Over the past few days, Gavin Newsom signed (and vetoed) a flurry of California bills linked to the criminal legal system.
And to keep it together, here's a thread of 10 important bills that he signed, & also 2 that he vetoed, with links that help flesh out what's going on.
1/ SB203 (signed) requires that minors be able to consult with legal counsel before a police interrogation.
It will make it easier for defendants to appeal a conviction or sentence on the grounds that it is racially discriminatory. It allows use of statistical evidence to show inequity while seeking relief. (See link above for more.)
4/ AB 1506 (signed) shifts the responsibility of investigating police killings of unarmed people onto the state’s attorney general, instead of local district attorneys.
5/ A few years ago, California barred the imposition of some fines & court fees on minors & on their parents or guardians, effective Jan. 2018. SB1290 (signed) vacates the fines and fees that had already been imposed as of that date.
6/ AB1950 (signed) will reduce the length of probation, capping it at 1 year for misdemeanors & 2 for felonies. Probation terms are stringent & can result in incarceration over technical violations, a pattern law seeks to diminish.
7/ AB1185 authorizes counties to set up an oversight board with subpoena power to conduct oversight over the sheriff's department.
Sheriffs have so little oversight! But in LA, the sheriff intends to ignore even subpoanas issued against him, so we'll see where this goes.
8/ SB 32 provides that transgender people be detained in a prison based on their gender identity; but it also enables the state system to ignore this provision by citing “management or security concerns.”
9/ SB823 (signed, like all above) takes a step toward phasing out state youth prisons. Existing prisons will stop admitting most minors starting in July 2021; minors will be incarcerated instead in facilities run by their county governments.
10/ AB 3234 (signed) does 2 things: It expands eligibility for the state’s elderly parole process (e.g. people will be eligible at age 50 instead of 60). And it enables judges to steer people toward pre-trial diversion (with which charges drop) without a prosecutor’s assent.
Now for 2 noteworhty bills that Newsom vetoed.
11/ Newsom vetoed CRISES Act. It'd have set up a pilot program for community programs of medical or mental health professionals to respond to some emergency calls instead of police. More info/links in thread:
12/ Also vetoed last night: SB555, which would have capped the cost of phone & video calls for incarcerated people, & capped the inflation of commissary items, to fight exhorbitant fees/prices incarcerated people have to pay.
CODA: This is meant to *only* cover stuff that's happened over the past few days (and even then I surely missed a few).
There've been other bills adopted over the past few weeks/months. You can find out some more here as always. theappeal.org/political-repo…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Moment of instability today again in France (not that the crisis ever stopped since Macron called snap elections), which may lead the new conservative government to fall. That'd pretty much leave the country in uncharted territory, again.
Quick thread to explain:
1. The (unnecessary) July snap elections resulted in a wildly fragmented Assembly — as you'll know well if you were following me.
The Left coalition got roughly 190 seats. The Macronist parties got roughly 170. The far-right (RN) got roughly 140. Conservatives got roughly 40.
2. In French, coalition that controls the Assembly gets to be Prime Minister — & effectively govern the country with little input from the president (if the PM + president are in different camps).
But no election in current regime had never resulted in such a fragmented chamber.
Pam Bondi was Florida's attorney general during Trump's first campaign & some of his first first term—and that generated plenty of stories on her legal decisions.
Here's just a slice of what you should know, featuring great reporting from the mid-2010s:
1—As Florida AG, Bondi nixed suing Trump over Trump U after she solicited a contribution from him & he gave $25,000: floridapolitics.com/archives/21237…
2—Bondi's office justified nixing Trump U suit by saying she'd only receiving only one customer complaint, but the AP found this: jacksonville.com/story/news/201…
Abortion is big in the presidential race, of course, & there are many referendums on it.
But there's more: there are many races that are too overlooked where abortion rights is a key issue, for downballot offices that really matter to abortion policy.
My thread of the top 5: ⬇️
1️⃣ I have to start with Arizona's judicial elections.
Two things simultaneously: 1. Two of the 4 justices who voted to revive a near-total abortion ban this spring are up for retention. 2. GOP has advanced a measure to nullify these judicial elections. boltsmag.org/proposition-13…
2️⃣ DeSantis removed Tampa's elected prosecutor from office, citing in part the prosecutor's decision to sign a letter saying he wouldn't prosecute abortion. cases. (DeSantis has signed strict restrictions.)
Harris is up 47% to 44%.
(Not a typo. Last DMR poll had Trump up 47/43 in September.)
In 2016 & 2020, Selzer’s final poll looked like an outlier in opposite direction; days after, we learned it was actually not off, & had foreshadowed polling error in Rust Belt.
This, again, is just one poll; we’ll see soon enough whether it captured something no one else did.
Other details in poll:
—Poll was this Monday through Thursday.
—Margin is within MoE of 3.4%, of course (though this is a looooot more off from expectations).
—Harris up 28% among independent women, though Trump up among men.
—RFK at 3%
Here's what I'd say about why people care about the Selzer poll, besides the mythologizing. In final days of both 2016 & 2020, as polling had Dems in strong shape (well, esp. in 2020), it was the rare sign that something could be amiss in other polling. (1/3)
Extent to which Rust Belt white voters swung to Trump was just not understood before we saw results in 2016, tho Selzer gave a preview. (She also was first to capture IA changed in 2014.) There was this idea in 2020 that had swung back; her poll was clearest cold shower.
But of course: IT'S JUST ONE POLL! It's subject to the same margin of error, can be off in any direction, and in the moment it wasn't clear what they meant.
Same today: IT'S JUST ONE POLL.
But that gets to other thing about Selzer poll: it's clearly uninterested in herding.