We need to stop using ‘mental illness’ as a reason for abusive & criminal behaviours.
People like that are not ‘mentally ill’ - they made an active choice to do something horrific, & cos you can’t understand why they did it or what they gain from it, you call them ‘mentally ill’
I see it all the time on social media
Trump does something horrendous and everyone claims he’s mentally ill
Someone commits a horrific crime and everyone diagnoses them with something
They aren’t ‘mentally ill’, they are just a fuckin horrible person who chooses to abuse.
Someone you don’t like tweets something you don’t agree with and you’re all in the comments claiming they have a personality disorder.
No they don’t, you just don’t like what they said and you’re using psychiatric terms to label and stigmatise
You know why you all do that?
Because you know full well that psychiatry and mental health stigma oppresses and harms people - which enables you to use it as a slur.
If the field was as progressive as we all claim, no one would do this
It’s high time we stopped labelling abusers, rapists, dictators, murderers etc as ‘mentally ill’ for two reasons:
It minimises their choice to harm others and dismisses their agency
It stigmatises people who are struggling with trauma and their own mental health
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People say and post ‘end mental health stigma’ because they don’t realise or understand that stigma is the name of the game - stigma is the point, stigma is the process, stigma is the power, stigma is the labelling, stigma is the centre of mental health and psychiatry.
A Thread
Without stigma, there are no psychiatric labels. They can’t exist.
You can only be diagnosed with a mental disorder if someone in power believes you differ sufficiently from ‘normal people’, and are therefore ‘mentally disordered’ - the entire thing is stigma and stigmatising.
Therefore, if you remove all stigma, you dismantle the system of mental health & the concept of psychiatry too.
Most people don’t understand that.
They think there is a way to diagnose, medicate, section & imprison people - but just ‘end the stigma’, but that is not possible.
One of the attitudes I test a lot in my academic research is the answer to this item:
‘I believe women and girls should report all instances of male violence in order to protect other women and girls from the same perpetrator’
I usually follow this up with the next item:
⬇️
‘I believe that women and girls should be held responsible if they don’t report to the police, and then their perpetrator goes on to attack another woman or girl’
I’ve tested these two items on thousands of people over the last few years, and the results are always concerning.
Anywhere between 20-90% of people will agree with the first item. Anywhere between 20-60% will agree with the second item.
I strongly believe that one of the biggest mistakes we ever made was psychologically and systemically separating ‘us’ from ‘them’ - ‘the clients’ from ‘the professionals’.
Here’s why ⬇️
It’s a false dichotomy. It is an illusion that serves the professional. It makes them feel powerful.
We have all been groomed into believing the ‘them’ and ‘us’ story.
That the professionals are the together, clever, supported, educated, compassionate, stable ones - and the clients are the chaotic, vulnerable, unstable, uneducated ones.
There are 10 common myths about male violence towards women and girls that are holding us back from making any change:
⬇️
1. If a woman is raped, she will fight back or scream for help
Fact: Over 70% of women who are raped will freeze and will stay silent. Fighting back is extremely rare. It is safer for many to stay still, and it is often involuntary.
2. Only vulnerable women are abused
Fact: Domestic and sexual abuse of women is common across all demographics, regardless of age, class, background, education, status or ability. Male violence is so common that it transcends all factors.
The reason there is so much Christian symbolism in horror films about psychiatric wards & insane asylums is because after the witch trials were made illegal, Christian churches set up ‘insane asylums’ where the treatment for ‘hysteria’ & ‘madness’ was conversion to Christianity.
It is important that we understand the enduring and devastating relationship that psychiatry and religion had/has with each other and the way we never really moved from seeing people as evil, mentally ill, insane & mad.
History is vital to our understanding of current oppression
The insane asylums were terrifying places. The vast majority of people sent there were women and minorities. They were tortured, abused, raped, converted, not allowed to speak their mother tongue, gaslit, controlled and in lots of cases, they were murdered.
A reminder that Elsevier made $10.5 BILLION in 2022 from selling your academic journals and articles behind paywalls, and make more profit than Amazon, Google, and Apple every year…
And paid the academics who wrote the articles $0
And paid the reviewers of the articles $0
This is why I don’t participate in the academic publishing industry. The academics are convinced that the only way their ideas will be taken seriously is if they GIVE AWAY their work to billion dollar corporations who will sell their work forever behind paywalls.
The publishing companies control the information and evidence bases, ensuring that only a tiny percentage of people ever have access to knowledge and information. They have such a monopoly, that if you don’t give your work to them, you’re seen as less ‘academic’.