I also read these key citations below on T cell immunity
2/11
How can a prominent immunologist not consider this early body of research? So I thought about potential roadblocks to accepting new data... a process called anchoring bias
This is a bias that’s created when you commit to an outcome & don’t assimilate new info as it arises
3/11
initially I was accepting of lockdown but as evidence presented itself I changed my tune... specifically I started to change my tune after no uptick in NYC after 2 weeks of Floyd protests
4/11
I became even more questioning after we understood what exactly happened with the fraud regarding surgisphere which lead to several retractions from major journals and the errors in dosage admitted by principal investigator regarding the recovery trial dosage of HCQ...
5/11
I became even more questioning then even moreso after successive data on immunity that I recently reviewed.
5/11
after all of this I really started to question the public health messaging. We all thought Sweden was crazy initially... but we have to admit now when Denmark, Norway, Finland and all of Europe is having cases go up while Sweden is flat ... maybe they got it right
🤔
6/11
it's okay to be wrong and change - I admit I was wrong. Initially I was scared and supported lockdown and have now changed tune - but many things prevent accepting new data and being wrong - namely ANCHORING BIAS
7/11
Another issue that’s keeping people from accepting new data besides anchoring bias is hyperbole.
People may hear me say I’m against lockdowns, but they believe it means something else
8/11
I support protected our immune-compromised, elderly
Anyone should be able to wear a mask in close proximity indoor environments
Anyone should take common sense precautions of distancing in indoor environments
We should have access to PPE for healthcare workers
9/11
The main issue for me is that I now believe that lockdowns were likely not helpful and I admit I was wrong before... I pray that I’m not wrong again but so far this is where my re-evaluation has brought me
10/11
While for me it may be easy to admit I was wrong
It may be much harder for politicians during an election year
11/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While very few physicians have embraced it yet, our practice has been thriving on the use of remotely monitoring patient biometric data. In our clinic, almost all of our patients have smart equipment in their homes which wirelessly sync with our practice.
We monitor body weight, fat mass, water weight, muscle mass, blood pressure, heart rate/heart rate regularity, and blood sugar—all remotely. The patient can remain in the comfort of their own home and data is securely submitted wirelessly to our practice in real-time. This data is analyzed by me and my staff, which we then use to help encourage our patients who are doing well in their journeys. It has also helped us to identify patterns that predict weight regain and has given our practice the unique ability to reach out to our patients in real-time to intervene, increase contact, and lend a helping hand when times are tough. In our practice, gone are the days when you would see your physician six months later, after regaining 30 pounds. @gotowardhealth
I have a serious problem with the term “pre-diabetes.”
The prefix “pre” is used to describe what comes before something.
In reality, “pre”-diabetes is actually AFTER or “post” 15 years of the high insulin levels & inflammation associated with the modern lifestyle.
Prediabetes is usually diagnosed by checking an a1c level, which is the percentage of hemoglobin that binds to sugar as a percentage of normal hemoglobin.
If you a1c is between 5.7 and 6.4, you are considered to have “pre-diabetes”
To achieve this level of pre-diabetes, you must sustain enough carbohydrate/glycemic excursions & weight gain where your average glucose rises sufficiently above normal levels.
The a1c describes your speed, your are past your speed limit.
Defund the American Academy of Pediatrics.
It’s not a neutral medical body… it’s a corporate mouthpiece. Here’s the proof 🧵
💊 Big Pharma
AAP takes money from pharma giants.
Their guidelines? Push GLP-1 injections and bariatric surgery for kids… but demonize reducing carbs and sugar. Profit over prevention.
🥤 Junk Food Industry
AAP is bankrolled by Coca-Cola, Nestlé, PepsiCo, and formula makers.
The result? Silence on ultra-processed foods… but endless focus on drugs and surgery.
After helping thousands of patients lose weight, here’s my advice for those looking for lifelong, sustainable life changes. These are the “5 MUSTS” anyone trying to lose weight lifelong NEEDS to do.
🧵/Thread
Before you understand my “5 musts”, simply ask yourself -what are the side effects of your prior weight loss attempts- NOT your reasons, NOT what you want to happen, what went wrong, what made you stop?
The 5 Musts: #1 HUNGER
Most people quit diets because they feel low energy, tired & hungry. Your weight loss attempt will need to manage HUNGER. Are food choices making you full, or are they leaving you craving more a couple of hours later? Stick to:: 🐠🥩🍳🍗🍖🍤🫑🥑🥬🥦