THREAD: what happened with COVID in September and where are we now? It's been an eventful month and there is good news and bad news... read on to find out which is which!
NB: Longish thread (18 tweets) but hopefully informative with lots of pretty charts...
Confirmed cases have continued to rise, but hard to interpret cos of ongoing problems with testing. But let's go with this for now - where are the confirmed cases?
All the nations have seen steep increases over September but Wales and N Ireland doing rising less steeply than England and Scotland... Let's dig a bit further into England
Big regional variation. Cases rising fastest in NW, NE, Yorks & Humber. Then Midlands and London... From confirmed cases look like there are 3 epidemics at least in England. The increase in cases has not surprisingly led to increase in hospitalisations
And hospital admissions are regionally different too - NE+Yorks, NW saw big increases over Sept (and continuing increases). Midlands + London increased but have recently plateaued... Rest of country not seeing big rises.
Unfortunately, increasing hospital admissions lead to increasing numbers of deaths a few weeks later, and we are now seeing this: in both ONS death registry data (gold standard) & daily deaths within 28 days of a +ve test. While hospital admissions stay high, this will continue.
Ok, so moving on from confirmed cases, let's look at interim results from @imperialcollege REACT study that published results from 84K randomly sampled people yesterday - gives a much better picture of detail & extent of spread. imperial.ac.uk/news/205473/la…
1) fourfold increase in cases over September - there is a LOT more virus around now. Concentrated in 17-24 yr olds but fastest growth in 65+ (worrying for future hosp admissions). Under 16s don't seem more infected than rest - schools don't seem to be increasing transmission
Also worrying that the BME population twice as likely to have COVID, esp given known to be more at risk from severe disease (and already ICNARC says new ICU COVID patients disproportionately BME). Increased spread does not impact people evenly
The geographic distribution is interesting. Yes NW, NE & Yorks still highest by a way, but London also very high (and HIGHER than Midlands). So, are the reduced London *confirmed* cases due to London not getting enough tests?
We can see here from comparing 3 LAs in the NW to 4 from London how being on the PHE watchlist does seem to trigger more testing - not a bad thing if there's plenty of capacity. When there isn't (like now), risks new hotspots being missed for a while (e.g. London)
Now for some good news.... Although we had very rapid and substantial spread in Sept, recent week seems to show slowing from KCL symptom app, REACT study and ONS. Doubling time likely to be 3-5 weeks which is a big improvement on 8 days a few weeks ago!
That said, overall R or doubling time probably not that helpful given to how differently epidemic is playing out in the North compared to Midlands & London and then SW & SE.
But slowing is slowing and what could be causing it? People are going out less now and intend to go out less in future. People ARE modifying their behaviour and support restrictions. Good news!
Meanwhile contact tracing (remember that? the way out of restrictions? the thing govt is meant to be fixing?) is not doing so well... New referred cases reached has dropped from 82% to 71% recently, little else improving. Still need support for isolation.
Even more concerning, it is performing WORST where it is needed the MOST (NW). This might partly expain why growth in NW is more rapid than elsewhere.
So where are we for October? Well it's a tale of the good, the bad and the ugly...
GOOD: growth is slowing quite a bit. We've bought ourselves a lot more time.
BAD: Massive increase in COVID in Sept
UGLY: Contact tracing
LAST TWEET: What have we bought ourselves time for? What's the strategy? We need a GOOD test & trace system that works -> REVERSES growth AND will let us ease off the restrictions. It's our way out! Govt MUST urgently fix it. We're doing our bit, they must do theirs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid.
They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17
Our study, led by Prof @katebrown220, looked at all hospitalisations in England in children with a Covid diagnosis or positive test from Aug 2020-Aug 2023.
We then *excluded* all admissions where a Covid diagnosis was incidental (ie not why they were in hospital)
2/17
Infants (babies under 1) are generally at higher risk from respiratory infections, plus they are the age group that, if infected, are overwhelmingly meeting the virus for the first time.
They are not vaccinated and have not had it before. 3/17
Prof @Kevin_Fong giving the most devastating and moving testimony to the Covid Inquiry of visiting hospital intensive care units at the height of the second wave in late Dec 2020.
The unimaginable scale of death, the trauma, the loss of hope.
Please watch this 2min clip.
And here he breaks down while explaining the absolute trauma experienced by smaller hospitals in particular - the "healthier" ICU patients were transferred out, leaving them coping with so much death.
They felt so alone.
Here Prof Fong explains how every nurse he met was traumatised by watching patients die, being only able to hold up ipads to their relatives and how it went against their normal practice of trying to ensure a dignified death, with family there.
🧵War causes direct civilian deaths but also indirect deaths over the following years.
Recent paper estimates eventual total direct & indirect deaths in Gaza attributable to the war - 10% of entire pop'n.
I want to explain these estimates and why deaths must be counted. 1/13
Why count casualties from war anyway? For moral, legal and strategic reasons.
1 - owe it to those who have died
2 - International law says must count & identify dead as far as possible
3 - monitor progress of war & learn from tactics
2/13
There are direct and indirect casualties of war. Direct deaths include those who killed by fighting or bombs.
Indirect deaths are those that die when they would otherwise have lived because of one or more of: lack of food, healthcare, housing, sanitation, income, hope. 3/13
THREAD: the summer Covid wave in the UK continues.
Basically, there is a LOT of Covid around and not a lot of other respiratory viruses.
If you have cold or flu symptoms, it's probably Covid.
The latest hospital data from England shows steady, quite high levels. 1/8
But admissions don't tell us how much virus is circulating more generally. The best (but imperfect) measure we have is wasterwater measurements, and only in Scotland and not England.
Scotland's wastewater is showing a huge July peak - highest since Omicron's 1st yr in 2022 2/8
Because different people shed different amounts of virus and variants can matter too, you can't for sure infer how many people were infected between different wasterwater peaks. BUT given the size, I'd say it's pretty likely this is the largest peak since 2022 in Scotland 3/8