Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Sep 28, 2020 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Okay, this is hilarious! Peter Strzok's attorney is telling Judge Sullivan that @SidneyPowell1 is violating a court order by filing these additional disclosures. 1/
2/ NOPE! The court order was to not file supplements to "pending motions," which were motions to withdraw and motion for dismissal b/c of prosecutorial misconduct. The government's motion to dismiss was not filed until later! And even Sullivan wouldn't dare say you can't file
3/ relevant evidence to that motion. But what makes it even richer?
4/ Strzok knew of the Sullivan's standing order to turn over evidence and also that if there was a debate on materiality, it had to be presented to Judge Sullivan. But did Strzok's attorney send a note to Sullivan saying "hey, you should know we didn't think he was lying" and
5/5 "we're concerned that Van Quack hasn't turned over the documents that confirm that." UNREAL!
OMgosh...post-script: Strzok's attorney calls the documents "Brady production." Ummm, nothing like admitting government violated the standing order!!!!
And I have no idea how the dates were added, but assume someone was taking notes and accidently copied wrong document, was it Jensen's team, or Powell's (if true),but really, maybe Sullivan should look at the "mistake" made by the Special Counsel's office: thefederalist.com/2020/06/01/new…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Feb 4
THREADETTE: Today's @SpecialReport w/ @BretBaier included interview of Canada's UN Ambassador Bob Rae. While Rae claimed tariff was only harmful, Bret countered administration saw "movement today with Mexico and Canada promising a lot that they weren't promising before.” 1/
2/ "Not true," Rae responded claiming Trudeau had already committed to those expenditures. Now, it wouldn't surprise me if Trump had already gotten some of those same commitments, I did some searching and couldn't find the supposed announcements Rae noted. Image
3/ So crowd-sourcing: What had Trudeau already committed to versus what was announced? Either way, Rae was unwise to contradict Trudeau & Trump's message of working together to solve problem, since there is still much to resolve.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: D.C. District Court issues TRO barring freeze of grants, again with crazy reasoning that OMB Directive in effect, remains in effect. 1/ Image
2/ WHILE judge is correct voluntary cessation is an exception to mootness, the problem here is that there is no basis to say Trump will enact same broad policy and in fact, freeze is based on EO--so those should have been the issue for Court. Image
3/ The Court ignores it was the EO's which prompted freezes and that no challenge was made in complaint to EO. Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 3
🧵on U.S. dispute w/ Canada: It seems there are several under radar conflicts w/ Canada public is unaware of, i.e., fentanyl, limits U.S. banks, or issue I'm currently digging into, Boundary Waters Treaty, which governs how U.S. & Canada share waters along its 5,500 border. 1/
2/ That is both longest border shared by two countries in world, but 45% of border is water. The BWT created International Joint Commission which is charged w/ resolving or preventing conflict b/w U.S. & Canada re shared water.
3/ One huge success since adoption of BWT is vast imp. in water quality of Great Lakes. But in areas w/ shared borders, where water flows into CA, U.S. taxpayers pay cost. But where CA water flows to U.S., CA won't abide by BWT or pay $ to protect U.S. from population from CA.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
🚨🚨🚨Federal judge (Obama-appointee) enters TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) over Trump Administration's freeze of federal spending. 1/
2/ Full opinion. Analysis following. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ This introductory paragraph exposes the Court's activism: A Court doesn't issue a TRO based on undefined "pauses" where complaint was specific--it challenged OMB Directive which is no more. Image
Read 15 tweets
Jan 31
No idea what Biden Administration did to implement DEI, but this lawsuit and other filings show how Obama threw standards out the window. 1/
2/ Here's complaint. Long but details what happened under Obama. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Here's order denying FAA's Motion to Dismiss. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 10 tweets
Jan 30
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump Administration files Motion to Dismiss lawsuit filed in D.C. District Court seeking a TRO of spending freezes. 1/
2/ This earlier 🧵provides background to this lawsuit (brought by various associations of non-profits) and the one brought in Rhode Island by Blue States.
3/ I bought and uploaded to Courtlistern filings. Here's Motion to Dismiss.storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(