Today marks 20 years since Tuvia Grossman, the bloodied "Palestinian," appeared all over the media, leading to the creation of HonestReporting.
On Sep 30, 2000, The @nytimes, @AP and others published a photo of a bloodied young man seen near a club-wielding Israeli policeman.
The caption read: “An Israeli policeman and a Palestinian on the Temple Mount.”
The pose suggested that the Israeli policeman was responsible for the injuries of the “Palestinian” man in the foreground.
In reality, the man was not a Palestinian Arab at all, but a Jewish American yeshiva student named Tuvia Grossman. Grossman had been pulled from a taxi in Jerusalem by an Arab mob and severely beaten.
Similarly, from the picture the policeman seems to be threatening. In reality, the Israeli policeman pictured, a Druze Israeli called Gideon Tzefadi, was actually standing over Grossman and *defending* him from the mob.
Seeing his son's picture in the @NYTimes, Alan Grossman sent the following letter to the newspaper: “…that Palestinian is actually my son, Tuvia Grossman, a Jewish student from Chicago. He, and two of his friends, were pulled from their taxicab while traveling in Jerusalem…“
“...by a mob of Palestinian Arabs, and were severely beaten and stabbed. That picture could not have been taken on the Temple Mount because there are no gas stations on the Temple Mount and certainly none with Hebrew lettering.“
In response, the New York Times published a half-hearted correction which identified Tuvia Grossman as “an American student in Israel” — not as a Jew who was beaten by Arabs.
Responding to public outrage at the original error and the inadequate correction, @NYTimes reprinted Tuvia Grossman’s picture — this time with the proper caption — along with a full article detailing his near-lynching at the hands of Palestinians rioters.
The first “correction” also noted that “Mr. Grossman was wounded” in “Jerusalem’s Old City” — although the beating actually occurred in the Arab neighborhood of Wadi al Joz, not in the Old City.
For years after, the media distortion had an ongoing, real-life effect as Arab groups adopted Grossman’s photo in their propaganda campaigns, cynically using a bloodied Jew as a symbol of the Palestinian struggle.
Among others, an official Egyptian government website used the photo on its photo gallery, and the Palestinian Information Center incorporated Grossman’s photo into its homepage banner.
WATCH: A decade later, HonestReporting reunited Grossman with his rescuer, Gidon Tzefadi:
1/ The New York Times doesn’t use the phrase “ethnic cleansing” in its West Bank project.
It doesn't have to.
Selective imagery, distorted data & erased Palestinian terrorism lead to one conclusion: Israel is driving Palestinians off their land.
That claim is false. 🧵⬇️
2/ The article presents a stark moral narrative: “Armed Israeli settlers, often protected by soldiers, harass and attack Palestinian villagers daily, with the undisguised goal of driving them out.”
It describes masked extremists, rampant violence, state backing, and impunity.
It is frightening. It is also profoundly misleading.
3/ This framing rests on three pillars:
• Inflated & distorted violence statistics
• Visual implication without context
• The near-total erasure of Palestinian terrorism
Remove those pillars – and the narrative collapses.
🧵 Same outlets. Same source. Two very different reactions.
Side by side, so you can see it for yourself.
On Dec 11, Amnesty International released a long-delayed report concluding Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7, 2023.
⬇️ Keep reading.
2/ Even Amnesty International – which delayed this report to avoid appearing “pro-Israel” – concluded that Hamas committed crimes against humanity on Oct. 7.
Its own findings cite murder, torture, rape and sexual violence, extermination and other inhumane acts – committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians. amnesty.org/en/documents/m…
3/ Now look at how major media outlets responded.
⬅️ NBC amplifying Amnesty’s genocide accusation against Israel
➡️ NBC showing zero results for Amnesty’s report on Hamas crimes against humanity
Same organization.
Same outlet.
Very different interest.
How Western journalists turn Palestinian terrorism into something sympathetic, inevitable – or Israel’s fault.
A new “feature” repeats every move in the playbook.
Keep reading.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
2/ The piece opens with a fiction: that Palestinian attacks were basically a reaction to Israeli incursions into West Bank towns during the Second Intifada.
Reality: terror attacks on Israeli civilians surged before, during and after that period – hitting buses, cafés, hotels, families.
The Guardian flips the timeline to soften the violence.
3/ Then we get this: Israeli communities are “illegal under international law.”
That’s false.
The US, for example, rejects that framing, many legal scholars dispute it, and only some small outposts are illegal – and Israel removes them.
But the Guardian needs the word “illegal” & suggests total agreement to set up its morality play.