Thread: The ideological debate over whether ‘transwomen are women’ is never a useful starting point for policy makers when it comes to deciding what to do about their female-only spaces and services. /1
Society’s growing awareness and tolerance of an individuals right to self-express their own gender identity is welcome, but it cannot simply be extrapolated into all policy areas. /2
Not when the reason for a women-only policy is *because* of differences between the male and female sex. This is particularly true in sports policy making. /3
Fortunately, policy makers do not need to decide if they believe “transwomen are women” or not. /4
It’s perfectly possible to respect a trans persons gender identity AND to accept that transwoman were born male and that their body will have benefited from male puberty. /5
Agreeing that a person born male can self-identify as a woman does not mean you must also agree that this person should also have access to female-only spaces. /5
Unfortunately, discussions relating to women and the transgender community are so often framed by the simplistic mantra ‘transwomen are women’ delaying the final policy decision. /6
Conflating and muddling up the two very different concepts of gender identity and sex is common place. Swiftly followed by accusations of transphobia if anyone acknowledges the difference. /7
This is a dead-end that policy makers would do best to steer clear of. Despite World Rugby’s valiant efforts to uphold evidence-based policy making for transgender eligibility in the female game it has predictably hit the inevitable ‘transwomen are women’ obstacle. /8
The same obstacle that tripped up policy makers before them on women’s prison policy, women’s rape centres, women’s only changing rooms and more. /9
Rigorous and high quality scientific and legal discussions about player welfare, competitive fairness and participation levels seemingly undermined with the gotcha that ‘transwomen are women!’ /10
But the reality is different. Having a policy on transgender eligibility in female sporting competition passes no judgement on the validity or lived experience of a transgender person’s gender identity. /11
Agreeing to exclude transwomen from women’s Rugby for reasons of fairness and safety doesn’t mean you think their gender identity isn’t important. /12
It simply acknowledges something we all know. Sex matters too.
Sometimes we have no choice but to prioritise it if we want a policy to deliver on its purpose.
The ONS messed up the gender identity question in the Census leading the data to be downgraded from official stats. New work is ongoing to create a harmonised standard approach across government. /2
In the meantime the interim guidance says you must stick a health warning on any data generated using the Census-type question because some people don’t understand what ‘gender identity’ means so data quality is poor. /3
We asked whether they plan to remove Germany from the list of approved countries for the overseas route of gender recognition after the German Self-Determination Act comes into force on 1 November.
They said GR systems in other countries "constantly change" and it would update the "list annually".
/2
They ignored our key question about whether German applicants could now get a UK GRC without supplying medical reports. Just a copy and paste answer about annual updates /3
Breaking News: Census data on trans population downgraded by Stats Regulator. /1
“We consider that there is sufficient evidence that the gender identity question in the census has underperformed, with some groups of people being more likely than others to misunderstand the question.”
Analysis by Professor Michael Biggs showed flaws in the data triggering this investigation. Public struggled to understand a complicated question about gender identities matching sex registered at birth. Result was lots of people saying they are trans by mistake and inflating the figures /2
The ONS team in charge of designing the Census were captured by gender ideologues. Basic questionnaire design principles abandoned in favour of ideological language and motives. /3
The office of the Taiwanese ambassador, Vincent Yao, contacted us on Tuesday to express their “gravest concern” that we had chosen to “verbally attack a biological female” and asked that we “put an end to the act of spreading disinformation and harmful comments.” /3
Semi-final starts soon. Follow this thread for live updates. /1
Suwannapheng is a phenomenal female boxer. Silver medalist in World Championships last year. Will her female talent be enough to overcome the male sex advantage of her opponent? /2
“The lawyers advised to monitor the situation and to contact the IOC. IBA informed the IOC representatives about these tests, but no reaction followed from the IOC side.” /2
“At the next IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships 2023 in New Delhi, Khelif and Lin were tested following their consent again before their first fights. Blood sample collection was made on 17 March 2023. The findings were absolutely identical to the first test results.” /3