Sunshiny Profile picture
Sep 30, 2020 22 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The serology tests CPC is demanding to be approved are not going to change the fact that Provincial premiers have not invested in expanding testing capacity.

That’s the issue. Not the tests themselves.

Many miss that issue and focus on the absence of Health Canada approval.
What the speaker on P&P stated is true. There are two types of tests. The nasal swab and saliva test.

The nasal swab can detect the virus in very small quantities. It tests for the actual virus in your system.

The test results determined by a lab. Costing a province money.
The saliva test only tests for antigens, not the virus. It can only detect antigens once they reach certain quantities. Meaning, early stages of infection are beyond capacity of the test. Providing a FALSE Negative.

It’s also a health product being sold by for-profit marketers.
Serologic tests don’t impact the provincial budgets as much because the test results are provided almost immediately outside of a lab. So no technician is required. No testing equipment, no lab. Just your saliva and about 15 minutes.

And consumers can buy their own tests.
Meaning conservative free market, private healthcare supporting premiers can pass the cost off to residents. Some people are stating quick tests will improve control of COVid and better enable control of Covid’s impact.
That’s the reason premiers and CPC are pushing for serology tests to be approved immediately.

Expansion of COVid testing requires nasal swabs, people to administer the test, the labs where it is tested, and the technicians to complete the test. Those all cost money.
Select premiers do NOT want to expand testing capacity. They prefer the public take matters into their own hands.

Which premiers are pushing for the tests most?

Kenney,
Ford,
Legault.
The three epicentres of the second wave of COVid & the same three premiers who want private healthcare vs public healthcare.

Coincidence? No.

It shouldn’t be hard for the average citizen to figure out why.
CPC is applying pressure for Health Canada to approve the tests.

Conservative premiers don’t want to expand testing capacity. They don’t want to spend the money on public health. That’s why line ups for testing are so long and why it takes so long to get results.
Publicly funded labs and testing facilities are now operating over capacity. Not enough testing can be done to keep on top of a virus that spreads like a grass fire. Wild and out of control.

For whatever reason conservatives are reluctant to track and isolate COVid outbreaks.
Are those premiers trying to induce a “herd effect” like Trump is in the US? That would require about 60-70% of the population to contract the virus. Many would die. Many many more than would die using nasal swab tests exclusively. Because nasal swab tests are superior accuracy.
Testing capacity is becoming overwhelmed because the numbers of tests in the second wave of COVid far exceeds the numbers during the first wave. We didn’t start at zero cases.

When COVid began in January 2020, we started from a base of zero cases.
Tests were restricted to symptomatic patients.
That’s no longer the case since we’ve learned about asymptomatic infection, super spreaders and the long lag between infection and symptoms. But transmission begins long before symptoms occur, if they ever occur.
The base is no longer zero. It’s 23,224 and rising sharply. And those are the cases we are aware of and confirmed. We know people are infected and moving about the community. So more people are going to get infected and more people are spreading the infection.
Keeping on top of the second wave and flattening the curve REQUIRES significantly more testing. We know more about the virus and how contagious it is.

Meaning we need more testing capacity to track and isolate outbreaks quickly. Or the virus will spread untraced exponentially.
But select premiers are refusing to expand testing. Putting all the emphasis on serologic tests. Tests that only indicate antigens, not the infection. To confirm infection, a nasal swab test must be completed.
If only individuals with positive saliva tests receive a nasal swab test, that would drastically reduce the number of tests conducted (reducing provincial financial commitment) and exponentially spread Covid among the population (false negatives). Untraced and unchecked.
Serology ONLY indicates a positive once a certain level of antigens are produced. But the ability to infect others comes long before sufficient levels of antigen are detectable.

This would produce US and UK level morbidity and mortality rates (infection & death rates).
Serologic tests are NOT the game changer. But Conservatives are trying to pass it off as a game changer, because it allows provinces to refuse expansion of testing capacity. And pass the cost off to concerned citizens.
The result of approving saliva tests for diagnosis would be exacerbation of the spread of COVid in Canada. Unless the saliva tests are used properly: it is NOT TO BE USED TO DIAGNOSE COVID!

canada.ca/en/health-cana…
Provinces need to expand testing for COVid. Immediately. We are moving into the second wave and it WILL be much worse than the first wave.

And Canadians need to remember what conservatives are making a priority. It is NOT the public’s health.
The priority seems to be profits for test developers. And transfer of the cost back onto the public. Giving the public a false sense of security and safety.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

May 18
It amazes me.

I spoon feed people evidence, but no one wants to take this bitter medicine.

Cons have had a published playbook that lays out the plan to remove liberalism and democracy since 2005.

Harper used it to weaken or dismantle democratic institutions.
When Harper was PM, he worked within the so-called moderate conservatives neoliberal agenda. PP represents big “C” conservatives: socially conservative, Christian nationalist & radically extremist.

Stockwell Day proved that Canadians were not going to accept radical reform.
He was laughed out of the leadership of the Canadian Reform Alliance Party for his firm belief in human beings sharing space with dinosaurs. People often remember him for showing up to a press conference on a jet ski. But he is a devout big “C” Christian Nationalist conservative.
Read 18 tweets
May 18
Wasn’t that the whole point of limiting the Supreme Court’s powers in Israel?

Ditto Hungary?



None of this is new. @TrumpFile

Even Canada has a 2005 playbook detailing how to install conservative governance in perpetuity. hrw.org/report/2013/05…


Image
Image
The table of contents is clear. But the conclusion is even more revealing.

This playbook was written in 2005 by a socially liberal small “c” conservative.

Harper used this playbook to change Canada.

It’s why we don’t recognize Canada and why it’s institutions are failing.
Image
Image
Thirteen think tanks including world renowned paleolibertarian favourite Fraser Institute.

A media destroyed by foreign ownership. Harper tried to amend the Broadcasting Act in 2011.

Cons want to remove CBC & CRTC. No pesky regulations that block hate speech & Fox North SUN TV.
Read 15 tweets
May 1
This is called the ole switcheroo.

This is why liberals and lefties should stop pointing fingers. The left is not very good at it. But the right excels at double standards and hypocrisy.

Yesterday, PMJT revealed that CPC is led by a man courting white supremacists.
But today, people are repeating the word “whacko” in relation to the PM and BC drug policy and debating whose leader was more ethical.

No one is discussing white supremacy being given legitimacy by PP this past weekend.

Who gives a crap about decorum & process in QP?
Apparently it’s more important to focus on the process and decorum than the fact the attack on the Speaker was a coordinated event by CPC & perfectly demonstrates that CPC IS courting white supremacists and attacking the first Canadian black Speaker for doing his job.
Read 35 tweets
Apr 29
I need you to understand that this is not a criticism of communism, it’s a criticism of anarchy.

Communism is not what happened in Russia 1922. It is what happened in Russia 1917.

Please read some history.

Honestly, how people make up such vapid stories is disturbing.
Russia was a monarchy prior to 1917.

Weak leadership of Nicholas II & an uninterrupted feudal system were inadequate to provide for the whims of the elite and the sustenance of the poor. He became untenable in an time when rigid social status was being challenged by liberalism.
Marxism is a 19th century Enlightenment influenced theory of social organization and economics that is an ideal, not reality. For all the effort Marx made to emphasize his ideas be brought to fruition through revolution, the public often confuses Marxism with anarchism.

Image
Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Apr 19
Dereliction of duty belongs to society and our continued acceptance of the devaluation of some members of society over others.

Society is responsible for ignoring the needs of some of its members because they are deemed less valuable.
Our social and political systems legitimize devaluation of the poor, PWD, seniors and children because they do not produce profits, rather they consume resources.

Society would need to reconsider the premise of its systemic foundations to alter this reality.
The premise that most human beings are just capital that can either produce or consume goods and services became reality at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. A product of feudalist social strata.

Why people fail to recognize these beliefs is unknown, they surround us.
Read 25 tweets
Apr 18
People need to remember that disability funding is 100% provincial.

So expecting the feds to take over disability funding is unreasonable at this point.

However, what if the plan is to assume responsibility when provinces abandon disability funding? Because they will.
They’re already moving in that direction.

It’s the same strategy that was used for Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplements for citizens over age 65.

Benefits for seniors is actually the province’s jurisdiction as listed in the BNA 1867.

Image
Image
Image
After industrialization in Canada and people began moving to cities and towns, seniors were dying in abject poverty. So the feds stepped in. But not without some constitutional manoeuvring first.

People forget, retirement is a 20th century concept.

historymuseum.ca/cmc/exhibition…


Image
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(