You may have seen recently that Nancy Pelosi was campaigning in Michigan. She wasn't just doing that to support Joe Biden. The Democrats are preparing for a scenario in which the House of Representatives has to choose the President under the Constitution. /1
That could happen if the electoral college votes are tied 269 to 269 or if neither candidate receives 270 votes, which could in theory be the case if one or more states cannot get its electors together by the deadline in order to cast their votes. /2
In that situation, the House of Representatives chooses the President. But, it does NOT do so by each MEMBER of the House voting. It does so by each STATE casting one vote. So, to win, a candidate needs to get 26 or more of the states to vote for him. /3
Presumably to cast its one vote, the delegation from each state confers with it's own members & decides by majority vote which candidate to vote for. (There are no rules for that anywhere to my knowledge.) /4
So, for example, Washington state has 10 Members of Congress. They decide together how to vote Washington's one vote. In Washington, 7 members are Democratic & 3 are Republicans, so the Washington delegation would presumably vote for Joe Biden. /5
Thus, it's important to know what the split is between Republicans & Democrats for each state to see how each state would likely vote in this scenario. In one state, Michigan, there is also an Independent who might make a difference (Justin Amash). /6
And remember that the election on November 3, 2020 can/will change this. The Congress that would select the President is NOT the one sitting now, but the one that will be sworn in in January 2021. /7
But to see where the issues are, we can look at the current makeup of the current Congress. Right now, 25 states have at least 60% members who are Republican, 20 states have at least 60% members who are Democratic, and 5 states where neither party has 60% or more. /8
These are the 25 Republican states: /9
These are the 20 Democratic states: /10
These are only 5 states where the split is very close. Neither party has 60% or more in this 5 states. Florida leans Republican, Pennsylvania is even, Arizona & California lean Democratic, Michigan is even if Amash goes right or leans left if Amash leans left. /11
If today's Congress was voting, Florida is majority Republican (by one member), so Trump would have 26 states & win the Presidency. Joe Biden would have to get all 5 of these close states to vote for him & 1 of the Republican states. In the current Congress, Joe wouldn't win./12
Notice that Michigan is 50/50 if Justin Amash votes with Republicans, but is majority Democrat if he votes with them. So, the Michigan delegation would have to figure out what to do to cast it's vote if they are tied at 50/50. /13
Pennslyvania is also 50/50, so it would have the same problem as Michigan, while Arizona and Colorado are like Florida, they slightly lean toward one party (Democratic) - by one vote, so presumably would vote for Biden, but it's close. /14
So that's the current situation if today's Congress was voting on the issue, but the next Congress is who will vote, so unless there's a big change in states that have 60% majorities, these 5 states are critical for deciding the Presidency if the House must vote on it in Jan. /15
And the percentage split makes it look a little misleading, because while it's 52 to 48 Republican in Florida & 57 to 43 Democratic in Colorado, for example, in actuality that difference is only ONE seat. In theory, five seats in the House could decide the Presidency. /16
It also makes the seat Amash is vacating extremely important. If the Republican wins that seat, Michigan is 50/50, if a Democrat wins that seat, Michigan is 57% Democratic. /17
This is why they are pushing in Michigan & Pennsylvania -the 2 states effectively 50/50 now & Florida (R by 1 seat). If they can win by 1 seat in those states & hold their 1 seat leads in Arizona & Colorado the Dems have 25 states. Joe would need 1 more to win in a House vote./18
In the event that the states were to split 25 to 25 in the voting, they would have to keep voting until they break the tie. A quorum of 2/3 of the states are needed; each state is represented if at least one of its delegation is present; a majority of the states voting wins. /19
One can only imagine the horror that a tie 25 to 25 vote would be. There'd be lobbying (and who knows what else) against the delegations that have the slimmest majorities. Maybe delegations would have different rules for deciding their state's 1 vote. It could get very ugly. /20
Of course, if one of the candidates get a majority in the Electoral College (270 votes), we won't have to worry about any of this. /21
Makes it important to vote, folks. Every election, every race. /22
Another thing you could take away from this is that if you have some money to donate for races or a race, it might be wise to give it candidates in those 5 states who need help to hold their red seat or flip it red. /23
I’m happy the Right of Center now sees how awful the criminal justice system is.
But don’t expect me to be particularly outraged at how these prosecutors & judges have acted because IT’S NOT NEW & IT’S NOT NEWS TO ME.
It’s been this way the whole time & you didn’t care before.
So welcome to the fight, but don’t act like you are dropping breaking news on me, because you are actually late to the party, and I have been at this party since 1996.
Some of the weaponization & smug assholery you’re now objecting to is not a NEW development aimed at J6ers or Trump supporters - it’s how the people who run the system- prosecutors, judges, BOP, & Probation officers -just are. They’ve just turned it on people you like this time.
Judicial Appointments. DJT's new administration needs to put pedal to the metal on judicial appointments.
Right now the breakdown of all federal judges is:
496 appointed by Dem POTUSs;
382 by Repub POTUSs.
Biden appointed fewer than DJT, 214 to 237 as of today.
But, Biden still has two months to put thru appointments, and has about 40 pending. That would then eclipse DJT's number.
It appears to me that more of the older judges (pre-2010) are Republican appointed based on which POTUS appointed them. 145 of them were appointed by the two Bushs & Reagan. Only 33 were appointed by Bill.
House update. As we know the Republican took control yesterday with 2 non-California seats. Since then 2 more seats have resolved; 1 for Ds, 1 for Rs. These were tossup seats.
There are now 6 races left. Alaska's at-large seat and 5 CA races. Right now it stands: R219 to R210.
Of the 6 remaining races, Rs will almost certainly win the AK race.
3 of the CA races that are D leaners - 1 is still w/in 1%, 1 is 2.4%D, and 1 is 2.5%R.
So, Rs will likely take 1, maybe 2 of these races.
The last 2 CA races are tossup ones - they are both tight races; less than 1% difference, with about 15% left to count. They have see-sawed back and forth, & could go either way here at the end. We'll see.
Best case scenario: Rs take 4 of the remaining 6.
Worst case scenario: Rs take only 2 of the 6.
These liberal loons are lucky that Trump ISN’T the kind of person who would illegally & unconstitutionally use the powers of his office to target his enemies & critics, because some of them actually fucking deserve it.
They won’t like having accountability imposed on them within constitutional limits either, but that’s too fucking bad.
Fortunately for them, our love (& DJT’s) for the Constitution will protect them from what some of them did to him.
It’s a disgusting smear of him & us that these Leftists claim the Right of Center will act like the fascists they fantasize us to be & that they actually are.
18. Montana (Daines)(R) 19. New Hampshire (Shaheen)(D) 20. New Jersey (Booker)(D) 21. New Mexico (Lujan)(D) 22. North Carolina (Tillis)(R) 23. Oklahoma (Mullin)(R) 24. Oregon (Merkley)(D) 25. Rhode Island (Reed)(D) 26. South Carolina (Graham)(R)