If you've seen extra vitriol on my social media, here's why: the "Q" persona dropped a statement targeting me, citing the discredited NRCC (GOP SuperPAC) attacks on me & my resolution condemning QAnon.
In my first debate with Tom Kean, I warned him that he was playing with a dark and dangerous current in our politics with these vile attacks. He and the NRCC have refused calls from fact checkers, religious leaders, even local Republicans, to disavow them.
Now QAnon, an anti-Semitic conspiracy mongering cult that the FBI views as a potential terrorist threat, is directly amplifying the NRCC's press releases to its millions of online followers.
I'm done asking Kean to do the responsible thing - he's had his chance and owns whatever consequences come.
Meanwhile, I'll continue working with responsible Democrats and Republicans in Congress to combat this and all forms of extremism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Take it from someone who's run in several elections: No matter how unscrupulous a candidate might be, committing fraud in America at a big enough scale to rig an election above a tiny town council race is laughably impossible.
Even the closest ones are settled by several thousand votes (way more for Senate races). I won one in 2020 by just 1%, and a total margin of 5,000 votes.
That's the lowest number a serious fraudster would have to shoot for. 2/
So if you wanted to take advantage of lax photo ID, you'd have to find ≈5,000 people willing to impersonate a real voter at the polls (a felony offense). And hope no more than a handful of those real voters tried to vote (in which case authorities would notice a pattern). 3/
Persian Gulf countries like the UAE and Qatar don't gift planes to a US president or buy his worthless crypto coins for nothing. So what are they getting for their investment? Here are a few immediate examples. 1/
One - Trump is lifting a ban on exports of advanced chips to the Saudi & UAE AI industry. The ban aimed to keep this technology from leaking to China, and ensure that democracies, not mass surveillance dictatorships, lead global development of AI. 2/ finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-rew…
Two - Trump just decided to blow past Congressional objections and approve a helicopter and fighter jet maintenance deal with the UAE. Members of Congress had held the deal up because of the UAE's support for militias committing mass murder in Sudan.
Spare a thought for the small business owners who had to beg and borrow to pay a $145,000 tax on that $100K shipment of product that happened to arrive while the most extreme China tariff was in place, only to see their president back down with zero Chinese concessions. 1/
It could have been worse, so it's good Trump is caving again. But what now? Aggregate tariffs on China stay around 55%. China could repackage some promises on fentanyl to get that down a bit more but not by much. And we seem stuck with a 10% tariff/tax on all foreign imports. 2/
That's a permanent inflationary tax on us all - including on stuff like bananas and rubber for tires that can't be made in the US. It's a double tax on companies that manufacture in the USA - increasing the cost of parts & materials they import and tariffs on what they export. 3/
ICE's leaders seem drunk on the idea that the president can give them unrestrained power. But they work for the people of a pluralistic country, not for one man. The legitimacy this agency will need to continue to exist in a democratic society depends on them remembering that. 1/
When DHS was proposed, critics argued a democracy like ours should not have a single, big, powerful internal security ministry. I was less worried then - until the first Trump term, when we started seeing armed DHS elements with no insignia showing up at political protests. 2/
Democrats in Congress should say now how they'll bring DHS back within the rule of law once they have the power. Anyone with arrest authority should identify themselves, wear uniforms, no masks, and have the same duty to refuse unlawful orders as members of the military. 3/
When I ran the State Department's human rights bureau, few Senators were more interested in our work than Marco Rubio.
If I'd purged from our annual reporting references to stolen elections in Venezuela or unjust imprisonment in China, he'd have called for my resignation. 1/
The State Department is required by law to issue these annual public reports on human rights violations for every country. They are supposed to be "full and complete," covering every major category of human rights abuse, including "prolonged detention without charges." 2/
The point is to force us to be honest about the foreign governments we're dealing with - so that if the president wants to sell arms to a foreign country, or have a chummy relationship with its leader, he can't deny it's torturing prisoners or refusing to hold free elections. 3/
Democrats should take immediate action to force a vote in Congress on Trump's Canada/Mexico tariffs.
Make every House and Senate Republican either break with the president or own the economic consequences.
Can Democrats do this in the minority? Yes, they can. 1/
Trump used his emergency economic powers to impose the tariffs. Under the law, when presidents declare an "emergency," any member of Congress can move to terminate that emergency, and that motion is "privileged," meaning it must get an up or down vote. 2/sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R46…
My guess is a handful of Republicans would vote against these inflationary tariffs if the choice were forced on them. Trump could still veto a successful resolution to terminate the emergency. But that would just further highlight how alone he is in taking us off a cliff.