person with fame shedding tears before a stranger in public?
One can understand such treatment to others. But, what I didn't understand was that, his son also got the same treatment. Makes me wonder if he really understood the consequences of his actions? I will still want to believe there is malice in what SPB did.
He just..didn't understand. A great singer he is, let's remember him for his achievements and nothing else. In fact, one can also argue, Charan failed because he is his father's son - putting it in Sailaja's words,
it's not just Charan, but any son who is the same profession as his father faces this problem - he is not as good as his father. Nagarjuna too faced that questions. Add no nepotism to this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ambedkar is a really tricky topic. He was born with a silver spoon - his family was the traditional palanquin bearers of the village temple in his place and he spent most of his childhood in a cantonment where his father was a teacher - what persecution are we talking here?
Now, as like many of the aspiring class of that India including a bulk of Indian freedom fighters, he went to England to study and returned back exactly how the main names like Jinnahbhai or Gandhi or Sardar Patel returned back. But, unlike the rest, he had another baggage with
him - caste. Many worked for the British and many openly sided them because it would hurt their career. How do you suppose great Congress leaders like Tej Bahadur Sapru made their money? Now, Ambedkar was the first legislator from his caste and people looked towards him as
Let me propose a slightly different theory over Brahmin hatred in India. We understand that they being the guardians of Hinduism had to face the ire of Buddhists and Jain's during their days of ascendancy but then these cults were just corrective actions on Hinduism.
Their retreat was chaotic and still had local support. On the other hand, Rashtrakutas are one of the first kingdoms in India who expanded that massively and rapidly. This introduced a level of low level churning in the government. To establish control in the kingdom
and to ensure the resurgence of Hinduism, Rashtrakutas planted Brahmins and Agraharas all over the kingdom. This was less of a counterweight to those two decaying cults but more as a direct challenge to the local nobility.
Another of Nehru's stupidities. When the Islamic Jinnahate of Pakistan was being formed, Kalat was dead against joining it. Ahmed Yar Khan in fact went to the extent of influencing the formation of independent Balochistan and Pashtunistan. What did Nehru do? Nothing.
Pakistan had the support of Kalat's Prime Minister Aslam Khan and Foreign Minister Douglas Fell but even after Jinnah appeared in Quetta in person, he wasn't able to achieve anything. Ahmed Yar Khan was supposed to meet Jinnah with the accession treaty but he feigned illness and
didn't bother to sign. Aslam Khan resigned in desperation. But, why was Jinnah in Quetta in person? What was the need? A month before, not just Kalat, but the whole of Balochistan had actually declared independence - in fact, Bizenjo, the head of Kalat National Party said,
Want to know how the concept of propaganda and narrative works? Try to find about the Dhulap family online. You will find literally nothing. Because according to the mainstream narrative, they are pirates. Reality? They headed Maratha Navy and oversaw both Salsette and Kolaba.
How is Sarjerao Dhulap related to Harji Dhulap? Are Krishnaji, Janoji and Rudraji brothers? Who succeeded Anandrao? Who ruled Vijaydurg in 1818? In fact, Brits said Vijaydurg fell in 1812 but somewhere else they wrote, they were chased away even in 1818 just before the war!!
Except these, there are only a handful of facts 1. Janoji was both a navy as well as army commander of note. He was the commandant of Chikballapur in one of the Maratha Wars. In parallel, Rudraji dropped 10k soldiers at Honavar messing up Hyder's plans.
Superficially, yes. But, its much more nuanced than that. Singh Sabha, Arya Samaj, Congress - all came at the same time. All of them directly or indirectly did the same thing - dilute Hinduism. Let's focus on Congress. Congress was created as a
vehicle that Indians don't go the wrong way. If you look at the earliest crop of Congress leaders, almost all of them are bible inspired Hindi social reformers. Ranade used bible to teach his wife English, Chandavarkar was excommunicated 15 years after he returned, Gokhale,
WC Banerjee and others, dig deeper, you will see much over how they tried to hollow out Hinduism. Along with this Social Reform, Congress had another agenda - create a hardcore pro-British intelligentsia which will percolate into the masses and mess up the minds.
I just can't understand. How can one be so stupid? For Murshidabad, India surrendered Khulna. Siliguri Corridor became leaner. Chittagong Hill Tracts were written off. Are we really saying India didn't have a visibility for all this or are we saying people had zero clue?
And Nehru didn't invade Noakhali and cut off Chittagong as a response to 1947 Pakistani Invasion of Kashmir. Seriously? Its a different thing that Sneha Kumar Chakma has already given him ideas and he was horrified at that.
In fact, even in 1951, Tripura asked why exactly isn't India bothered about Chakla Roshnabad. And anyone with commonsense would have pounced upon Noahkhali. Just look at the same map in blue without Sylhet, Tripura, Noahkhali and Chittagong. Sylhet was also actually borderline.