#MAEdu folks, if the main thing you're pulling from yesterday (and the only thing you're directing your ire at) is the note that we'll have the MCAS in the spring, you've missed the main ongoing undermining of district efforts to keep students and staff safe during a pandemic.
Note that the Governor, in defiance of both logic and best practice, reopened major gathering spaces in so-called green or grey communities.
That is precisely what is not needed at this time.
The Secretary of Education pointedly thanked *only* those districts and school committees that worked to get students back into buildings (not any of the rest of us, apparently).
The Commissioner said that the Department's recommendation for green or grey communities is for "full time in person," something which is logistically impossible for the vast majority of districts given the need for distancing and given the lack of additional resources.
He also said that the state grants "have really allowed schools to do any of the three models" which is patently untrue.
And at least one Board of Ed member spoke of the "failure" of local leadership.
These are things about which to be angry and to call out RIGHT NOW.
This is in fact actually dangerous as well as extraordinarily poor leadership.
I’m sure that sometimes some of you think I am overreacting to the Boston Globe’s education coverage, but you probably couldn’t frame “how is this school funding reform working this year” WORSE than looking at Belmont, Harvard, and Westford.
I could try to invent one, but it’s an incredible manifestation of whom the Globe perceives its audience as AND how poorly it understands the state school funding system.
So I logged off last night to have dinner with my family and write about how the Globe was wrong about school finance (chapter MMXXIII), and it appears I missed some Discourse on Worcester Public Schools funding.
Y’all were busy!
And so, a thread:
Let me first note that when I teach MA school finance (which is part of what I do for work, for those who might be new), I start in 1647, so there’s some history here.
From a Worcester perspective, let’s sum up by saying that the early colonial law that required towns to have schools once they hit a particular size was violated more than once, resulting in the town being fined.
The reason for that is pretty straightforward: Chelsea is three square miles; Franklin County Regional Tech is 500 square miles. Both are Massachusetts school districts. As you might imagine, they spend WILDLY differing amounts on transportation.
What is different between Fall River--and, indeed, any municipal district in Massachusetts--and their neighboring regionals, is, that while BOTH have mandated state reimbursed transportation, only one of those reimbursements gets funded.
finally watching last week's Joint Ways & Means hearing, and appreciate @Jo_Comerford's question on the balance of one time versus sustained funding #MAEdu
she also did a lovely, polite refocus of her question; good chairing!
Cheers also to Sen @AnneGobi for opening her Q to @MassEducation a pointed: "on behalf of the entire Worcester delegation for your thoughtful and spot-on comments regarding the charter school in Worcester. It was extremely appreciated."
ok, good morning, I have a question (just getting to #MAEdu news from yesterday):
This MEEP claim that gaps have widened over the pandemic is based on...what exactly?
We don't yet have the last year's MCAS data. We don't yet have MA NAEP data.
The report cites 2019 to 2021 third grade reading scores, and then percentage of low income 9th graders passing their classes compared to wealthier peers.
Then enrollment in college, which we know dropped...everywhere?