I think it would be interesting to study, if SCOTUS overturns Roe and Casey, how many states have already declared fetuses to be persons, which would make abortion, or travel to get abortion, murder, with no statute of limitations.
Also interesting would be whether a law that is on the books, but unenforceable, may be applied retroactively if that law is declared constitutional.
If I were looking to point out the problems with forcing women to give birth, I think the purely discretionary enforcement of laws carrying mandatory life sentences would be a good thing to focus on.
I think I can acknowledge that ACB is a brilliant woman and a potentially great justice and also that the end of the right to privacy under the 9th would be a nightmare.
And I would propose that this is a more fruitful line of attack than showing women in little red outfits.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1938, a Polish Jew living in Paris, Herschel Feibel Grynszpan, learned that his family had been arrested and deported.
He entered the German embassy, claiming to be a spy with valuable information, and shot an embassy official, Ernst vom Rath.
The Germans, of course, claimed that this was an enormous outrage--just part of the historical plot of the Jews to destroy the Aryan race.
They planned a series of pogroms in response, to be carried out by government agents out of uniform, encouraging the public to join in.
Initially, he was to be tried in Paris. Once war began between Germany and France, the lawyer asked for an immediate trial, figuring that an acquittal was likely. But as the German army approached, Grynszpan escaped.
In The Florida Star v. B. J. F, 491 U.S. 524, 526 (1989), a rape victim sued a newspaper for printing her name, arguing that it violated a Florida law protecting her privacy.
Even though the name of a rape victim is substantially less newsworthy than the name of a public official, the Supreme Court of the United States said that publishing that name was protected by the First Amendment.
When you say we don't have "jurisdiction" over them you have to come up with some tortured definition where if you can imagine a law does not apply to illegal immigrants (or people here on a visa), that means no jurisidiction.
But one problem with that is that children are also exempt from many laws, adult criminal responsibility, the draft, etcetera, and yet no one would argue that they aren't subject to American jurisdiction.