Antonin Scalia voted to block millions of families from accessing healthcare and therefore hated his 9 kids, I guess
And again, we're not guessing here! Barrett has said very explicitly that Sibelius was incorrectly decided in her fawning review of a book arguing that pretty much the entire 20th century regulatory and welfare state is unconstitutional! scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewconten…
The central Republican argument in all confirmation hearings of Republican Supreme Court nominees is that describing the stated views of the justices and the explicit goals of the conservative legal community is a vile slander
Republicans are imagining confirmation hearings focused on Barrett's faith because they understand perfectly well that the public would be horrified if they had any idea what she's being put on the Court to do, which is why Dems need to be laser focused on the ACA.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can we please cut this shit out. "I also don't like certain things about how the DHS operates, so when RFK SHAKES THINGS UP maybe he will do it in a sensible manner I approve of" is the kind of delusional thinking that leads you to President Donald J. Trump in the first place
"When Biden said he would end the war in Afghanistan, he actually meant that he would end all military conflict in the world forever" isn't even goalpost moving, it's like saying the Florida Panthers promised to win the Stanley Cup but are losers because the Marlins are 43-73
Sorry, the scale of drone warfare -- by far the most important metric in determining the hawkishness of a president 10 years ago -- by random coincidence permanently ceased to be a meaningful variable on January 21, 2017. I don't make the rules
"James Comey was in the tank for Hillary Clinton" ROFL. Glenn really should reconsider the "tweeting about dogs in Portuguese" approach to days when something bad happens for his political side
One point to add is that it was incredibly stupid of Comey to think his statement would help clarify why Clinton wasn't indicted (i.e. because nobody ever has been for comparable conduct.) Inevitably, the only message people got was "extremely careless" lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/how-ar…
As Patrick Deneen is making the rounds with a new book generating credulous coverage for claims that "post-liberal" reactionaries are actually more egalitarian than liberals, keep this in mind:
The Biden administration is enacting exactly the kind of pro-labor, pro-domestic manufacturing, pro-environmental industrial policy Deneen and his allies claim to want, and they don't care at all: lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/the-re…
Instead, Deneen's actual friends and allies are all politicians who supported Trump's upper-class tax cuts and Trump's efforts to take healthcare away from tens of millions of people to pay for even more upper-class tax cuts: politico.com/news/magazine/…
It’s worth noting that the only reason Trump is the first former president to be indicted is that Gerald Ford unwisely preempted them lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/its-th…
Ford's pardon was very unpopular -- indeed, it probably cost him re-election -- and should not be seen as establishing some kind of American constitutional tradition that former presidents should be above the law.
Plainly, Alabama should never have panicked and brought in Vladimir Myshkin to start the second period
Meanwhile, in dissent Alito offers the “Martin Luther King’s entire career consisted of one speech which consisted of one sentence” school of statutory interpretation