Jobs day charts thread! (Will be adding gradually because I'm writing the main story today, which you can find here: nytimes.com/2020/10/02/bus…)
Even after the recent gains, we still have nearly 11 million fewer jobs than before the pandemic, and progress is slowing. By comparison, we lost 8.7 million jobs in the Great Recession.
The worst news in this report: The number of people reporting they have lost their jobs permanently (as opposed to being on temporary layoff/furlough) rose again. Evidence of mounting long-run damage to the economy. nytimes.com/live/2020/10/0…
Back in April, nearly 80% of unemployed workers said they were only temporarily out of work. Now it's less than 40%.
To be clear, that's partly the result of rising permanent job losses, but it's *mostly* the result of furloughed employees being called back to work. Number of people on temporary layoff has fallen dramatically.
Measures of permanent or "core" (per @JedKolko definition) unemployment are rising, but are still nowhere close to as bad in the Great Recession.
The "misclassification" issue, in which people who should be counted as unemployed are instead counted as employed but absent, is still around, but shrinking. Unemployment rate would have been about four tenths of a point higher without the issue.
The leisure & hospitality sector added 300k jobs in September, but remains 3.8 million in the hole relative to February. And notable that it actually lost jobs on a non-seasonally adjusted basis -- this is usually a month when hotels cut jobs, so a small loss shows up as a gain.
The only major sector to *lose* jobs in September was government, which cut 200k+. That's partly the result of the end of temporary census jobs (-40k). But it mostly reflects big cuts to local school districts.
(Though for consistency's sake, I should note that local education actually added jobs on a not seasonally adjusted basis. It's just a much smaller gain than in most years.)
The "goods" side of the economy has held up much better than services. But construction and manufacturing aren't exactly going gangbusters -- certainly not enough to offset the struggles of the service side of the economy.
The employment rate ticked up in September, but it's barely halfway back to where it was before the pandemic, and it's still way below the worst of the last recession.
And among prime-age workers (25-54), the employment rate actually fell.
The drop in prime-age employment was entirely among women, who are bearing the brunt of school closures. See @jeannasmialek's more detailed discussion of this here: nytimes.com/live/2020/10/0…
Long-term unemployment -- the great scourge of the last recession -- is rising again. Already, 2.4 million Americans have been out of work for more than six months, and that's only the beginning. nytimes.com/live/2020/10/0…
The slowdown shows up clearly in the gross flows data. The number of unemployed people getting jobs fell. The number of employed people losing jobs rose. (Note this is true regardless of whether you focus on official unemployment or include flows into/out of the labor force.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
President Trump didn't like the jobs numbers, so he fired the person responsible for producing them.
It's a move that has been tried before, by leaders of countries from Argentina to Greece to the Soviet Union. It rarely ends well.
(Link at end of thread)
Janet Yellen, not a person prone to hyperbole, put it this way: “This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic."
Key point from Andreas Georgiou, who was criminally prosecuted for insisting on reporting accurate deficit figures when he was head of Greece's statistical agency: Reliable data is essential for democracy.
CBO is out with its final cost estimate of the tax-and-spending bill passed by the House.
- Revenue ⬇️ by $3.7 trillion over 10 years
- Spending ⬇️ by $1.3 trillion
- Debt ⬆️ by $2.4 trillion over 10 years
- Uninsured pop. ⬆️ by 10.9 million in 2034
Full analysis: cbo.gov/publication/61…
The spending cuts mostly come from Medicaid ($344 billion over 10 years), food stamps and related programs ($295 billion) and the Affordable Care Act ($132 billion).
Note that these estimates don't take into account the macroeconomic impacts of the policy changes (it is not "dynamic" in wonk parlance). So to the extent tax/spending cuts affect economic growth, that will also affect revenues. CBO is working on an analysis that estimates these effects.
So this was an interesting finding from @NateSilver538, but one I found odd because @BLS_gov publishes CPI for regions (and for some metro areas) but not for states. So I dug into it a bit, and there's less here than meets the eye.
Nate's data is coming from this tracker from the @JECRepublicans. They don't have a state-level inflation estimate either, though. They just use BLS's estimate of regional inflation and apply it to an estimate of household spending when Biden took office. jec.senate.gov/public/index.c…
You can see this if you hover over their map (or download their data). States in the same region all have the same cumulative rates of inflation. But they differ in the amount of inflation experienced in dollar terms because some states have higher avg household incomes.
I hate that @ellawinthrop is leaving us, but I'm so glad I got to work with her on her last piece for @nytimesbusiness. She's the best, most collaborative, most creative visual journalist I've ever worked with. A thread with a few of my favorite Ben-and-Ella collabs:
Good news on inflation! U.S. consumer prices FELL 0.1 percent in June, and were up just 3 percent from a year earlier. "Core" prices, stripping out volatile food and fuel, were up 0.1 percent from May and 3.3 percent from last June. Data: …Live coverage: bls.gov/news.release/c… nytimes.com/live/2024/07/1…
This is the second straight month where there has been effectively no inflation on a month-to-month basis. Prices were flat in May, and down in June.
If you take a longer view here: At 3% year-over-year, inflation is no longer outside historical norms (though it is still higher than immediately prepandemic). And over the past three months, rents have risen at an annual rate of ***just 1.1%.***
Job openings ticked up in May (but only because April was revised down). Layoffs edged up. Quits basically flat. All consistent with a gradually slowing, but not collapsing, job market. #JOLTS
Full data: bls.gov/news.release/j…
There were 8.1 million job openings on the last day of May. That's up from 7.9 million in April, revised down from the 8.1m originally reported.
Larger story here is that openings are clearly falling quickly, even if they're still high in absolute terms. #JOLTS
There were 1.2 job openings for every unemployed worker in May. That's more or less where things stood immediately before the pandemic (when the labor market was widely viewed as strong but not overheated).