2. On its face the OIG release outlines a review and finding, actually a warning, by Horowitz’s office about FBI contractor access to “a certain national security database.”
3. The release is titled: “Management Advisory: Notification of Concerns Identified in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Contract Administration of a Certain Classified National Security Program”.
4. On the surface of the current release the OIG is noting concerns and a warning shared with the FBI about ongoing contractor access to the NSA database; thus, a “classified national security program” becomes defined.
It's the bulk metadata NSA database.
5. However, in the background of this current release it appears the OIG is using this public notification as a CYA of sorts. Meaning the OIG is saying publicly they have advised the FBI of “concerns” with this database being abused.
6. Indeed, we know the OIG was reviewing FBI contractor access to the NSA database as a result of both FISA judge Rosemary Collyer and FISA judge James Boasberg reports.
7. It was little discussed on January 19, 2019, when the OIG revealed “Misconduct by Two Current Senior FBI Officials and One Retired FBI Official While Providing Oversight on an FBI Contract.”
8. As specifically, and in my opinion *intentionally* noted by the OIG, the FBI used their intelligence authority to “classify” their response to IG Horowitz warning; and now Horowitz is informing the public of that opaque FBI approach.
9. Essentially, this can be looked at as Horowitz calling out the FBI for hiding information, yet the IG is using carefully worded public information to do so.
10. The FBI hid their response to the IG warning behind the cloud of “classification”, leaving the IG with no alternative except to say the classified response (March 2020) has to be accepted as the final FBI response to the IG warning.
11. Horowitz: […] "The classification marking of the working draft report ... have contributed to the delays in finalizing this review."
12. Horowitz: "So that we can begin the process of resolving issues that we identified during the review ... we have determined that it would be in the OIG’s and the FBI’s interests to conclude our review by treating the OIG’s working draft report ... as a management advisory."
13. Horowitz: "Further, based on the oral and written feedback previously provided by the FBI on the working draft report, we consider the 11 recommendations contained within the working draft report to be final and their status “resolved.”
14. The IG is then saying to the FBI you have 90 days to tell us what you did to address the contractor access abuses.
15. Keep in mind this contractor access to the bulk NSA metadata is a big deal. All of the FISA audits in the past six years have pointed out FBI contractors abuse their access to the database and unlawfully extract information without following fourth amendment protections.
16. The scale of the abuse is actually stunning; and now the OIG has reviewed the same FBI process and found the same issues uncorrected.
The FBI is attempting to retain an unlawful process.
17. The valid purpose of the NSA database has been exploited to: (1) gain opposition research on political entities; AND (2) the NSA database is being exploited to retrieve information useful for financial gains (insider information).
18. The FBI contractors inside the network are in the business of selling information which they obtain from their access to the NSA database.
Horowitz and FISC says it needs to stop.
Wray says notsomuch.
19. Everyone inside the system is compromised by the extracted data. We can only imagine the blackmail material floating around DC in the hands of those who weaponize it and refuse to relinquish power.
FUBAR !
20. This database is the source, the root source, of all things currently happening in/around politics.
Whoever controls it, controls EVERYTHING !
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment and Joint Analysis Report were fabricated USIC intel in order to frame Donald Trump, then the JAR/ICA that led to the expulsion of 35 Russian assets was also a fabrication.
2) Using the Durham report, even the Wall Street journal said, […] “All of this suggests that the Mueller probe was as much a cover-up as an attempt to find evidence of collusion.”...
3) Yes. If the ICA/JAR were manipulated evidence (they were), and John Durham confirmed the Robert Mueller Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based on fraud (it was), then what does that say about the status of things?
2) Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.
Pay super close attention. This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner. This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.
Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.
3) We already pieced this together 7 years ago.
Grassley needs to overlay the Strzok/Page text messages to the OIG report and the newly released "Clinton Annex."
SSCI Chairman Cotton is assembling his weapons right now, he has no choice - Cotton accepted the role. Tom Cotton is the "hand" of the Intelligence Community.
2) It's going to be bloody, brutal, vicious and one of the most consequential counter attacks in modern political history that few Americans will appreciate.
It's way over there.... on the beach.... far from view... far away from the crowd.... and it's going to be ugly.
3) She's doing this. But few, very few can actually see and understand what Tulsi is doing. I wrote the roadmap possibilities a year ago.
Compare what you see now, to this 👇. You will understand.
1) You guys know the background. You know the context. You know the history. You know all the nuances and Machiavellian manipulations that have brought us to this very specific moment.
2) Now, you are President Donald Trump and you are in a conversation with Vladimir Putin; a geopolitical ‘adversary’ whose current status was created by the same intelligence system operators that created your defined ‘enemy’ status within your own country. You and Putin were both targeted by the same intelligence system, the CIA.
3) Vladimir Putin does not view Americans as his enemy. Vladimir Putin views the CIA as his enemy.
President Putin is essentially ambivalent to your targeted position, but defines his adversary as your Central Intelligence Agency.
You want to cut the Gordian knot, change the geopolitical world, create a strategic alignment; but to do that you need Putin to accept you do not view him as the enemy. You also need to prove you have control over the apparatus he views as a threat.
How do you prove you have control over the agency?
♦ chased down intelligence community leakers,
♦ released the JFK files,
♦ released Joe Biden’s domestic terrorism surveillance plan,
♦ intercepted an NIC plot to impeach President Trump (confirmed by Rubio),
♦ taken control of the Presidential Daily Briefing,
♦ and more recently begun to confront the weaponized corruption within the IC Inspector General organization.
These are actions, not words, and those actions speak boldly. Suffice to say, her effectiveness has placed a target on her back.