Basically the TRE group had more weight loss and fat loss although it wasn’t statistically significant.
Interesting on DXA it appears that there was a statistically significant reduction in lean mass.
Where did this come from?
Do we think that eating 12-16 hours of the standard diet would lead to significantly more lean mass than 8 hours?
It doesn’t seem likely.
So where did it come from?
The answers may be in the supplemental.
EXERCISE:
The late TRF group had decreased activity, daily movement, METS, steps, high activity, training frequency and training volume
The TRF group exercised less! Much less!
SLEEP:
They also had worsened sleep timing/efficiency & more awake time
This could be an issue with meal timing close to sleep. eTRF versus lateTRF
But overall it seems sleep was significantly affected.
Lastly the DEXA measurements seem inconsistent
Do we think that TRF increases HEAD size ?
Or preferentially decreases left arm lean mass but not right?
I’m hoping to get the BIA data to see if that corroborates findings.
BOTTOM LINE:
This trial has given me pause, much to think about... for now, the only practice we will put into place is focusing on sleep quality, exercise and emphasize protein.
Certainly this study was well done and got me thinking. Kudos to the scientists!
For now: eTRF
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After helping thousands of patients lose weight, here’s my advice for those looking for lifelong, sustainable life changes. These are the “5 MUSTS” anyone trying to lose weight lifelong NEEDS to do.
🧵/Thread
Before you understand my “5 musts”, simply ask yourself -what are the side effects of your prior weight loss attempts- NOT your reasons, NOT what you want to happen, what went wrong, what made you stop?
The 5 Musts: #1 HUNGER
Most people quit diets because they feel low energy, tired & hungry. Your weight loss attempt will need to manage HUNGER. Are food choices making you full, or are they leaving you craving more a couple of hours later? Stick to:: 🐠🥩🍳🍗🍖🍤🫑🥑🥬🥦
Summary:
Poorly calculated
Don’t quantify hormonal effects on appetite
Labels/Tracking don’t effect intake
Worse outcomes vs. dieting
Follow along with this fully cited thread 1/n
We have known as far back as 1982 that tracking calories, food logging is inaccurate & doesn’t predict weight loss
10.1093/ajcn/35.4.727
Meta-analysis in 2008 by Harnack and French, then follow-up in 2014 from Eblel, Kiszko reviews and assesses the evidence on the effectiveness of calorie labeling at the point of purchase
"Concerns on the effectiveness of calorie labeling policies"
I have a serious problem with the term “pre-diabetes.”
The prefix “pre” is used to describe what comes before something.
In reality, “pre”-diabetes is actually AFTER or “post” 15 years of the high insulin levels & inflammation associated with the modern lifestyle.
Prediabetes is usually diagnosed by checking an a1c level, which is the percentage of hemoglobin that binds to sugar as a percentage of normal hemoglobin.
If you a1c is between 5.7 and 6.4, you are considered to have “pre-diabetes”
To achieve this level of pre-diabetes, you must sustain enough carbohydrate/glycemic excursions & weight gain where your average glucose rises sufficiently above normal levels.
The a1c describes your speed, your are past your speed limit.
How statisticians and researchers arrived at the conclusion that the BlueZones are a FRAUD. 🤔
🔑 Thread with key excerpts
1/n
“When these states transition to state-wide birth registration, the number of supercentenarians falls by 80% per year“
2/n
“The US data support the hypothesis that improved vital registration should reduce the number of supercentenarians, and be associated with changing patterns of old-age survival, by reducing age-coding error rates.”
3/n
How I approached high LDL in my patients, and how we observed a DECREASE in LDL of 480mg/dl !!!!
About my published case-series of 5 patients and clinical experience with thousands of patients …
(1/20)
As data supporting low carb diets has proliferated for weight loss, diabetes, seizures, mental health and other conditions, patients are now presenting with various issues related to the diet
2/20
For example, while it’s true that consistently a1c, triglycerides, HDL and lpa seem to improve, some patients report some adverse events.