Speaker is having a massive go at govt about the way it has gone about local lockdown rules. Shows 'total disregard' for the House.
KS starts #pmqs immediately with local lockdowns. Says only one place has gone into them and come out - Luton. Why does he think that is? PM says Luton was a 'success' because people pulled together and followed the guidance.
Interesting implication, there.
KS: What is the PM's strategy for bring places out of restrictions?
PM: We don't want to bring places into them. It appears atm that the illness 'is more localised', so localised action is needed, as well as the 'strong national measures' announced last week.
KS: I wasn't surprised the PM couldn't remember the rules.
He goes on to quote David Greenhalgh, Tory leader at Bolton council: the measures are 'breeding resentment; people...feel forgotten'.
PM: People do understand the rules, despite Labour's sniping from the sidelines. (So is the Tory leader at Bolton sniping from the sidelines?)
PM says KS should be 'trying to instil some confidence in the British people in the rules he supports'.
KS: The idea anyone questioning the govt at PMQs on these measures is undermining them is 'wearing a bit thin'.
KS moves on to the situation in Newcastle and elsewhere in the NE. Quotes @nick_forbes, who was furious that their measures were announced on Mon before conversations had concluded.
PM says he was surprised; was his 'understanding' that leaders in the NE wanted those measures.
@nick_forbes KS: Chancellor has made a political choice to reduce financial support just as new measures come in. Cites an example from PM's own constituency; wedding venue owner who says the Chancellor's latest plan 'does nothing to help us.'
Oh sorry it wasn't the PM's constituency, think it was the Chancellor's. PM says he 'of course' feels for people affected, but the Labour Party would have bankrupted the country.
KS says PM is 'tin earred' to those whose jobs are at risk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At least two of the proposed deals (per legal advice from October 2023) involved Teesworks Ltd asking the public sector to take on further liabilities, according to the govt review.
The review, which had concerns about vfm and subsidy control in relation to the proposals, states that after the panel inquired, they were told these were informal conversations which were not now being pursued.
The Teesside taxpayer is now on the hook for £4m+ after the mayor/Teesworks tried to ransom the area’s biggest private sector employer - and then conclusively lost at the high court
This is far too long a saga to relay in a thread but, in brief:
PD Ports runs the port next to Teesworks and is the statutory harbour authority for the Tees. In March 2021, the development corporation overseen by Ben Houchen launched legal action against it over access
It sought a declaration that PD had *no* rights at all - and that bit is important - over its land, the former steelworks at Redcar, which is now part of the Teesside freeport
A brief thread on what it’s like to read a South Tees Development Corporation board paper. Approx one third of next week’s agenda is devoted to the declarations of interest procedure, which as we know is rigorously adhered to 1/
There then follows a report about landfill tax exemptions, much of which is about “onerous” environment agency rule changes now making it harder to dump toxic waste /2
There then follows an update from the chief exec, which I have to confess baffled me. Lots of things that looked like they’d been copy and pasted from a previous update 3/
Will do that mega thread soon, not forgotten my somewhat hasty promise
…but thought it was worth, in the first instance, laying out some of the key findings, particularly given some people commenting on it don’t appear to have actually read it.
On great rail cancellations, a reminder that the expansion of Piccadilly, intended to alleviate the chronic northern rail bottleneck in the centre of Manc, was promised a decade ago, then put on ice, messed about with and actually only officially cancelled a few months ago.
The version of Northern Powerhouse Rail eventually signed off by govt two years ago, meanwhile, was a wildly scaled back version of what northern leaders had spent years drawing up (with the backing of George Osborne), because govt didn’t want to spend the £
PD Ports, which owns the port next door to Teesworks - and is also in the Teesside freeport - accused Houchen of ‘inaccurate’ public statements re a case that has been rumbling on for two years on.ft.com/3N0VGOK
The development corporation sued PD over access in 2021. In court papers at the time, PD said it had been directly told by a corporation board member (an allegation that is denied) that the goal was to force a distressed sale: drive down the port’s value, buy it cheap and flip it
The development corporation did then try to buy the port - to incorporate it into Teesworks - when it was put on the market later that year, but owners Brookfield pulled the sale