JFC see MY THREAD (linked below) which lays it all out (but highlights posted here just for you)
Even when I post t/links & content you WM/WW cant even manage to use them. You just wanna spew nonsense b/c you cant deal w/reality! (It seems like Donny, 1/
https://twitter.com/kateneuropsych/status/1310037297094688768?s=09
Even when I post t/links & content you WM/WW cant even manage to use them. You just wanna spew nonsense b/c you cant deal w/reality! (It seems like Donny, 1/
https://twitter.com/Melissaspindle3/status/1310230280343629824
someone did your homework for you too) WELL HERES A NEWS FLASH:
A) FROM CORNELL'S VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY law.cornell.edu/wex/recuse#:~:….
RECUSE
Judges recuse themselves when they take no part in deciding cases that they would otherwise help decide. The Due Process clauses of the 2/
A) FROM CORNELL'S VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY law.cornell.edu/wex/recuse#:~:….
RECUSE
Judges recuse themselves when they take no part in deciding cases that they would otherwise help decide. The Due Process clauses of the 2/
United States Constitution requires judges to recuse themselves from cases in two situations:
cases in two situations:
1) Where the judge has a financial interest in the case's outcome.
2) Where there is otherwise a strong possibility that the judge's decision will 3/
cases in two situations:
1) Where the judge has a financial interest in the case's outcome.
2) Where there is otherwise a strong possibility that the judge's decision will 3/
be biased (Let that sink in!).
In either case, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT THE JUDGE IS ACTUALLY BIASED. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT EVEN IF THE JUDGE IS NOT BIASED, THE HIGH PROBABILITY OF BIAS STILL DAMAGES THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM. ANY PARTY IN A LAWSUIT MAY 4/
In either case, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT THE JUDGE IS ACTUALLY BIASED. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT EVEN IF THE JUDGE IS NOT BIASED, THE HIGH PROBABILITY OF BIAS STILL DAMAGES THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM. ANY PARTY IN A LAWSUIT MAY 4/
REQUEST THAT A JUDGE RECUSE HIM OR HERSELF (And let this sink in).
The Supreme Court addressed recusal in the 2009 case Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co. (08-22). In that case, one party requested that a judge recuse himself because the other party's CEO spent over 5/
The Supreme Court addressed recusal in the 2009 case Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co. (08-22). In that case, one party requested that a judge recuse himself because the other party's CEO spent over 5/
$3 million getting the judge elected. Even though the Supreme Court found that there was no evidence that the judge was biased, it still held that he had to recuse himself. For additional information on this case, see the LII's 6/
oral argument preview of it (And again, let that sink in).
And heres 4 more links (see below) to covering Cornell's virtual law library, US law codes, case law, ABA ethical requiments, law articles etc
(WARNING: You'll need a coupla boxes of snowflake brand Kleenex 7/
And heres 4 more links (see below) to covering Cornell's virtual law library, US law codes, case law, ABA ethical requiments, law articles etc
(WARNING: You'll need a coupla boxes of snowflake brand Kleenex 7/
because it would seem you've no ability to deal when reality doesn't agree with you)
8/
END
law.cornell.edu/wex/recuse#:~:….
abajournal.com/web/article/ju…
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28…
americanbar.org/groups/profess…
8/
END
law.cornell.edu/wex/recuse#:~:….
abajournal.com/web/article/ju…
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28…
americanbar.org/groups/profess…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
