Ok so I've finally reviewed the LTC Fall Preparedness Plan, which should have been the LTC SPRING/SUMMER Preparedness Plan (but what can you do at this point).
I still can't believe that homes are only receiving this huge lump sum of $405 million for IPAC, PPE + Staffing NOW (which makes you wonder what they received prior).
That said, WHY must the province pay for items that profit-rich for-profit homes can pay themselves??
3/8 TESTING.
What EXACTLY is this TESTING PLAN?
This only says how many staff have EVER been tested.
How often are they tested?
Is this uniformly stipulated across all homes or do individual homes decide?
The LACK OF TRANSPARENCY re: testing has always been a problem.
4/8. The IMS is back. You know how I feel about the IMS.
It's 80% male, majority hospital CEOs, a For-Profit CEO (owner of @SchlegelVillage who was one of @celliottability's largest campaign contributors).
So we learn that the PSW program w/ the $5,000 incentive is for only 1000 WORKERS. The remaining ~1000 that I can see will be pushed through sans incentive & via 'accelerated' training programs (because a pandemic is the BEST time to rush training on HC workers🤨)
6/8 STAFFING Cont.
QUE. HIRED 10,000 workers & started 4 mos. ago/
BC stabilized staffing after the FIRST OUTBREAK in March.
~2000 workers= is pathetic.
PS. If @fordnation legislated better staffing ratios, ALOT OF PUBLIC FUNDS COULD BE SAVED.
Media should ask why he won't.
7/8 ESSENTIAL FAMILY CAREGIVERS
*The one glimmer.
Essential caregivers RETAIN ACCESS AT ALL TIMES.
Keep this handy in the event your LTC home gives you a hard time and/or let us know!
FMI: health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/program…
8/8 A REFRESEHER ON ESSENTIA; CAREGIVER DEFITNION.
(from the Sept 9 release....bookmark for your records)
- Up to 2 designates allowed.
- Both CAN be allowed to visit at the SAME time unless in outbreak (then just 1 at a time).
- Must be 18 years of age of older.
8b.
I lied...one more FINAL TWEET.
Second paragraph in the pic below alludes to LTC DOCTORS (which my friend @AmitAryaMD & I talk about often) and many of whom were MIA during wave 1.
What exactly is meant by "best practices to support medical directors" ⁉️
MORE INFO. NEEDED.
@tamarfern remind them of this and if they keep giving you a hard time...let me know!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 (1/10). When we first resumed in-person again at my Uni, I vividly remember a chat with a student who approached me after class. We had just finished a lecture on the origins of the MMR-Autism myth which then spilled over to a chat on the current covid 💉conspiracies/myths….
🧵 (2/10). He told me how his parents went down the online covid-conspiracy rabbit hole and had become “radicalized”. I remember being struck with how apt the word was to explain what had/was happening to so many folks during the pandemic.
🧵 (3/10). In my lecture, we talked about how unstable much information from the online world is today (I discussed the Trump election and the disinformation campaign out of Macedonia back in 2016) and how sadly profitable it is to outright lie & spread disinformation for clicks.
When people show you who they are, believe them (and yes, our media should be pushing him more on his well-documented and often deeply troubling takes/views yet they've largely given him a pass).
A good read by @richardwarnica 👇 thestar.com/news/gta/2023/… via @TorontoStar
"In 2022, Furey left the Sun’s parent company, Postmedia, to join the True North Centre for Public Policy, a Canadian charity that operates a hard right media arm, as vice-president of editorial and content".
👇🏻 If you still follow him, you need to do some self-reflection. He’s not the only covid “influencer” who came out of nowhere and demonstrated a clear pattern of incredibly toxic, often abusive behaviour. There are others still here with large platforms doing daily damage, too.
A rising number of online 🦠 “influencers” (speaking broadly here as a general type) have learned that displaying a rage-farming, polarizing presence gets them likes/followers (which is a sad indictment on our society, fyi) so pay attention when you see this behaviour & avoid it.
Remember, there is a big difference between punching up and going after structural power versus vindictively attacking random individuals and trying to ruin their reputations when your bad behaviour is called out (I see this often from such personality types).
I vividly remember being out one night about 15 yrs ago for a high school reunion of sorts & we were chatting about something I was fighting for at the time (because yes, I've always been this way lol) and I will never forget what one of the girls said to me.....
I had just finished chatting about a cause and she very casually said to me (having no realization how much this was to mean to me): "If I ever have a daughter, I want her to be like you. You're kind & care so much about people but you're tough, and you don't take💩 from anyone".
I never forgot that moment. I probably never will. Heck, she doesn't even realize how much that casual comment meant to me. I share this because I know speaking the truth (especially to power) doesn't always win you favour/friends and it can be very scary to do so...but you must.
🧵1/5. Because I studied this in my PhD., I shall expand on this for anyone who has yet to see the clear pattern here. This is all the result of the ONGOING REFUSAL TO ENUMARATE WOMEN'S WORK.
LTC. same problem.
NURSING. same problem.
CHILDCARE. same problem.
ALL OF THESE JOBS INVOLVE REPRODUCTIVE LABOUR THAT WAS ONCE CARRIED OUT FOR FREE, IN PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS BY WOMEN (when we weren't granted the ability to compete in the paid labour market).
3/5. All of these shortages we're seeing right now = the result of governments & private business refusing to provide safe working conditions & decent pay to work that is overrepresented by WOMEN.
🧵So I've spoken to the family discussed in this post and it's worth explaining the terrible end of life predicaments some #LTC families are dealing with.
So this sweet resident was sent to ER with a life-threatening condition that was deemed palliative by attending hospital MD.
The family, who have had TERRIBLE experiences with their #ForProfit#LTC do not want their loved one to be sent back to that LTC to die in more neglect (obviously). They want them in a hospital, preferably in a palliative care wing where they can have better care provisioning.
Even the attending MD agreed. However, the 90+ year old #LTC resident (now hospital patient) has lived past the period the hospital staff thought he would (but he is still palliative, to be sure). Yet, this week's attending MD disagrees w/ initial MD for palliative placement.