So this might confuse a few people...but as a remainer I confidently predict there'll be no "7 000 lorry parks in Kent" or "40km tailbacks" to enter the County's ports as suggested in the media.
Why am I so confident in this prediction?
Simple.
"Market forces".
A short thread.
1st point - "low margin exports"
Imagine you're a solid but low tech business. You have no "niche advantage" & compete on price & delivery. Your margin for exports is enough to make a profit but thats it. Higher delivery times, costs wipe this out.
Result?
You stop exporting.
2nd point - "animal/perishable exports/imports"
If there arent enough vets/checks on these sensitive goods EITHER SIDE of UK-EU border come 1st Jan then trade in these will decline thru cost & "time sensitive" factors.
Even if there are - the increased costs will reduce demand.
This is further increased by fact that Tariffs are highest on farming produce.
If there's no deal then things like UK lamb immediately become far more expensive for EUers - as lamb farming is low margin at the best of times the result will be to simply make exporting pointless.
3rd point - "single market supply chains"
Without boring people - exporting is more profitable if you dont just compete on price. Time, regulation, inertia all play a role.
As EU a large, diverse single market this encourages business to focus on a complete single market.
4th point . "Uncertainty avoidance"
As business dont know just how bad things will be come 1st Jan they will do several things:
1. Stock up prior to 1st Jan 2. Delay trade till situation clearer 3. Prioritise "important" trade over merely "useful"
5th point - "logistics"
UK hauliers simply now dont have access to EU after 1st Jan in enough numbers.
Can this be mitigated completely & fast?
No.
Even if theoretically possible - it would cost more than now.
It also create disincentive to trade with UK as it "europeanises".
6th point - "Business lobbies"
For various reasons large retailers & drug companies are strong politically in UK. These are also crucial & sensitive imports.
The govt will thus prioritise this trade.
Result?
Other industries aware of this will have less influence/access.
7th point - "Trade accelerator effect"
For many reasons, exports stimulate imports & vice versa.
Even for simple reasons like goods containers going to a country increases incentive/supply for use for export from the country.
Thus a decrease in one...feeds a decrease in other.
So what happens to UK?
On 1st Jan EU-UK trade hugely reduced but govt will prioritise 2 types of goods: food & medecine to be traded.
Anything else cost or time sentive will be delayed, cancelled, stocked up on.
Result:
Biggest trade decline outside of war/pandemic.
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Once again some people are being very illogical about PR and the Labour party.
So ask yourself:
“what is the best way to get PR into the U.K. political system?”
The answer is of course….
The best (& only plausible) way is:
1. Labour/LibDem coalition 2. People who want PR joining the Labour Party
So if you are saying you won’t vote Labour until it’s guaranteed PR before the debate/coalition/election is sorted you’re sabotaging the only way this can be achieved.
I want PR.
Thus I want as many people who also want PR to join the Labour Party.
This shouldn’t need explaining.
Again.
It’s literally how politics works.
The LibDems are even more pro PR than labour so a coalition with them increases its lobby power.
In 10 years time people on both sides of the current “debate” are going to be very sheepish about how they turned a complex evolving subject into a nuance-fee bloodlust culture war.
Due to my family I spend 3 months of the year in an Asian country with a long history of trans people & culture.
The contrast between how this subject is treated there and in the UK is staggering.
I always think it would be beneficial for westerners who’ve now “discovered” trans issues and have gone full culture war inside weeks to spend a bit of time in Thai/Lao culture.
It’s what is called “performative nastiness” - a concept dating from 1930s.
The point is not necessarily just a bad policy but to encourage the population to “enjoy” the performative element, to encourage complicity.
Whether the policy has any practical merit isn’t important.
Students of fascism will recognize “performative nastiness” but many people won’t get it at first.
The thrill is in the “transgression”. The enjoyment of being encouraged to be complicit in what was formerly understood to be things that are “considered wrong” or “taboo”.
Priti Patel has recieved £100,000 one of the largest single donations by an oil trader - Pierre Andurand - who is not made any donations to British political parties before nor to have shown any previous interest in UK politics.
Pierre Andurand made some of his biggest profits betting on the effects of Covid-19 pandemic and predicting a world oil price slump.
He then reversed this decision prior to the Russian invasion.
Andurand has close personal ties with Russia through both his former & ex wives.
Indeed Andurand got special permission to marry his previous wife - Yevgenia Slyusarenko - in a lavish ceremony in St. Petersburg at one of Catherine I Russia’s former palaces.
Use of Lebedev family residences by Boris Johnson “much greater than previously known”.
Total time spent by the prime minister & former foreign secretary at these homes now thought to run “into months” not days.
All time spent there without security detail or sweeps.
The use of Lebedev’s multiple homes in Italy and UK supplied by the Putin-near former KGB officer Alexander Lebedev is now known to have been - contrary to earlier reports - regular events with Johnson taking the time to visit Italy alone on at least 5-10 occasions.
While on some occasions parties were involved this was not the case every time. In some cases a much smaller more group attended.
Johnson was transported on several occasions via Alexander Lebedev’s private jet.
The same jet the Lebedev family use for their business in Russia.