I wrote a story about my miscarriages and several newspapers said they couldn’t feature it as I didn’t have a heartbreaking photo of me reacting to my losses to make it “powerful”. A woman shares just such an image today and is shamed for it. Both of these situations make me sad
Things I was asked for
“a photo of you crying?”
(No. I hid my losses, few people saw me cry)
“any bump photos or scans?”
(No because I didn’t get scan photos for my losses and I didn’t take many bump photos for fear of losses)
“Baby shower pics?”
(too scared to consider a shower)
It is really important to normalise grief. To take photos of bumps and babies.Especially after a death to remember your baby. All those things are appropriate,but there are also reasons why they don’t happen.Whatever you do it may not be through choice but it will be with sadness
remember the media, and social media are okay with particular portrayals of #babyloss and not others. Too raw;angry;mad;aren’t white, young,attractive and straight your stories are worth less or aren’t told at all. Even images of beloved babies who’ve died are judged and censored
I have written a lot about #babyloss but I still haven’t shared the story of my miscarriages. At some point I hope a newspaper or magazine will be willing to run it.
Also alongside requests for tragic (but not too graphic) photos to go with my story of my miscarriages journalists wanted a happy photo shoot of me with my kids to “prove happy endings exist”. If media don’t get #babyloss then opportunities for awareness raising can’t happen
I know for some people sharing their rainbow babies is important, no judgement here for that. My problem was that to promote a book I was asked to summon up more tragedy and use my kids to give false hope. Refusing to do this meant limited publicity for an awareness text.
I was so upset by requests for unrealistic tragic tales of hope (theme: 'I had losses but all of us could have a baby in the end') I wrote my own story in an hour of rage and tears. One paper was interested, we did a photoshoot. But another news story came along and it never ran
We're encouraged to raise awareness and many do so in creative and powerful ways. It's exhausting and stressful on top of existing trauma and grief. When media/social media react either to only show certain angles, shut down others, and reinforce isloation and shame. That hurts
Finding your voice and sharing your story is hard. It becomes harder if people react negatively, attempt to silence you, or promise to use your words to assist others then disappear you. And of course not just you, this is a memorial for lost babies so it's much more than a story
I didn't talk about this when it happened a couple of years ago because I was shocked, embarrassed and ashamed. If you're supposed to be promoting your work, albeit to raise awareness, you aren't supposed to talk about failure. I failed to stay pregnant,I failed to share my story
What we don't talk about amidst awareness raising is it is cliquey. Charities may welcome you as an ambassador or sideline you. You may or may not get publicity (and both of these comes with a personal cost). You will be exhausted and possibly re-traumatised. Women cannot win.
The true cost of this is carried by Black women whose stories aren't heard, and if shared are met with racist abuse, echoing inequalities and harms in healthcare. Lesbian and bi women are also sidelined and shamed. Those who have terminations for medical reasons struggle too.
Stories from trans men and non binary people who experience #babyloss are there but again aren't shared (or if they are, are met with transphobia). Partners of those who've miscarried are getting more attention but that's been a struggle and still has to fit particular narratives
If you experience #babyloss and you're a teenager, are disabled then your stories are either not heard and shared or they're reinterpreted as your loss being a positive thing which has all kinds of hateful insinuations. All this influences and reflects what happens in healthcare
TL;DR whether you share your story of loss (including photos) you may be lucky and find a welcoming social/media and wider audience. And you may not. The privileges that influence whose stories are told are mirrored by who gets better healthcare and charitable assistance.
If you see someone sharing their #babyloss story and you want to be mean,just pass on by.Otherwise show some comfort,they'll appreciate it even if they don't say so.Use it as a chance to raise awareness,lobby for better care, donate. Notice whose stories are not there too,amplify
It's okay if you've a story you want to tell but not share. Write or draw,make a memory box,write letters or cards for your baby,whatever you need to do. As an advice columnist whenever I write about loss people send me their stories, not for publishing,just so someone else knows
I've heard from hundreds of people in their 80s or 90s who experienced miscarriage or stillbirth and encouraged not to talk about it and 'move on'.They didn't move on and they never forgot. A private space to talk about that and, crucially, name and remember their baby is healing
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's #ResearchTip is imposter syndrome is more than feeling you don't belong. It can be a belief you don't deserve what you've achieved. That good things aren't really yours, they cannot last, or shouldn't be enjoyed. A quick 🧵on how to cope. #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter
Reflecting on our journey into academia can be positive. We may find ourselves amazed or happy when we consider just how far we've come, especially if we break down and note our achievements along the way. But some - or a lot of the time - this may be challenging. Why?
It may be due to our past. If we've lived with or through exclusion, prejudice, poverty, insecurity, violence, or other negative experiences then believing in ourselves, having confidence, or a sense of pride or self-worth can be difficult or impossible.
Today's #ResearchTip is a 🧵all about why teaching methods comparatively (qual vs. quant) is a red flag - and why you've probably been taught really badly without even knowing it. (This tip's not a judgement on the QT below btw). #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #HigherEd #MedEd
The quoted tweet shows two images from forthcoming movies. Qual is represented by actor Margot Robbie as Barbie (in vibrant pinks and blue accent colours) and Quant as Cillian Murphy as Oppenheimer (severe, black and white). Barbie is qual, Oppenheimer is quant. #HigherEd #MedEd
The quote tweet has been reacted to enthusiastically, helpfully illustrating how the qual/quant discourse goes
- qual is fluffy and nonsense, quant is precise and clear
- everyday sexism about qual
- quant's better than qual (or vice versa)
- lack of wider contextual awareness
Improving numeracy "to find the best mortgage deal" - mate, most young people are paid so poorly they can't afford to move out of their home. And their families are struggling financially as a consequence. Can your numeracy teaching fix that?
Not a single mention of not enough maths teachers, teachers under huge pressure and stress, rising behaviour problems in schools, lack of SEND provision, nothing about early years. What a joke this lot are. They don't care about education or young people at all.
It's worth noting that Year 11s are currently in the process of applying to college and I bet loads of them will hear this news, panic, assume it's already happening, and now change courses or want to avoid continuing in education. More pressure for schools to deal with.
Make time to read this today. My take is if we taught research methods appropriately we might not need methodological review boards. But given how bad much research is (ESPECIALLY surveys) this is definitely worth considering. If not a formal board, then a feedback review system
We separate methods from ethics and focus on maximising funding and response rates and getting published. All else in between - including what method you picked and whether it's suited to your participants and research question - are secondary 😠
I'm seeing an increasing number of suggestions that we need regulatory bodies to assess research methods, research integrity and more. Which I fear will not improve how we teach and do research (what we need) but will just be perceived as a hoop to jump through.
My maths teacher told me I was thick and, in Year 11, had me sit at the front of the class by her desk as punishment for not trying hard enough. I did badly at school so did have to continue with maths until I was 18. Failed two years worth of resits as well. Hated it.
Inevitably, whenever I post about my struggles with maths people say 'it'll be different now'. But it won't be because I had an undiagnosed learning difficulty at school that hasn't magically cured itself. I can't do it. Excelling in other areas doesn't mean I'm lazy in maths.
Having support to use numbers and organisation in everyday life would be very helpful. Endless, repetitive maths teaching in the hope I'd eventually get something I'll never understand was not. How do I manage doing research? If it's quantitative I work with statisticians 😄
A quick heads-up that 'Blue Monday' will be upon us soon and already I see coaches, therapists and influencers using it to promote themselves/their services and journalists preparing pieces on it. It's a bunch of nonsense with a horrible backstory. Be wary of anyone sharing it.
People either don't know the history of this day, meaning they're happily promoting their services based on something they failed to do due diligence on. Or they know but don't care because they want to capitalise on the day. Either is unfortunate.
The tricky part of crappy 'Blue Monday' is it has taken on its own momentum so any kind of challenge to it gives it more oxygen. And most people see it as just a bit of fun so won't stop using it. Worryingly a lot of those folk are mental/health charities who should know better.