Before a leave for the Capitol this morning, wanted to point out a few things in Playbook.
Today is a big day in @SpeakerPelosi and @stevenmnuchin1 seemingly endless quest to inject more than $1 trillion of fresh money into the economy.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 PELOSI and MNUCHIN met for an hour and a half Wednesday afternoon to try to reach an agreement, but found many areas that needed work.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 Here’s what our sources told us remained open: state and local funding (long an issue … Ds want roughly $500 billion, and Republicans are near $250 billion), K-12 ($225 billion for Dems, and $150 billion for Republicans) and a host of tax provisions, some related to health care.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 REPUBLICANS TELL US THE DEAL NEEDS TO BE LESS THAN $2 trillion for it to pass their muster, and Dems want a deal at $2 trillion plus -- so that’s the first issue. Those aren’t firm demands, just the general feeling among the dozens of people we spoke to Wednesday.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 And even if it’s at $1.6 trillion -- MNUCHIN’S offer -- it faces an incredibly treacherous path in the GOP Senate, where insiders told us it may never make it to the floor.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 POLICY IS MADE BY PEOPLE -- a very small set of them. So here’s how we see the incentives at play, at the moment.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 -- PELOSI made a calculation a few months ago: The TRUMP ADMINISTRATION was going to come back to the table to negotiate with her on a Covid relief package if she just waited long enough.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 Some Democrats thought she should buckle and take offers for less than $2 trillion -- she didn’t, and there was some grumbling that she had overplayed her hand. Talks broke down.
@SpeakerPelosi@stevenmnuchin1 Then PELOSI moved from $3.4 trillion to $2.4 trillion. And here we are, with talks restarted and the White House back at the table, showing its eagerness to cut a deal.
HERE’S A REALITY THAT’S QUITE CLEAR for PELOSI and House Democrats: JOE BIDEN is the favorite to win the White House, and a better deal isn’t too far around the corner if this falls apart.
When PELOSI delayed the vote on her Dem Covid relief bill Wednesday, her leadership team saw it as the speaker giving this one last chance while MNUCHIN was serious, and while White House chief of staff MARK MEADOWS was out of the room.
It seems as if Democrats will give the talks a few hours this morning, then if they fail, they’ll move to their bill and move on. It would be very hard at this point for Republicans to say with a straight face that PELOSI doesn’t want a deal, given her eagerness at this moment.
BUT MAN, if she gets a deal here, this Congress will be bookended by PELOSI owning the White House: besting President DONALD TRUMP in the shutdown in early 2019, and now this.
>>@stevenmnuchin1 -- MNUCHIN WANTS A DEAL. Everyone who interacts with him understands that. He participated extensively in an NYT Mag story about his prowess as a dealmaker -- was noticed in the Cap, & compounded the distaste and dislike for him among Rs
@stevenmnuchin1 -- @senatemajldr IS NOT going to put a bill on the floor that doesn’t command the support of a majority of Senate Rs -- or damn close to it -- and a bill north of $1 trillion won’t accomplish that.
@stevenmnuchin1@senatemajldr Don’t assume that if TRUMP says jump here, MCCONNELL asks him how high. So if PELOSI and MNUCHIN come up with a deal -- if they come up with anything -- it’s not necessarily cool with MCCONNELL.
@stevenmnuchin1@senatemajldr LISTEN TO WHAT MCCONNELL is saying. He made clear Wednesday what he thought of the negotiations: They are “very, very far apart.” Do you need him to say more?
@stevenmnuchin1@senatemajldr IF A DEAL COMES TOGETHER, it will take another week or more to see any action. If PELOSI sees that a deal is in the offing, she’ll go for it and make it happen. If not, talks will peter out until after the election.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After speaking all day to top House Republicans, here's are the options for reconciliation.
stay the course -- and pull a rabbit out of a hat.
Johnson is an optimist. You gotta give him that. The Louisiana Republican has maintained that the mess that we’re seeing right now is all part of what he calls the “deliberative process.” Fair enough. There’s certainly a lot of deliberating going on.
But there’s a path — a narrow path — for House Republicans to get a budget resolution allowing “one big beautiful bill” to move forward.
Following a very long meeting in the speaker’s office Tuesday night that included GOP leadership, committee chairs and some of the hardliners, there were signs of progress, although no agreement yet.
“I think when you look at where we are, we’re close to a trillion [dollars in cuts] and still working,” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told reporters afterward.
Scalise added that House GOP leaders “are focused on” trying to mark up a budget resolution next week.
They’ve also directed all the committees involved in this process to come up with more spending cuts. “We’re working on details for each committee,” Scalise said. “But we have gone back to each committee to increase those numbers. We’re not done on it.”
Plus, Republicans will think expansively about how to count savings — DOGE, projected 3% economic growth and a juiced economy from slashing regulations.
Then there’s Trump.
Can Trump, who has had limited legislative success during his first term, get Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) to back Johnson’s plan? Trump hasn’t yet leaned on lawmakers to get the reconciliation process going. By next week, he may have to.
Switch to two bills.
Hold onto your hat, Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.). There are House Republicans talking about the Budget Committee switching course and marking up the dual-track reconciliation process that Smith, the Ways and Means Committee chair, has railed against for months.
Trump says he doesn’t care if there’s one bill or two bills as long as his agenda gets approved. There are plenty of senior aides in the White House who want two bills. And the House Freedom Caucus wants two also.
The first reconciliation package would have defense spending, energy policy and border security provisions. The second reconciliation package — the tax-cut portion — would be punted until later. When exactly is unclear.
Smith doesn’t like the two-bill approach. In his view, that puts tax cuts at risk. Yet if the Budget Committee remains stuck, House Republicans may not have a choice.
Chip Roy, the floor is yours.
There’s always an inclination in House Republican leadership to say something like this: “OK, Freedom Caucus. If you think your idea is so great, give it a shot, and let’s see how it goes.”
Play this out with us for a moment. What if Johnson tells Roy, Norman and the other conservative holdouts that they should write whatever budget resolution they want, try to push it through the Budget Committee and the full House, and then see what the Senate will do with it?
Of course, a Freedom Caucus-favored package may not get through the Budget Committee. If it does, it could fail on the House floor. And it will certainly get ripped to shreds in the Senate.
But there’s utility in that exercise to show that hardliners need to drop their draconian spending-cut demands and embrace a bill that can actually become law. That’s the real goal of legislating, right?
We have acquired @electoanalytics, a data startup that focuses on Congress.
Electo Analytics is a truly special platform. It tracks and allows collaboration on bills, tracks regulations and has a fulsome directories of the Hill, state and local public officials and aides.
The deal valued Punchbowl News at north of $100 million.
But I want to take a second to talk about what our goals are. And what Punchbowl News wants to do going forward.
From our start nearly 3 years ago, our aim was to create a news organization that serves people who care deeply about the politics of governing.
We do that through our three newsletters -- AM, Midday and PM. We do that through our social and newsmaker events. We do that through our polling of Capitol Hill and K Street.
And we will do that through our acquisition of Electo Analytics, which will be folded into Punchbowl News. We want Punchbowl News to be the place where you get your news -- and where you do your work in Washington. We'll be building this platform out with the Hill/Downtown in mind -- and with everyone's input.