Miqdaad Versi Profile picture
Sep 26, 2020 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
There are many good critiques of this new chilling government guidance for PSHE, but I'd like to highlight in particular:

1. The government expects Muslim *children* to *have to* condemn actions of terrorists who claim to act in the name of Islam

gov.uk/guidance/plan-…
This is outrageous. The idea of having to condemn the actions of those you have nothing to do with, is unacceptable in general & even more so, for young children

It is important children learn that they aren't responsible for the actions of others, and have no duty to condemn
2. The choice to exclude Islamophobia from the guidance (noting government line that it is not a type of racism so is not included *at all*) not only speaks to the way the gvt prioritises the racism that suits it politically

It also speaks to how Islamophobia is totally ignored
3. The government is considering an "extreme position" to be accusations against the state (eg. Islamophobia is an institutional problem in the governing Party & in the policies it enacts?) which they determine to be "unsubstantiated"

Who will be the arbiter of this? Astonishing
4. The idea that promoting "divisive or victim narratives" is an extreme position if it is "harmful to British society" is astonishing.

Who decides if calling out the Islamophobia in our society falls under this? Is it Islamophobic groups that have influence at the top of gvt?
On my first tweet in this thread, the reason why I state that this affects children, is because it calls failure to condemn an "extreme political stance" objectively.

What is the consequence of that for (all?) children who do not want to be deemed to have an "extreme" stance?
We have to be honest about what this is doing - it is imposing the government's political narrative (which is seen to ignore Muslims if not being actively against Muslims) on its guidance for schools.

It's unacceptable
And whilst some may claim that it is not biased etc., let's be clear.

Whilst the government's rule breaking is well established, that would never put it in scope. This is targeting others...those it doesn't like.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Miqdaad Versi

Miqdaad Versi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @miqdaad

Oct 16, 2023
The Home Secretary is treading on dangerous ground here.

A peaceful demonstration is being slurred as "an intimidating mob" and a chant heard at the rally is being mischaracterised.

This is not okay. Thread.
This protest was almost entirely peaceful with minimal arrests.

With a protest of this size, there are always a handful of idiots, but from the reporting it seems there were far less than for example at this pro-Israel rally a couple of years ago.

The idea that those exercising their democratic right to protest it show solidarity to Palestinians, are somehow an "intimidating mob" is just not okay.

Read 11 tweets
Sep 29, 2023
After her racist smear was forcibly corrected (ht @cfmmuk), a source close to Braverman admits:

When referring to the 'grooming gangs phenomenon', she only meant high profile cases where Pakistani men were involved & not all group-based child sexual abuse
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Whilst this source calls the ruling "perverse", they are clearly wrong:

Only calling high-profile group-based child sexual abuse done by Pakistani men as "grooming gangs" is an astonishing admission, unjustifiable and incorrect Image
The IPSO ruling makes it clear how it is inaccurate. It is not a "political attack" - merely the correction of a false racist smear.

ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-re…
Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7, 2023
Outrageous the Home Secretary defends Douglas Murray as "mainstream"

She is *actively* promoting a man who said objectively racist & extreme things such as “Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board" & who has defended Tommy Robinson

But there's more



Image
Image
Image
Image
Douglas Murray says London has become "foreign" because "in 23 of London's 33 boroughs "white Britons" are now in a minority" i.e. being non-white, means you are foreign and can't be British

Is the government view *really* that this is a mainstream view? @Tories4Equality Image
@Tories4Equality Murray said "less Islam" is a solution to terrorism (whilst talking about Muslims).

Is it *really* a government position that this is a "mainstream" view and not extreme?


Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
Disgusting

Shawcross, Gove & The Times appear to want to publish names of who they consider to be "extreme" Muslims/Muslim groups as part of their attempt to refocus Prevent on Muslims & not the far right

This is after a far-right terror attack against a migrant centre

Thread
ICYMI Shawcross said "..Islam is one of the greatest, most terrifying problems of our future"

He targeted Muslim charities. He defended torture. He seems to even have wanted Foreign Office officials to mock Islam

Much more - see 👇🏽
ICYMI Baroness Warsi said she was genuinely "fearful of the idea of Michael Gove becoming prime minister" due to "his views on British Muslims"

Gove promoted Douglas Murray, pushed the Trojan Horse story & was a fan of people like Maajid Nawaz

For more👇🏽
Read 12 tweets
Dec 26, 2022
Hundreds of thousands of people have seen this far-right Islamophobic conspiracy theory on GB News go unchallenged

It is appalling, unacceptable & downright dangerous

One has to wonder where @KeithPrinceAM & so many others with such views get their news from...scary
Whilst @KeithPrinceAM has now apologised and a few thousand have seen the apology, the GB News tweet with the conspiracy theory remains up with no clarifying tweet from @GBNEWS.

It'd almost as if they want the conspiracy theory to be shared. Image
Does anyone know if they apologised on-air and just didn't clip it up?
Read 4 tweets
Aug 20, 2022
Many are heaping praise on Michael Gove today, but few (in their praise) seem to even mention his "crazy" anti-Muslim views & policy positions (see link below)

Why?

Because views about Muslims seem to be irrelevant to many commentators.

independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Few seem to care that the first Muslim woman to serve in Cabinet and former Chair of the Party (who knew Gove well) was genuinely "fearful of the idea of Michael Gove becoming prime minister" because of "his views on British Muslims"

theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
It seems some of these hostile views are because he falsely believed that most Muslims hold "rejectionist Islamist views" in his famous Celsius 7/7

Why do I say falsely?

Because the basis was 2 polls that were insufficient to reach that conclusion.

theguardian.com/politics/2014/…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(