The House Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing right now on proposals to change the antitrust laws.

Critics of the current laws want to make it easier to break up Big Tech.

Re-sharing my thread about the 10 myths related to tech & antitrust that you need to know.
Myth #1: “Big Tech companies are monopolies”

People use this term loosely (which I get!) to mean that a company is big or dominant, but when it comes to an actual monopolization case, the legal meaning of the word really matters.
According to DOJ guidelines, it’s “a market share in excess of two-thirds.”

The tech companies likely don’t exceed that threshold in any antitrust product market.

- Amazon 38% of ecommerce
- Apple 58% of US smartphone OS
- Google 29% of digital ads
- Facebook 23% of digital ads Image
Myth #2: “Big Tech harms consumers”

According to DOJ, an antitrust enforcer must show “harm society by making output lower, prices higher, and innovation less than would be the case in a competitive market.”

But prices in the relevant markets have been falling (or at zero). Image
Myth #3: “Big Tech doesn’t innovate”

Innovation is hard to measure directly, but we can look at R&D spending as a proxy.

The Big Tech companies are all in the top 10 for most spending on R&D in the US. Image
We can also look at capital expenditures. Complacent monopolists would rather distribute profits to shareholders than make risky investments. Large capital expenditures suggest the companies are worried about competition.

Big Tech also leads the country in capex. Image
Myth #4: “Network effects make Big Tech unbeatable”

Network effects mean a service gets more valuable to users the more other users join it. Some people think this is special to tech, but it isn’t (a telephone is only valuable insofar as there are other people who own phones.)
Three important points:

1. Network effects are nothing new.
2. Network effects can confer market power, but also consumer benefits from positive spillovers. Breaking up networks destroys both.
3. Network effects work in reverse too (dominant networks can quickly unravel). Image
Myth #5: “Big Tech is killing the startup ecosystem”

Critics say Big Tech smothers startups.

But VC investment is at all-time highs in terms of number of deals. It’s near all-time highs in terms of dollars invested. Image
Also, even if VCs are hesitant to fund a direct competitor, competition has a funny way of evolving over time. Check out this story from @WillRinehart about Google’s founding: Image
Myth #6: “Big Tech companies only compete in one market”

An underrated source of competition for the tech giants is each other. While each of the Big Five has its core area of strength, they are constantly making incursions on each other’s territory and jockeying for position. Image
Myth #7: “Data is a significant barrier to entry to competing with Big Tech”

Training data for ML algorithms has rapidly diminishing returns.

Once you clear a certain threshold, the key differentiator is the quality of the model. You need to hire top-level ML engineers for that Image
Myth #8: “Stock market concentration is at an all-time high due to Big Tech”

The NYT and FT are pushing this narrative (as you can see in the chart on the left).

But the top 5 largest companies in the S&P 500 regularly accounted for more than 20% of the index in the 60s and 70s ImageImage
Myth #9: “The American public hates Big Tech (‘techlash’)”

Survey after survey contradicts this narrative, but it somehow manages to persist.

Yes, some politicians in DC hate Big Tech. So do the far left and the far right.

But the vast majority of Americans really like tech. Image
Myth #10: “It was obvious that some Big Tech acquisitions were anticompetitive”

This one is pure hindsight bias. To take one example, critics who don’t like Facebook claim that the Instagram merger was anticompetitive and should have been blocked.
Instagram has more than a billion users now and is Facebook’s most valuable.

But when IG was acquired in 2012, it only had 30 million users and no revenue.

Jon Stewart joked, “A billion dollars of money? For a thing that kind of ruins your pictures?"

More detail in my full piece: medium.com/@progressivepo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec 🌐

Alec 🌐 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlecStapp

6 Oct
🚨 House Judiciary Committee report on tech and antitrust is out!

Thread with some of my initial reactions as I go through it...
First highly misleading claim:

"a decade into the future, 30% of world GDP may lie with [Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google] and just a handful of others."

Source is a McKinsey report, which says 30% is literally all B2B and B2C commerce globally.

Not "a handful of others"!!
It's so ironic to me that of the 100 acquisitions Facebook has made, the Instagram acquisition is the one most commonly criticized while also being the only one that was extensively investigated & cleared by regulators in the US & abroad at the time.

Lots of hindsight bias here!
Read 22 tweets
29 Jul
The CEOs of Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook will be testifying in front of Congress today.

Critics want to break up the companies.

Here are the 10 myths about Big Tech and antitrust you should be aware of before tuning in.
Myth #1: “Big Tech companies are monopolies”

People use this term loosely (which I get!) to mean that a company is big or dominant, but when it comes to an actual monopolization case, the legal meaning of the word really matters.
According to DOJ guidelines, it’s “a market share in excess of two-thirds.”

The tech companies likely don’t exceed that threshold in any antitrust product market.

- Amazon 38% of ecommerce
- Apple 58% of US smartphone OS
- Google 29% of digital ads
- Facebook 23% of digital ads
Read 17 tweets
14 May
1/ What's the difference between neoliberalism and social democracy?

Re-sharing this great thread from @CascadianSolo, which had been lost to the sands of Twitter...
2/ "I. Am. Not. A. Social. Democrat.

I'm a neoliberal.

Left-neoliberalism on this site is often conflated with social democracy. It really, really shouldn't be.

Key differences between left-neoliberals and social democrats, a thread:"
3/ "Because some of you don't seem to know the difference.

Minimum wage:

Social Democrats generally want high minimum wages, particularly nationally. Left-neoliberals are more cautious, preferring minimum wages set based on cost of living."
Read 11 tweets
24 Apr
1/ Hal's analysis hinges on this claim that Amazon controls "nearly 70% of gross merchandise transacted across all US online platforms."

In fact, Amazon's share of US e-commerce (including both 1st party and 3rd party sales) is 38%.

Here's why the numbers are so different...
2/ Hal cites a report from Digital Commerce.

I followed the link, but there is no direct statistic for Amazon's share of the US ecommerce market.

Instead there is an infographic showing the five largest US e-commerce platforms.
3/ Here are the number from that infographic:

Amazon: $339b
eBay: $90b
Walmart: $49b
Wish: $10b
Houzz: $9b

339 / (339+90+49+10+9) = 68.21%

There's Hal's "nearly 70%" figure.

This is wrong wrong wrong for two reasons.
Read 6 tweets
9 Apr
1/ @calebwatney and I wrote 4,000 words for @mercatus detailing how we can use government purchase guarantees and targeted deregulation to massively increase production of essential medical supplies.

Short thread with the highlights...

mercatus.org/publications/c…
2/ Everyone is talking about using Title I of the Defense Production Act (DPA) to effectively nationalize the supply chain of critical medical supplies.

But there’s a much faster and more effective path forward to eliminate shortages...

3/ To maximize production of critical medical supplies, policymakers should:

- make purchase guarantees
- issue guaranteed loans
- grant liability waivers
- offer FDA exemptions
- delegate product testing
- remove EUA quantity limits
- expand imports
- waive price gouging laws
Read 14 tweets
20 Mar
1/ I wrote 3,000 words for The Dispatch on what exactly went wrong with coronavirus testing in the US

thedispatch.com/p/timeline-the…
2/ The first coronavirus case in the US and South Korea was detected on January 21.

South Korea quickly ramped up widespread testing.

Why did the US fail to do the same?

In short: the FDA dropped the ball.
3/ There have been 3 major regulatory barriers to scaling up testing

- obtaining an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
- being certified for high-complexity testing under CLIA
- complying with HIPAA Privacy Rule and the Common Rule related to protection of human research subjects
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!