Voting in Pennsylvania has started.
The laws governing the election cannot be changed after voting starts.
If the rules could be changed now (which they can't) the governor would have to agree.
Sometimes I feel like I'm putting out a forest fire with a squirt gun.
It's amazing to me that people think it could be easy (or even possible!) for a few party members to get together and throw a US presidential election to a candidate who (assuming) loses the electoral college and popular vote.
(OK, I understand it's been a weird 4 years)
Other than voting, there isn't much that people can do.
The Democratic Party and the Biden campaign are on this.
How? Teams of lawyers in each state. This is being watched carefully and legal teams will respond.
(I know because I'm one of them)
I suspect that this will backfire.
I think the big moment in the debate was Trump's rant had how he wasn't planning on a peaceful transition if he loses⤵️
Remember what happened in Wisconsin when the GOP tried so hard to suppress the vote?
People say, "Oh, yeah?"
It seems to me the best way to get people to vote is to threaten them with losing their right to vote (and telling them that the president is trying to rig a way for their vote not to count.)
So it's important for people to understand what the GOP is trying to do.
But there's a difference between saying, "The election can be rigged" (which discourages voting) and "These GOP jerks want to take away your right to vote. They want to throw the election to Trump even if he loses. So you better get to the polling place and stop them."
The thing to remember is that Donald Trump wants you to think he can rig the election.
He isn't quietly trying to rig the election.
He's making a lot of noise. The GOP is waving flags and shouting: "Look at us, over here, trying to rig the election."
Isn't that weird?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The prosecution has everyone confused because they are framing the case as "election fraud" and "election interference" so everyone is trying to connect the crimes we know about to "election fraud."
This would be clear: "It is election fraud. Here is how the evidence will support a charge of election fraud." Then show how the behavior supports election fraud.
For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.
I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."
Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"
We saw the J6 committee findings.
Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."
2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"
A lot of people do.
People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.
I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .
3/
. . . because it is designed to keep people hooked. People need to stay glued to the screen for hour after hour.
But to hook people, you need to scare them. The Facebook whistleblower testified that content that produces strong emotions like anger gets more engagement.
2/
Fox does the same thing. There is a few minutes of news, but the facts get lost as commentators and TV personalities speculate and scare their audiences.
Before you yell at me for comparing MSNBC to FOX, read all of this:
If I write another blog post addressing the outrage cycle here on Twitter and in the MSNBC ecosystem, it will be to explore why so many people who believe they are liberal or progressive actually want a police state.
1/
Today alone, a handful of people who consider themselves liberal or progressive told me that the "traitors need to be arrested and prosecuted."
In 2019, back when I wore myself out tamping down misinformation, I explained the legal meaning of treason.
2/
Back then, I now realize, people asked politely: "Can Trump be prosecuted for treason (over the Russia election stuff).
I explained that wouldn't happen.
Now it's different. It's more like fascist chants.
3/