An important question is what vaccines to take if you have a choice. Prof. Florian Krammer did an excellent review of major vaccines that are likely to be available soon here.
Pfizer mRNA (two doses) likely to be available sooner than other vaccine candidate (other than Moderna).
Novavax induces really high antibody response (so could be very good booster shot in a year).
most of the 1st-gen vaccines will lack mucosol immunity, meaning they will not block the spread nor infection. they will make COVID19 into a mild cold.
seniors (65+ yo) will benefit most from the vaccines, and fortunately appear to suffer the least amount of side effects.
but they also have the weakest response. so booster shots may be needed sooner than younger folks.
astrazeneca vaccine is probably good only for a single-two-dose use, because one would develop immunity to the adenovirus, making it less useful to used repeatedly as booster shots.
This is especially important for senior folks.
for the US, both Moderna and Pfizer vaccines absolutely need two doses to generate protective immunity.. and their need for expensive dry-ice storage/transportation potentially make them too expensive in the long run, i.e. beyond the initial wave of vaccination.
Long-term needs for COVID-19 booster shots in the next 5 years are probably best met by recombinant protein vaccines, like Novavax.
provided no unexpected hiccups in their clinical trial, $NVAX has the best prospect of long-term upside , given current available data.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The new Bank Term Funding Program is likely to expand Fed's balance sheet by $100-200Bn in short order. This is effectively a one-shot QE program that will be wound down in one year.
This sudden injection of liquidity is likely to be very positive for stonks in the short term.
And its addition will make the trajectory of QT very interesting in the next few weeks. Most likely QT will continue, and the Fed could potentially continue to hike rates after the market stabilizes.
The next 3 months will be very interesting/volatile (unprecedented) in how Fed liquidity evolves over time.
Fed is going to meet on Monday 1130am to decide on any emergency measure on their discount window (emergency lending facility to commercial banks) federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/bo…
They probably need to do a little more than just tweaking the discount window, since $SIVB collapse is getting close to the scale of Bear Stearns, when it collapsed during the week of March 14 2008.
When BSC collapsed, it had $11Bn of equity supporting $395Bn in assets.
At the close on March 9th, $SIVB had $6.2Bn of equity (reduced to $2.3Bn at the open of March 10th) supporting $216Bn in assets, with total client funds at $341.5Bn. The leverage ratio was getting so bad that FDIC stepped in.
Covid lockdown in Shanghai is going into its 5th week, but the case count is still climbing almost exponentially.
Chinese vaccines are working (icu admission and death numbers near 0), but it has also made early detection extremely hard.
Political rhetoric is starting to get in the way for the government to accurately identify and rectify what has NOT been working in this covid wave in Shanghai.
Lockdown is likely to continue for another 2-3 weeks.
Barring a miracle scenario in which omicron magically disappears in Shanghai, some major shift in chinese covid strategy could happen in the next 3 to 4 weeks.
But before that, we will see continued deteration in chinese domestic supply chain which will take months to sort out
1. a 3-month period to ramp up from 0 to $60Bn/m UST+$35Bn/m MBS.
2. monthly MBS roll-off will be less than $35Bn very soon. (only $38Bn when 30Y rate was still <5%) So we may never hit the MBS monthly cap any way. So a 2nd shoe will drop when the Fed releases the plan of MBS sales in Sept/Oct?
3. At a pace of $60Bn/m, QT should be tapering off around Q3 2023, when maturing UST starts to fall below the monthly cap.
An example to illustrate the extent of real-estate overweighting for a typical Chinese city resident, and why Chinese government is trying to pull off a soft-landing for their property market:
some random 30yo in Shanghai whined about her "poor" life on Sept 5,2021.
The rough translation: her family owns 5 condos in Shanghai: 4 paid off, 1 with a mortgage. her parents live in 2, and 3 are rented out to pay for the mortgage. Her husband's family owns 3 condos in Shanghai, all paid off.
8 properties are worth ¥100MM in total
they live in 1 of her husband's properties. husband's parents live in another one and the third one is a rental property.
wife and husband are both the only child in their family. that's why she considers her parents' properties hers.
1/ Evergrande "crisis": a controlled demolition of a toxic asset producer.
would there be contagion or not? probably not
2/ What is evergrande? It's a highly leveraged property developer, that also moonlights as a commercial bank (Shengjing Bank), a private equity firm running a bunch of fake buzzword companies, and a quasi-investment bank issuing wealth-management products.
3/ All the protests and headline problems that we heard last week is the default of its quasi-investment bank arm, whose liability is only *2%* of the overall liability of the conglomerate.