This is outrageous. The idea of having to condemn the actions of those you have nothing to do with, is unacceptable in general & even more so, for young children
It is important children learn that they aren't responsible for the actions of others, and have no duty to condemn
2. The choice to exclude Islamophobia from the guidance (noting government line that it is not a type of racism so is not included *at all*) not only speaks to the way the gvt prioritises the racism that suits it politically
It also speaks to how Islamophobia is totally ignored
3. The government is considering an "extreme position" to be accusations against the state (eg. Islamophobia is an institutional problem in the governing Party & in the policies it enacts?) which they determine to be "unsubstantiated"
Who will be the arbiter of this? Astonishing
4. The idea that promoting "divisive or victim narratives" is an extreme position if it is "harmful to British society" is astonishing.
Who decides if calling out the Islamophobia in our society falls under this? Is it Islamophobic groups that have influence at the top of gvt?
On my first tweet in this thread, the reason why I state that this affects children, is because it calls failure to condemn an "extreme political stance" objectively.
What is the consequence of that for (all?) children who do not want to be deemed to have an "extreme" stance?
We have to be honest about what this is doing - it is imposing the government's political narrative (which is seen to ignore Muslims if not being actively against Muslims) on its guidance for schools.
It's unacceptable
And whilst some may claim that it is not biased etc., let's be clear.
Whilst the government's rule breaking is well established, that would never put it in scope. This is targeting others...those it doesn't like.
But it is fair to say Jake Wallis Simons has a particularly awful history during his editorship of the paper.
His attitude towards Muslims is vile.
But his defence of Douglas Murray, his attacks on ordinary protestors, his attacks on journalists, his attacks on even calling for a ceasefire, are just a small snippet of his awful views.
This protest was almost entirely peaceful with minimal arrests.
With a protest of this size, there are always a handful of idiots, but from the reporting it seems there were far less than for example at this pro-Israel rally a couple of years ago.
The idea that those exercising their democratic right to protest it show solidarity to Palestinians, are somehow an "intimidating mob" is just not okay.
After her racist smear was forcibly corrected (ht @cfmmuk), a source close to Braverman admits:
When referring to the 'grooming gangs phenomenon', she only meant high profile cases where Pakistani men were involved & not all group-based child sexual abuse bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Whilst this source calls the ruling "perverse", they are clearly wrong:
Only calling high-profile group-based child sexual abuse done by Pakistani men as "grooming gangs" is an astonishing admission, unjustifiable and incorrect
The IPSO ruling makes it clear how it is inaccurate. It is not a "political attack" - merely the correction of a false racist smear.
Outrageous the Home Secretary defends Douglas Murray as "mainstream"
She is *actively* promoting a man who said objectively racist & extreme things such as “Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board" & who has defended Tommy Robinson
Douglas Murray says London has become "foreign" because "in 23 of London's 33 boroughs "white Britons" are now in a minority" i.e. being non-white, means you are foreign and can't be British
Is the government view *really* that this is a mainstream view? @Tories4Equality
@Tories4Equality Murray said "less Islam" is a solution to terrorism (whilst talking about Muslims).
Is it *really* a government position that this is a "mainstream" view and not extreme?
Shawcross, Gove & The Times appear to want to publish names of who they consider to be "extreme" Muslims/Muslim groups as part of their attempt to refocus Prevent on Muslims & not the far right
This is after a far-right terror attack against a migrant centre
Thread
ICYMI Shawcross said "..Islam is one of the greatest, most terrifying problems of our future"
He targeted Muslim charities. He defended torture. He seems to even have wanted Foreign Office officials to mock Islam
Whilst @KeithPrinceAM has now apologised and a few thousand have seen the apology, the GB News tweet with the conspiracy theory remains up with no clarifying tweet from @GBNEWS.
It'd almost as if they want the conspiracy theory to be shared.
Does anyone know if they apologised on-air and just didn't clip it up?